Revision as of 03:19, 16 October 2009 editDwayne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,149 edits →False← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:22, 16 October 2009 edit undoDwayne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,149 edits →FalseNext edit → | ||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
I never got rollback before i was online all day yesterday no one granted me anything, and why was it revoked?--] <sup>]</sup> 03:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | I never got rollback before i was online all day yesterday no one granted me anything, and why was it revoked?--] <sup>]</sup> 03:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Also, i never requested rollback yesterday anyways. What re you talking about, Your making my reputation look bad because of what you put as a note. If i dont get a response from you in 15 mins i will remove the lie automatically. --] <sup>]</sup> 03:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:22, 16 October 2009
Bannerman High School
I just wanted to let you know that I just undeleted Bannerman High School which you deleted as an attack page. The article was just in a vandalized state, so I reverted to an earlier good version. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
polaraudio.ogg
If you could Fastily, please delete File:polaraudio.ogg
It is an audio version of an article that no longer exists, and it is VERY out of date.
thank you, User99671 (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly! Done -FASTILY 17:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again!,
User99671 (talk) 21:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Ronan Keating
Oh? Not constructive? You didn't read what you reverted to, did you? Why didn't you improve upon my friendly suggestion instead? You don't like the English language, it seems. --87.78.37.55 (talk) 21:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, just realised you're on Huggle: Of course you don't like language and actual editing. Good thing that's not a prerequisite to be an admin. --87.78.37.55 (talk) 21:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
OR? O... RLY? Ok, I'll play along. Should I cite an English grammar schoolbook? --87.78.37.55 (talk) 21:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Vandalism?? My edit happened with the sole intention of drawing the attention of someone knowledgeable on Keating; it happened with the good-faithed intention of improving the article. So, it's of course nothing like OR. And it is nothing like vandalism, which, last time I checked, consists of deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. I am far removed from any such intentions, as would be clear to anyone capable of admitting to their own misjudgement. --87.78.37.55 (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I just want to point out that citing WP:OR in this case is a tad ridiculous ;-) Xavexgoem (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/81.84.85.120
I checked this IP users contribs and found that he randomly changed dates on about 58 articles. I went ahead and did a full rollback on the latest contributions. Keep an eye on him for me thanks. --] (] :: ]) 22:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sure thing. Cheers, FASTILY 04:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
vandalism?
Hello, you left a message on my talk page stating that I committed vandalism on a wikipedia article. Could you please tell me which article, and which edit of mine was objectionable?
Thanks! I am signing with four tildes: bostonbrahmin 23:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonbrahmin20 (talk • contribs)
Thank you
Thank you so much, Fastily. I am very grateful that I can be trusted. - I intend on using Rollback only for Vandalism. Once again, Thank you very much. Rttam (talk) 00:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Removing Stale WP:AIV report.
Hi Fastily. With this edit, you said you were removing a “stale report.” But, you also removed a report on an IP vandal that I had only filed one minute prior to your removing it, and the IP editor is continuing to vandalize. Thanks! — SpikeToronto 06:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Fastily. You have new messages at SpikeToronto's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
warning to Mehrrunnissa
Hi, Thanks for such a prompt action! Would it be possible to revert it back before Mehrrunissa started the vandalism and when the administrators semi-locked it? The user has written that 10 million people (10% of Indian population) has been cannibalized!! Apart from the absence of any citation, the sheer absurdity of this statement should speak for itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Salwa_Judum&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/Naxalite http://en.wikipedia.org/Communist_Party_of_India_(Maoist)
Thanks again, Vinter-light (talk) 06:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
restoring pages
I sincerely appreciate your prompt action.
Vinter-light (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Missed link of Mehrrunnissa's vandalism
I am really sorry to bother you again, but seems like I should have separated the links with space, as you have missed this one -
http://en.wikipedia.org/Salwa_Judum
I also suspect that Keysvolume is same as Mehrrunnissa, as they did same kind of edits on two of the pages, almost at the same time - but I have asked for a checkuser and would wait for that.
Regards, Vinter-light (talk) 07:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
St. Clair County, Michigan
I think you killed a map, here ;). Be careful when CSDing files on commons. -- Luk 08:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, you're not the first and that image has been annoying me for months (showing up on my bot as "image that should be orphaned manually")... At least I have uploaded it back to commons with it's "normal" name, I'll let the commons admins sort it all out :) -- Luk 07:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion decline
Can you expand on your speedy deletion decline of Category:Museums established in 1840? How is it exempt from WP:CSD#C1? 70.150.94.194 (talk) 15:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Ashyj555 (talk · contribs)
This user has posted an unblock request, but didn't get it right; I have just fixed it for him, and would (rather doubtfully) suggest giving him another chance. Shortly before you blocked him, he posted on his user page what I might call a pre-emptive my-little-brother-did-it defence and said he was keen to contribute, and I told him "If nobody vandalises from your account again, you'll be all right, but the first time it happens again you will be blocked, and blaming someone else won't help." His few edits thereafter were not helpful but were probably in good faith. The reason I'm unenthusiastic about letting him loose is because I doubt whether he is really capable of making useful contributions - I think he's probably very young - and I really don't want to nursemaid him. I'll let you (or whoever looks at the unblock request) decide. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- I won't argue. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Fastily. You have new messages at Irbisgreif's talk page.Message added 06:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I apologize. Irbisgreif (talk) 06:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Fastily. You have new messages at Talk:Insurrectionary anarchism.Message added 07:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
respected sirs /madam
i had written my original aricles under tha name of maria riizvi
the thoughts were entirely mine i had even deleted the links and would like to know why it was not accepted thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria rizvi (talk • contribs) 08:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Keysvolume is reverting admin made changes on semi protected pages
user -Keysvolume is making reverts of admin made changes, one of them done by you, on - http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Naxalite&action=history - here he made changes after you reverted vandalism done by one user Mehrrunnissa, who is currently blocked and is being investigated for using sockpuppets.
This user is also vandalizing my talk page, indicating that I am a sockpuppet, which he knows is untrue, as I have been cleared off being a sockpuppet. I asked him to stop, and warned that I would report him for vandalism, he did not stop. He also has gone ahead to make reverts of another admin made changes on page - http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Salwa_Judum&action=history - here he reverted to his own version after Someguy121 did the same as above.
Please note, both these pages are under semi-protection and were vandalised by Mehrrunnissa, who being blocked cannot undo the changes. Keysvolume is now doing it instead. He is defying community rules of addressing the issue in the talk page instead of reverting a semi protected page. I also found out that these two users are under investigation for being sockpuppets.
Thanks, Oftenhurry (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I looked through Keysvolume's contribs and reverted any vandalism that wasn't already undone. I also left s/he a
False
I never got rollback before i was online all day yesterday no one granted me anything, and why was it revoked?--Dwayneflanders 03:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Also, i never requested rollback yesterday anyways. What re you talking about, Your making my reputation look bad because of what you put as a note. If i dont get a response from you in 15 mins i will remove the lie automatically. --Dwayneflanders 03:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)