| Revision as of 14:40, 12 December 2005 editPsychonaut (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,685 edits →See also: Academic dishonesty← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:20, 21 December 2005 edit undoJ M Rice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,704 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{merge|Research}} | |||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result. | '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result. | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 21 December 2005
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Research. (Discuss) |
Intellectual dishonesty is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of rhetoric, logical fallacy, fraud, or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result.
Scientists and scholars generally consider plagiarism a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ellipsis, and the unsupported amplification of a relationship.
See also
- In specific fields:
- Honesty
- Ethics
- Epistemic virtue
- Scientific skepticism
- Scientism
- rigour
- Epistemic virtue
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |