| Revision as of 16:55, 27 October 2009 editVcnez2017 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,091 edits →Report date October 27 2009, 13:13 (UTC)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:58, 27 October 2009 edit undoYusuf.Abdullah (talk | contribs)547 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Even from his talk page, it is clear that ] has been warned dozens of times for waging edit wars and even received 3RR warnings (2 times). I want someone neutral here. ] (]) 16:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | Even from his talk page, it is clear that ] has been warned dozens of times for waging edit wars and even received 3RR warnings (2 times). I want someone neutral here. ] (]) 16:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I might have made some edits while I was logged out of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ;Comments by other users | ;Comments by other users | ||
Revision as of 16:58, 27 October 2009
Yusuf.Abdullah
Yusuf.Abdullah (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Yusuf.Abdullah/Archive.
Report date October 27 2009, 13:13 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 203.180.31.95 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Evidence submitted by Zencv
Both users made same edits here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3ALove_Jihad&action=historysubmit&diff=322190201&oldid=321690730 and http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3ALove_Jihad&action=historysubmit&diff=322258420&oldid=322227355. And also here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Love_Jihad&action=historysubmit&diff=322259052&oldid=322242075 and http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Love_Jihad&action=historysubmit&diff=322189286&oldid=322135171. Edits of this user in Love Jihad consists of vandalism whereas Anon. user has been reverting the edits after I cleaned up. In the history of the article http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Love_Jihad&action=history, one can see that both editors edited at the same time with a difference of 2 minutes, at 01:29, 27 October 2009 and 01:27, 27 October 2009. Zencv 13:13, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
It is clear that I am being framed because I tried to stop the page banking and vandalism done by the accuser in the article Love Jihad. The user have been repeatedly trying to vandalize the article, and even tried to get the article deleted. See here:Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Love_Jihad As his intention failed, he is trying to ban anyone who is trying to defend the article. A further check in to the contributions made by Zencv suggests that he has made a number of controversial edits to the articles about Terrorist organizations like National Development Front which is linked to Al Qaeda. If anyone should be banned here, this user Zencv, should be banned due to his vandalism in support of the terrorist organizations. Yusuf.Abdullah (talk) 13:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Further more, the IP he had referred (203.180.31.95) is that of the University Library where I am studying. There are hundreds of students here, who use the same IP (and I know a few others,who are Wiki users), as we are having a centralized server. Stop linking the IP with me, as it makes me an easy target for reprisals by Islamic extremists. I request the admins to ban the user Zencv, for the time being from editing the article Love Jihad.
Even from his talk page, it is clear that Zencv has been warned dozens of times for waging edit wars and even received 3RR warnings (2 times). I want someone neutral here. Yusuf.Abdullah (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
I might have made some edits while I was logged out of Misplaced Pages. Yusuf.Abdullah (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by other users
Yusuf, you said "I want someone neutral here.", but neutrality doesn't enter into it, this isn't dispute resolution. If you are truly not related to the IP, you should be happy to have a sockpuppet/checkuser run against it to prove you are not related. tedder (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- By his own admission, IP address belongs to his university library. The fact that he and the IP user made the same edits into the same article within a difference of just 2 minutes says it all. Zencv 16:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
Category: