| Revision as of 16:49, 29 October 2009 editAnomie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators33,900 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:50, 29 October 2009 edit undoBetacommand (talk | contribs)86,927 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :maybe you need to stop being so aggressive, that BRFA lasted several weeks, and has been approved. Also you need to '''read''' the instructions and follow them properly if you want to comment on this page. /sigh ] 16:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | :maybe you need to stop being so aggressive, that BRFA lasted several weeks, and has been approved. Also you need to '''read''' the instructions and follow them properly if you want to comment on this page. /sigh ] 16:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :: Yes, please tone down the aggression. But in IP69.226.103.13's defense, until just now the instructions in {{tl|BT}} and {{tl|BB}} ''did'' say to create a new section (following the boilerplate of most other section-closing templates). ]] 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | :: Yes, please tone down the aggression. But in IP69.226.103.13's defense, until just now the instructions in {{tl|BT}} and {{tl|BB}} ''did'' say to create a new section (following the boilerplate of most other section-closing templates). ]] 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::and he did not do that, instead, he just commented right after the BRFA without creating a section per the instructions. so either way he was incorrect. ] 16:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:50, 29 October 2009
At this point, considering the first bot had issues raised, I asked for it to be stopped, others had raised the issue, and CobraBot's owner did not bother to link to a very relevant ANI discussion, I would like CobraBot 1 deflagged and CobraBot task 2 stopped and the bot owner's responsibility to the community revisited until I have time to figure out whether this bot is a good idea and until the community has time to discuss this issue. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 16:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
It says to put it in a new section. If BAG can't write appropriate directions, then maybe you should find someone who can. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 16:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- maybe you need to stop being so aggressive, that BRFA lasted several weeks, and has been approved. Also you need to read the instructions and follow them properly if you want to comment on this page. /sigh β 16:47, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, please tone down the aggression. But in IP69.226.103.13's defense, until just now the instructions in {{BT}} and {{BB}} did say to create a new section (following the boilerplate of most other section-closing templates). Anomie⚔ 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- and he did not do that, instead, he just commented right after the BRFA without creating a section per the instructions. so either way he was incorrect. β 16:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, please tone down the aggression. But in IP69.226.103.13's defense, until just now the instructions in {{BT}} and {{BB}} did say to create a new section (following the boilerplate of most other section-closing templates). Anomie⚔ 16:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)