Revision as of 01:29, 24 October 2009 editGwen Gale (talk | contribs)47,788 edits →blocked: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:57, 24 October 2009 edit undoDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
The user, who is a newbie, hasn't forged anything, they only copied the warning to their own page. ] (]) 01:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | The user, who is a newbie, hasn't forged anything, they only copied the warning to their own page. ] (]) 01:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{unblock|I stand firm in my belief that I was neither personally attacking the user in question, or harassing them. I did not revert the removal of messages like the user had said, but removed a post that was placed by an admin on a different user talk page placed on this user talk page as if they had posted it here. I warned the user about doing this, but I don't believe they even read my messages, and just reverted without reading them, as, when another user posted the same thing, the user complied. That said, I will take the user's talk page off of my watch list and I will not bother them further.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 01:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:57, 24 October 2009
6:39 am, 28 December 2024 (PDT)Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
Archives | ||||||||
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Status Quo
Hi Dad - I would ask you to stop making accusations without the necessary evidence to back them up. I have read the policy on proposing articles for deletion and I subsequerntly followed the correct procedure.
An apology would be gratefully accepted. Dingdong12 (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Dad - type in delete wikiepdia article into Google. I think you will see that it isn't very hard to find instructions on how to do so. It's not as though there is a special wikipedia word for deleting an article which you have to be an expert to know and then enter into google is it now? Dingdong12 (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Still waiting for an apology ....Dingdong12 (talk) 20:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- With AfD's like you're filing, you'll wait quite a while. Dayewalker (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
My my my Dad, you do like making accusations don't you and particularly accusations without any evidence. Now you accuse me of lying. I think you will find that you have interpreted the reasons I gave for page deletion as 'clean-up issues.' Did I use those words - I think the page history shows I didn't.
Despite all of this I would still humbly accept your apology. Dingdong12 (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, Daedalus, just letting you know I opened an ANI thread about this ding-dong. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 21:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
As a note to everyone here, I have absolutely no idea why this user is calling me dad. Maybe it's a shortening of my username, maybe it's some kind of insult, I don't know, but what I do know is that this user was recently indef blocked for trolling.— Dædαlus 20:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Your messages to me
Stop leaving messages on my talk page. You're starting to become annoying. The message you claim was on my talk page was in fact in a sandbox area of my user page. I was using it as a test area, something any WP editor can do. You could have only seen it if you were monitoring my activities which frankly is pretty weird. If you have something to say to me then leave it on the talk page of an article I have edited and keep the discussion focused on editing. Your are not administrator. Stop acting like one. Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page, as that is what they are for. Article talk pages are only to be used for discussing improvements to the article. Not for user-to-user communication.— Dædαlus 01:55, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- This is my last message to you. If you continue continue to annoy me I'm going to report you to WP authorities. I'm sure there are policies to prevent this. Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Secondly, as I said there, there are no policies that exist that say that a user can't inform another user of relevant policies, when they have willingly violated them.— Dædαlus 02:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- This is my last message to you. If you continue continue to annoy me I'm going to report you to WP authorities. I'm sure there are policies to prevent this. Moby-Dick3000 (talk) 02:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
One "Powermat," coming up.
Hi, Daed. Not much here, but feel free to do whatever you wish with it. Have fun! Regards, PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Powermat is a wireless charger pad that uses magnetic induction and will be release in the 3Q of 2009 it will cost 100$ for the powermat + 30$ for the differend resivers.
here is a video in youtube that talks about the powermat.
- Jeeze, I was expecting there to be more... This is going to take awhile.— Dædαlus 23:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Article nair
The article Nair is a regular target of vandalism, and have been vandalized around 6 times in the last 48 hours. I am once again requesting to make the article semi-protected. Your refusal to make this article semi-protected is actually encouraging the attacks on this already one of the most vandalized pages. Axxn (talk) 17:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page, but I'll just say it again here. Saying that I refused anything is falsely labeling the facts. You never came to be with anything, and secondly I am not an admin.— Dædαlus 18:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
This is your reminder call
User talk:Redvers#WP:ANI. BTW, I unprotected ANI a few hours ago, seemingly without incident. Yet :o/ ➜ Redvers 21:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- BTW, again, am I missing some reason why you don't have a mop? You clearly know how to use one and could obviously make use of one. Shout me if you'd like proposing/tell me to piss off if not. ➜ Redvers 21:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Skepticfall
is Strider11. Lots of socks YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 00:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration notification: Niteshift36 incivility and article ownership
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Niteshift36 incivility and article ownership and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks,Stargnoc (talk) 05:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
WikiProjects
Hi. Regarding your concern about the new WikiProjects, I solely created these recently in order to improve better organisation of Pakistan-related articles in adherence to their relevant topics. It is my humble request that they be stored. My intent was to gather more users, and later make parameters for them in Template:WP Pakistan. If you can recreate those deleted projects ASAP that would be great. Regards, Yousaf.john (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I have just seen an alleged sockpuppeting investigation launched on me. Completely baseless accusations without any merit. I have no relation whatsoever to that of the accused though I confess to personally knowing User:Ali Rana - we know each other and I did not mind the fact that he edited my userpage. I know I created those WikiProjects despite the fact that they have been deleted before as what you have said are the creation of a "banned user." When I created them, I saw that too however if you look at the archived discussion it clearly say that these projects can be created later if real interest in them is demonstarted. Just because I created them again doesn't mean you wrongfully accuse me! This is totally unjustified. I request immediate settlement of this issue as I see that you are also involved. Yousaf.john (talk) 03:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I am not anti-Indian, pro-Pashtun, anti-Persian, pro-Tajik or whatever. This is bleak conspiracy. Yousaf.john (talk) 03:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Gobbledigook on my talk
Round two I have responded to Radiopathy there. Thanks for chiming in as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Also You'll note (and probably already saw) that the last thing he did before disappearing for several days was try to restore Twinkle. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Stay away
I will not tell you again to stop your Wikihounding. The next time you pop up somewhere out of the context of a Misplaced Pages matter, you will go to AN/I. This is a personal issue which you need to deal with yourself; you apparently feel attacked, when in fact no one is attacking you. Radiopathy •talk• 19:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Also, it is not a personal matter, it is violation of our policy on personal attacks to call another editor a troll.— Dædαlus 20:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
blocked
Given this warning, which you've been removing from another user's talk page, I've blocked you 24 hours for harassment (way over-the-top WP:BITE). Gwen Gale (talk) 01:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The user, who is a newbie, hasn't forged anything, they only copied the warning to their own page. Gwen Gale (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|I stand firm in my belief that I was neither personally attacking the user in question, or harassing them. I did not revert the removal of messages like the user had said, but removed a post that was placed by an admin on a different user talk page placed on this user talk page as if they had posted it here. I warned the user about doing this, but I don't believe they even read my messages, and just reverted without reading them, as, when another user posted the same thing, the user complied. That said, I will take the user's talk page off of my watch list and I will not bother them further.— Dædαlus 01:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)