| Revision as of 12:39, 9 July 2009 editObiWan353 (talk | contribs)431 edits Undid revision 301154540 by Carl.bunderson (talk)I prefer blanking, thank you.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:43, 12 October 2009 edit undoRacepacket (talk | contribs)16,693 edits seeking communication about your changesNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| For some reason, your User talk page has been blanked, and I assure you that I found it this way. | |||
| ==Miami Hurricanes football== | |||
| I don't understand the edits that you made this afternoon and would like to discuss them with you. It appears that you reverted six separate edits, involving even a larger number of changes without describing why you made those changes. As a result, many "peacock words" and POV were reinserted into the article. I am surprised that you would consider that an improvement, and I am interested in learning your views on the subject. The only thing that you have shared with me about this was one of my other edits about the Orange Bowl was "too plain." I am making these changes in good faith and assume that you are reverting them all in good faith as welll, but you are not communicating your reasoning for making these changes. Perhaps you could respond on the article talk page. Thanks. ] (]) 20:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:43, 12 October 2009
For some reason, your User talk page has been blanked, and I assure you that I found it this way.
Miami Hurricanes football
I don't understand the edits that you made this afternoon and would like to discuss them with you. It appears that you reverted six separate edits, involving even a larger number of changes without describing why you made those changes. As a result, many "peacock words" and POV were reinserted into the article. I am surprised that you would consider that an improvement, and I am interested in learning your views on the subject. The only thing that you have shared with me about this was one of my other edits about the Orange Bowl was "too plain." I am making these changes in good faith and assume that you are reverting them all in good faith as welll, but you are not communicating your reasoning for making these changes. Perhaps you could respond on the article talk page. Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)