| Revision as of 22:36, 29 October 2009 editAbecedare (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,231 edits →1RR limit: sp.← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:11, 30 October 2009 edit undoRadiopathy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,608 edits →1RR limitNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| I'm not going to revert further, after doing a little research regarding liverpool, I don't think it's necessary to link to the UK. I agree with your edit, sorry about any conflicts.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 21:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | I'm not going to revert further, after doing a little research regarding liverpool, I don't think it's necessary to link to the UK. I agree with your edit, sorry about any conflicts.— ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 21:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| == 1RR limit == | |||
| Radiopathy, following ] at the edit-warring noticeboard, you are placed under a 1RR probation, i.e, you are limited to a maximum of one ] per page in any 24 hour period (excepting removal of obvious ], ] or ] violation). This probation will last for a period of 6 months (till April 29, 2010) starting immediately, and violations of this edit-restriction may lead to blocks of progressively increasing lengths.<br> | |||
| If you wish to protest this restriction, you can do so at ], but note that the sanction remains in effect till the 6 month period expires, or till it is lifted explicitly. ] (]) 22:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:11, 30 October 2009
Although I previously said I'm not going to post here,
I'm not going to revert further, after doing a little research regarding liverpool, I don't think it's necessary to link to the UK. I agree with your edit, sorry about any conflicts.— Dædαlus 21:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.