Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Lepanto opening: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:32, 13 October 2009 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Lepanto opening. using TW  Revision as of 13:07, 13 October 2009 edit undoThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators98,905 editsm deletion sortingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|?}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|G}}


:{{la|Lepanto opening}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Lepanto opening}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
:({{findsources|Lepanto opening}}) :({{findsources|Lepanto opening}})
fails ]. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the ''inventor of the opening'' and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). ] (]) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC) fails ]. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the ''inventor of the opening'' and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). ] (]) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:07, 13 October 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small>

Revision as of 13:07, 13 October 2009

Lepanto opening

Lepanto opening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. While there is (brief) coverage of the opening it is not enough, particularly since those sources available fail the test of being third-party, reliable and independent. Of the sources I can find one was written in an unreliable 'zine by the inventor of the opening and the rest are similarly unreliable (player zines that aren't just written by amateurs but, as player magazines, don't really work as evidence of notability). Ironholds (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Categories: