| Revision as of 09:47, 5 October 2009 editApcbg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,898 editsm →Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje: + link← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:11, 7 October 2009 edit undoRussavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje: mergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| <hr style="width:50%;" /> | <hr style="width:50%;" /> | ||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje|]|}} | :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje|]|}} | ||
| *'''Merge''' then '''redirect''' to ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 7 October 2009
Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje
- Bulgarian Cultural Club – Skopje (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable political club, no independent media coverage. Of the seven sources currently cited in the article, only one is independent of the club itself, and that's just a local news report on some other friendly association's website which mentions participation of this club in a small local event in passing. Article was also misused for political WP:COATRACK advocacy (now removed). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 10:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep — The suggested proposal rationale does not quite correspond to the present version of the article. Apcbg (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: I uphold the nomination. None of the recent additions constitute multiple, non-trivial media coverage. The organisation published some press releases about two events that are presumably major topics of public discussion in the Macedonian media at the moment (the ideological controversy over a newly published encyclopedia, and the havary of a boat on Lake Ohrid), but none of which is inherently related to the organisation itself. It got a few local media to quote those press releases as part of their coverage of those events. That's not "multiple non-trivial" coverage of the organisation as such, in my view. Still fails WP:ORG ("Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient"). Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: First, the monument proposal (not a press release at all) submitted by the Club to the Mayor of Ohrid is surely “inherently related to the organisation itself”, and indeed reported by secondary sources as an initiative of the organization's.
- Comment: I uphold the nomination. None of the recent additions constitute multiple, non-trivial media coverage. The organisation published some press releases about two events that are presumably major topics of public discussion in the Macedonian media at the moment (the ideological controversy over a newly published encyclopedia, and the havary of a boat on Lake Ohrid), but none of which is inherently related to the organisation itself. It got a few local media to quote those press releases as part of their coverage of those events. That's not "multiple non-trivial" coverage of the organisation as such, in my view. Still fails WP:ORG ("Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient"). Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Second, the Club’s lobbying effort over the Spaska Mitrova case (a facsimile of the answer the organization got from the European Commission is given in their website) is no press release too.
- Third, neither is a press release the Club's activity (reported by secondary sources) over the issue of Bulgarian military graves in the Republic of Macedonia.
- And finally, the cited entry in the official site of the Bulgarian State Agency for Bulgarians Abroad (a secondary source) is about the organization itself not about events. Apcbg (talk) 18:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Merge then redirect to Bulgarians in the Republic of Macedonia. --Russavia 13:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)