Misplaced Pages

Stephen Barrett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:10, 24 October 2009 edit24.94.70.168 (talk) REMOVED CRAPTag: adding email address← Previous edit Revision as of 10:27, 24 October 2009 edit undoVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 24.94.70.168 identified as vandalism to last revision by PeterSymonds. (TW)Next edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
| death_date = | death_date =
| death_place = | death_place =
| occupation = Crackpot, Quack and Con in service of insurance and chemical industry, Allegedly an Author in reality a Con pretending to be "Consumer Advocate", a Webmaster | occupation = Psychiatrist, Author, Consumer Advocate, Webmaster
| website = | website =
}} }}


'''Stephen J. Barrett''' (born 1933) Crackpot, a well known American con and clown, is claiming to be retired ] in reality unlicensed or de-licensed ], ], co-founder of the ] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of ] '''Stephen J. Barrett''' (born 1933) is a retired ] ], ], co-founder of the ] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of ]. He runs a number of websites dealing with ] and health ]. He focuses on ], ], and ]. Numerous sources have cited Quackwatch as a useful source for online consumer information.<ref name=nettie/><!-- A long list is already referenced in the body of the article. This is the LEAD where things are abbreviated. -->


⚫ == Biography ==
*"When it QUACKS like a DUCK, and walks like a DUCK, it is Stephen Barrett well known ]! "
*
===This article requires plenty of time to expose the con and quack Stefan Barrett and Ronald Gotts (also known as Ronald Gott) ===
'''The Quackbuster Conspiracy'''
James Carter's, MD's authoritative book "Racketeering In Medicine," published by Hampton Roads, carefully explains the "Quackbuster Conspiracy."
The "Quackbuster Conspiracy" was started shortly after the American Medical Association (AMA), the rquivalent of Doctors Labor Union, a non scientific professional organization with the sole purpose of promoting medical professions and careers and lobbying their priorities in ], lost the court battle to the ]s in a case begun in Federal court in 1976. The Federal judge ordered the AMA's covert operation shut down - and leave the Chiropractors alone. The AMA files, library, etc., ended up in Stephen Barrett's 1,800 square foot basement in Allentown, PA. Barrett, and his minions, had the common sense to stay away from criticizing Chiropractors for quite some time, but never for ever.


⚫ Barrett is a 1957 graduate of the ] and completed his psychiatry ] in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at ] (Chicago).<ref name="QWBIO">
Barrett, a pseudo-psychiatrists self-proclaimed "Consumer Advocate", is a well known mentor of all medical disinformation cases and many scams of specially chemical industry.
For years, Barrett has touted himself as a medical expert on ‘quackery’ in health care sector and has assisted in dozens of court cases as an alleged self proclaimed expert. He also was called upon by the FDA, FTC and other governmental agencies for his purported expertise.
He was the subject of many magazine interviews, including ] and featured on television interviews on ]’s ], ]’s ]].

He has gained media fame by his outspoken vocal disgust and impatience over natural or ] as a valid health care alternative, including his criticisms of two time ] winner ].
Barrett has also filed numerous lawsuits against attorney Negrete who in court exposed him, as well as many practitioners including Dr. ] the uthor of ], in San Diego, California federal court.
Stephan Barrett is also an ex associate of another previously exposed in court an insurance industry fraud master abusing a title of Doctor ]. Gotts became famous for , selling fraudulent medial reports he never read with his mass produced signature and stamp of his signature. Those reports as exposed on ] ], were written by journalists, students, and house wives using specially developed computer "templates" by insurance industry with the purpose to defraud claimants.<br>
'''Stephen Barrett a con claiming to be psychiatrist'''
Court Case: Stephen Barrett, M.D. vs. Tedd Koren, D.C. and Koren Publications, Inc.
Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County for the State of Pennsylvania
Court Case No.: 2002-C-1837
Contact: Carlos F. Negrete
LAW OFFICES OF CARLOS F. NEGRETE
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Phone: 949.493.8115
Fax: 949.493.8170
email: mediarelations@healthfreedomlaw.com
mediarelations@negretelaw.com
http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com
http://www.negretelaw.com

Dr. Tedd Koren, DC.
Phone: 800.537.3001
267.498.0071 Fax: 267.498.0078
http://www.korenpublications.com

The trial started on Monday, October 10, 2005 and ended on October 13, 2005 Barrett was represented by local Allentown attorney, Richard Orloski. In a stunning development, ] ] Judge J. Brian Johnson on Thursday, October 13, 2005, tossed out nationally known self-proclaimed '''consumer medical advocate''' Stephen Barrett’s defamation lawsuit just minutes before it was going to be considered by a local jury.

At that trial, under a heated cross-examination by Negrete, '''Barrett was forced and conced that he was not a Medical Board Certified psychiatrist because he had failed the certification exam.'''
During the course of his examination, Barrett also had to concede his ties to the AMA, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food & Drug Administration (FDA).

Founded by a nonprofit donations from political chemical lobbyist with the help of INSURANCE INDUSTRY, that con became "expert Witness" in many court cases, where he sold fraudulent medical opinions for fees.
Barrett was exposed in many cases in court as a mental case of disbarred allegedly psychiatrist, and greedy con who knowingly and consciously selling for profit fraudulent medical opinions injured many people in his carrier.

*

He runs a number of websites dealing with alleged medical ] and health ]. Impersonating Consumer Advocate as the foundation for his tax exempt status he allegedly focuses on ], ], and ].

Allegedly numerous sources have cited Quackwatch as a useful source for online consumer information.<ref name=nettie/><!-- A long list is already referenced in the body of the article. This is the LEAD where things are abbreviated. -->

⚫ == Biography of the con master==

⚫ Barrett was in 1957 attendant who claim to graduate of the ] and allegedly completed his psychiatry ] in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at ] (Chicago).<ref name="QWBIO">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Stephen |first=Stephen
Line 201: Line 153:
<blockquote>"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."<ref name="Spiked_Online"/></blockquote> <blockquote>"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."<ref name="Spiked_Online"/></blockquote>


== Consumer dis-information == == Consumer information ==
{{main|Quackwatch}} {{main|Quackwatch}}
The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform of disinformation describing and exposing what he and other insurance industry contributors would like to consider to be quackery and as alleged health fraud.<ref name="quacks"> The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be quackery and health fraud.<ref name="quacks">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Fred D |first=Fred D
Line 210: Line 162:
|title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ... |title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ...
|accessdate=2007-09-16 |accessdate=2007-09-16
|publisher=MedHunters}}</ref> The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a ] that raudulently claims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct."<ref name="mission_statement"> |publisher=MedHunters}}</ref> The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a ] that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct."<ref name="mission_statement">
{{cite news {{cite news
|first=Stephen, MD |first=Stephen, MD
Line 240: Line 192:
|accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref> |accessdate=2007-08-16}}</ref>


Barrett has become a "lightning rod" based on medical fraud for alleged controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope."<ref name="jaroff"/><ref name="Ladd"> by Donna Ladd, ], June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects."<ref name="Barrett">{{cite news Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope."<ref name="jaroff"/><ref name="Ladd"> by Donna Ladd, ], June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give ] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects."<ref name="Barrett">{{cite news
|url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/faq2.html |url=http://www.quackwatch.org/00AboutQuackwatch/faq2.html
|author=Barrett SJ |author=Barrett SJ
Line 247: Line 199:
|publisher=]}}</ref> Barrett is at the forefront of exposing shady aspects of chiropractic.<ref>{{cite book |pages=171–72 |chapter= The truth about chiropractic therapy |title= Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine |author= Singh S, Ernst E |year=2008 |publisher= W.W. Norton |isbn=978-0-393-06661-6}}</ref> |publisher=]}}</ref> Barrett is at the forefront of exposing shady aspects of chiropractic.<ref>{{cite book |pages=171–72 |chapter= The truth about chiropractic therapy |title= Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine |author= Singh S, Ernst E |year=2008 |publisher= W.W. Norton |isbn=978-0-393-06661-6}}</ref>


Barrett fraudulently as always, claim to be strong supporter of the ] and he allegedly has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it. In a whole "Special to the '']''", extensive coverage of his views on the subject were provided, including his scams, fraudulent opinions and criticisms of many named abusers.<ref name=Wanjek> Christopher Wanjek. Special to '']'', April 20, 2004; Page HE01</ref> Barrett is a strong supporter of the ] and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it. In a whole "Special to the '']''", extensive coverage of his views on the subject were provided, including his criticisms of many named abusers.<ref name=Wanjek> Christopher Wanjek. Special to '']'', April 20, 2004; Page HE01</ref>


A large number of practitioners and specially supporters of ] charge Barrett and Quackwatch with plain fraud for it's support of chemical industry as the main source of funding his fraudulent claims of "Advocacy to Consumers" with the sole purpose to destroy the confidence in a right choice of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd"/><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">Hufford DJ. David J Hufford, "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 198-212. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Lawrence J. Schneiderman, "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 191-198.</ref> ], a journalist with '']'', says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable. She further writes that Barrett insists that most alternative therapies simply should be disregarded without further research. "A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense," he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture.<ref name="Ladd"/> A number of practitioners and supporters of ] question Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd"/><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">Hufford DJ. David J Hufford, "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 198-212. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Lawrence J. Schneiderman, "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 191-198.</ref> ], a journalist with '']'', says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable. She further writes that Barrett insists that most alternative therapies simply should be disregarded without further research. "A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense," he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture.<ref name="Ladd"/>


Some insurance industry sources that mention Stephen Barrett's ''Quackwatch'' as a useful source for consumer information include website reviews,<ref name="The Good Web Guide">{{cite news Some sources that mention Stephen Barrett's ''Quackwatch'' as a useful source for consumer information include website reviews,<ref name="The Good Web Guide">{{cite news
|first= |first=
|last= |last=
Line 345: Line 297:
== Selected publications == == Selected publications ==


A partial list of disinformation articles Barrett was one of the authors or his authored work was cited include: A partial list of articles Barrett was one of the authors or his authored work was cited include:


* In 1985, Barrett was the author of the ''Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?'' article in the ] that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He concluded that ''"commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."''<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). '']'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">, Seidel S, et al. , '']''. 2001;285:67-72.</ref> * In 1985, Barrett was the author of the ''Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?'' article in the ] that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral ]. He concluded that ''"commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."''<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). '']'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">, Seidel S, et al. , '']''. 2001;285:67-72.</ref>
Line 372: Line 324:
== See also == == See also ==


* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 381: Line 332:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]



== References == == References ==
Line 387: Line 337:


== External links == == External links ==
*
* ] Tim Bolen Report
*
* - Stephen Barrett * - Stephen Barrett


{{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett, Stephen}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Barrett, Stephen}}
] ]
⚫ ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
⚫ ]
]
]
]




Revision as of 10:27, 24 October 2009

For the Irish politician, see Stephen Barrett (Irish politician).
Stephen J. Barrett, MD
Born1933 (1933)
New York City
Occupation(s)Psychiatrist, Author, Consumer Advocate, Webmaster
Websitewww.quackwatch.org

Stephen J. Barrett (born 1933) is a retired American psychiatrist, author, co-founder of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), and the webmaster of Quackwatch. He runs a number of websites dealing with quackery and health fraud. He focuses on consumer protection, medical ethics, and scientific skepticism. Numerous sources have cited Quackwatch as a useful source for online consumer information.

Biography

Barrett is a 1957 graduate of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and completed his psychiatry residency in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at La Salle Extension University (Chicago). He was a practicing physician until retiring from active practice in 1993, and his medical license is currently listed as "Active-Retired" in good standing. Longtime resident of Allentown, Pennsylvania, Barrett now resides in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

In addition to webmastering his websites, Barrett is a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF). He is an advisor to the American Council on Science and Health, and a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at Pennsylvania State University.

Barrett is the consulting editor for the Consumer Health Library at Prometheus Books, has been a peer-review panelist for at least two medical journals. He has also served on the editorial board of Medscape and The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. According to his website, he "has written more than 2,000 articles and delivered more than 300 talks at colleges, universities, medical schools, and professional meetings. His media appearances include Dateline, the Today Show, Good Morning America, Primetime, Donahue, CNN, National Public Radio, and more than 200 other radio and television talk show interviews."

Barrett has received a number of awards and recognition for his consumer protection work against quackery. Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003. In 1984, he received an FDA Commissioner's Special Citation Award for Public Service in fighting nutrition quackery. He received multiple votes or at least one first-place vote in "10 outstanding skeptics of the 20th century by Skeptical Inquirer magazine. In 1986, he was awarded honorary membership in the American Dietetic Association. Barrett has been profiled in Biography Magazine (1998) and in Time Magazine (2001).

The magazine Spiked-online included Barrett in a survey of 134 persons they termed "key thinkers in science, technology and medicine." When he was asked: "What inspired you to take up science?" he replied that his appreciation of medical science:

"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."

Consumer information

Main article: Quackwatch

The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform for describing and exposing what he and other contributors consider to be quackery and health fraud. The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation that aims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." Barrett's writing is supplemented with contributions from 150+ scientific, technical, and lay volunteers and includes numerous references to published research articles. Barrett defines quackery as "anything involving overpromotion in the field of health," and reserves the word fraud "only for situations in which deliberate deception is involved."

Barrett has become a "lightning rod" for controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside scope." He states he does not give equal time to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects." Barrett is at the forefront of exposing shady aspects of chiropractic.

Barrett is a strong supporter of the HONcode and has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it. In a whole "Special to the Washington Post", extensive coverage of his views on the subject were provided, including his criticisms of many named abusers.

A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine question Barrett and Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine. Donna Ladd, a journalist with The Village Voice, says Barrett relies mostly on negative research to criticize alternative medicine, rejecting most positive case studies as unreliable. She further writes that Barrett insists that most alternative therapies simply should be disregarded without further research. "A lot of things don't need to be tested they simply don't make any sense," he says, pointing to homeopathy, chiropractic, and acupuncture.

Some sources that mention Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch as a useful source for consumer information include website reviews, government agencies, various journals including an article in The Lancet and some libraries.

Selected publications

A partial list of articles Barrett was one of the authors or his authored work was cited include:

  • In 1985, Barrett was the author of the Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam? article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral hair analysis. He concluded that "commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal." His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."
  • A Close Look at Therapeutic Touch - Rosa L, Rosa E, Sarner L, Barrett SJ. (April 1, 1998). JAMA, Vol. 279, No. 13, pp 1005–1010.

A partial list of his (co)authored and (co)edited books include:

  • Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, Kroger M, London WM (2006). (textbook, 8th ed.) McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-248521-3
  • Dubious Cancer Treatment - Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the American Cancer Society
  • The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-855-4
  • Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds - Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, ISBN 0-89043-330-5
  • Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods - by Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). American Medical Association, ISBN 0-89970-525-1
  • The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods - Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-909-7

Collections of articles:

  • Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis, 2007, edited by Bryan Farha, University Press of America, ISBN 978-0-7618-3772-5. Three of the eighteen chapters are written by Barrett.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Pass the Envelope, Please...: Best Physician- Authored Site". MD Net Guide. May/June 2003. Retrieved 2009-04-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. Barrett, Stephen (June 24, 2007). "Curriculum Vitae". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-07-18.
  3. Barrett, Stephen. "License Verification". Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs. Retrieved 01-04-2009. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  4. Wlazelek, Ann (June 13, 2007). "Allentown critic of quacks moves to 'milder winters'". The Morning Call. Retrieved 2007-07-21.
  5. "Prometheus Books Spring-Summer 2007 Trade Catalog" (PDF). pp. p. 63. Retrieved 2007-03-29. {{cite web}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  6. ^ Barrett, Stephen (June 4, 2007). "Stephen Barrett, M.D., Biographical Sketch". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-12.
  7. Williams, Elaine S (April 21, 1999). "The JAMA 1998 Editorial Peer Review Audit". Journal of the American Medical Association. Retrieved 2007-08-12.
  8. "Thanks to Reviewers-2001". Annals of Internal Medicine. December 18, 2001. Retrieved 2007-08-12. {{cite news}}: Text "Pages 1098-1106" ignored (help); Text "Volume 135 Issue 12" ignored (help)
  9. "Introducing the Editorial Board of Medscape". Medscape. Retrieved 2007-09-03.
  10. "The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine". The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  11. Sintay and Hagan. From Farrah Fawcett to Suzanne Somers: Is Alternative Medicine Safe?. Barrett participated on Good Morning America, April 7, 2009.
  12. ^ Joel R. Cooper. Consumer Health Fraud...don't be a victim! Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D., The Medical Reporter
  13. "Ten Outstanding Skeptics of the Century". Scientifically Investigating Paranormal and Fringe Science Claims. Skeptical Inquirer. Retrieved 2007-08-12.
  14. Rosen, Marjorie (October 1998). "Interview with Stephen Barrett, M.D". Biography Magazine. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
  15. ^ Jaroff, Leon (April 30, 2001). "The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks". Time Magazine. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
  16. "What Inspired You? — Index of Survey responses". Spiked-Online. Retrieved 2007-07-23.
  17. "What Inspired You? — Introduction". Spiked-Online. Retrieved 2007-07-23.
  18. ^ Barrett, Stephen. "What Inspired You? — Survey responses — Dr Stephen Barrett". Spiked-Online. Retrieved 2007-07-23.
  19. Baldwin, Fred D. "If It Quacks Like a Duck ..." MedHunters. Retrieved 2007-09-16.
  20. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackwatch mission statement". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-16.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. Barrett, Stephen, MD (January 28, 2003). "150+ Scientific and Technical Advisors". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-16.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. Barrett, Stephen, MD. "Quackery: How Should It Be Defined?". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-16.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT. "Quackery, Fraud and "Alternative" Methods: Important Definitions". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
  24. ^ Dr. Who? Diagnosing Medical Fraud May Require a Second Opinion. by Donna Ladd, The Village Voice, June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006
  25. Barrett SJ. "How do you respond to accusations that your writing is unbalanced?". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-08-16.
  26. Singh S, Ernst E (2008). "The truth about chiropractic therapy". Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine. W.W. Norton. pp. 171–72. ISBN 978-0-393-06661-6.
  27. Christopher Wanjek. Attacking Their HONor: Some Dispute Value of Logo Used to Verify Accuracy, Integrity Of Health Web Site Contents. Special to The Washington Post, April 20, 2004; Page HE01
  28. Hufford DJ. David J Hufford, "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 198-212. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Lawrence J. Schneiderman, "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 191-198.
  29. "Quackwatch". The Good Web Guide. Retrieved 2007-10-13. Quackwatch is without doubt an important and useful information resource and injects a healthy dose of scepticism into reviewing popular health information. Its aim is to investigate questionable claims made in some sectors of what is now a multi-million pound healthcare industry.
  30. Forbes.com, Best of the Web website reviews: Quackwatch.
  31. "Diet Channel Award Review Of Quackwatch". Retrieved 2007-09-18. Quackwatch is a very informative site which informs you about health fraud and gives you advice on many decisions.
  32. Han LF. Selected Web Site Reviews, Quackwatch.com
  33. U.S. News & World Report: The Best of The Web Gets Better
  34. "Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health". U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). July 11, 2002. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  35. "U.S. Department of Health & Human Services". healthfinder.gov. National Health Information Center. Retrieved 2007-09-12.Quackwatch is available from their database.
  36. W Steven Pray. Ethical, Scientific, and Educational Concerns With Unproven Medications. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. Alexandria: 2006. Vol. 70, Iss. 6; pg. O1, 14 pgs. Quackwatch is named as a reliable source together with Skeptical Enquirer, specifically for Pharmacy Course on Unproven Medications and Therapies.
  37. Lawrence B Chonko. If It Walks like a Duck . . . : Concerns about Quackery in Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education. Boulder: Apr 2004. Vol. 26, Iss. 1; pg. 4, 13 pgs. Chonko states “Many of the thoughts on which this article is based are adapted from materials found on this site.” (referring to Quackwatch)
  38. Wallace Sampson, Kimball Atwood IV. Propagation of the Absurd: demarcation of the Absurd revisited. Medical Journal of Australia. Pyrmont: Dec 5-Dec 19, 2005. Vol. 183, Iss. 11/12; pg. 580 - 1. Sampson states that “CAM source information tends to exclude well known critical and objective web pages such as those found on Quackwatch (www.quackwatch.org).”
  39. Eleese Cunningham, Wendy Marcason. Internet hoaxes: How to spot them and how to debunk them. American Dietetic Association. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. Chicago: Apr 2001. Vol. 101, Iss. 4; pg. 460 - 1. Cunningham and Marcason state that “Two Web sites that can be useful in determining hoaxes are www.quackwatch.com and www.urbanlegends.com.”
  40. JAMA Patient Page - Click here: How to find reliable online health information and resources, Journal of the American Medical Association 280:1380, 1998.
  41. Marilynn Larkin. Medical quackery squashers on the web. The Lancet. London: May 16, 1998. Vol. 351, Iss. 9114; pg. 1520 - 2. Names Quackwatch as the premier site for exposing purveyors of health frauds, myths, and fads.
  42. "Southwest Public Libraries". Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  43. "National Network of Libraries of Medicine". Evaluating Health Web Sites, Consumer Health Manual. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  44. "VCU Libraries". Complementary and Alternative Medicine Resource Guide — Fraud and Quackery Resources. Virginia Commonwealth University. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  45. "Rutgers University Libraries". Finding What You Want on the Web: A Guide. Rutgers University Libraries. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  46. "USC Libraries — Electronic Resources — Quackwatch". University of Southern California. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  47. "Medical Center Library". University of Kentucky Libraries. Retrieved 2007-09-12.
  48. Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam? JAMA Vol. 254 No. 8.
  49. Assessment of Commercial Laboratories Performing Hair Mineral Analysis, Seidel S, et al. , JAMA. 2001;285:67-72.
  50. Barrett SJ. "Books and book chapters". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2007-02-12.

External links

Categories: