Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Zero History: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:41, 11 October 2009 edit69.159.84.182 (talk) Zero History← Previous edit Revision as of 08:09, 11 October 2009 edit undoOdie5533 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,338 edits Internet Detective, reporting for duty, sirNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Redirect''' to ], where if it's not mentioned, it should be. I agree with Liefting that it's a likely search term. ] (]) 13:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Redirect''' to ], where if it's not mentioned, it should be. I agree with Liefting that it's a likely search term. ] (]) 13:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Hey, Internet Detectives, you do realize this is <I>William Fucking Gibson</I> we're talking about, right? I mean, what the shit is the point of deleting this? Any idiot with his head screwed on knows that it's going to get reviews, critical attention, etc - sufficient to have an article by Official Wiki Standards™ - once it's published, so what is the point of deleting its article now? Seriously, explain it to me, not in terms of ] nerdspeak, but in terms of criteria that might actually matter to an actual human being not afflicted with Aspergers. I look forward to it. ] (]) 07:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC) *'''Comment''' Hey, Internet Detectives, you do realize this is <I>William Fucking Gibson</I> we're talking about, right? I mean, what the shit is the point of deleting this? Any idiot with his head screwed on knows that it's going to get reviews, critical attention, etc - sufficient to have an article by Official Wiki Standards™ - once it's published, so what is the point of deleting its article now? Seriously, explain it to me, not in terms of ] nerdspeak, but in terms of criteria that might actually matter to an actual human being not afflicted with Aspergers. I look forward to it. ] (]) 07:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Per ] of the Internet Detective Official Wiki Standards™. Also, no reliable sources mentioning its existence, ]. --] (]) 08:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:09, 11 October 2009

Zero History

Zero History (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Upcoming book with apparently zero history of notability assertion. Of the four references, one is the author's blog, and the other three are about the author, not about the book. Delete without prejudice against recreation once the book becomes a hit.  Blanchardb -- timed 03:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Categories: