Misplaced Pages

Archives

Template:Multicol 2007 1 Template:Multicol-break 2008 2 Template:Multicol-break 2009 3 Template:Multicol-end

My problems

As you probably know, I have been partially banned: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Xx236&diff=314527493&oldid=312602264

I don't care about their opinion about me, if they don't like me, I have other things to do. German Misplaced Pages is probably more "politically correct" and limits nationalistic propaganda. This Misplaced Pages allows "We were the main victims" stories, supported by "sources" created by Western ignorants. Xx236 (talk) 12:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Resp to your question on Talk:Ukrainian Insurgent Army

I was never asked to join that club...

But seriously: thank god (a.k.a. Jimbo Wales) I had never got anything to do with that.... — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 23:26, 22 October 2009

):)--Jacurek (talk) 06:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

• If I understand well your attempt to make the tone more neutral, maybe we could delete also all other details of this crime? What about moving this chapter to some less controversial article, to something about flowers and butterflies? Yours, Rembecki (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC).

October 2009

Please don't alter or remove sourced content, as you repeatedly did in History of Pomerania (1945–present). Skäpperöd (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Did you mean do not touch the article? Please do not claim ownership of the articles you heavily edit. Thanks--Jacurek (talk) 05:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE

I have requested arbitration enforcement here. Skäpperöd (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello Jacurek. It looks to me that you exceeded your voluntary 1RR restriction on 23 October at History of Pomerania (1945-present). Since any removal of content is a revert, here is the first and here is the second. You may be able to avoid sanctions if you will agree to stay away from editing this article for a week. EdJohnston (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

I will.--Jacurek (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Ed,... I keep looking at where I reverted... but the first revert as you gave as an example of reverting and posted on my talk page... I was actually changing my own edit]. I think I actually did not make any mistakes and I did not reverted twice... I'm so careful about not reverting now... I'm not sure if I'm reading that correctly but it does not matter anyway I will sill stay away from the article for a week no problem. Best--Jacurek (talk) 20:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Varsovian

hi Jacurek, I have filled an ANI report on user:Varsovian because of his edit-warring on the London Victory Parade of 1946. Loosmark (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Blocked and restricted

With your inquisitorial exchange with User:Varsovian, you have seriously crossed the line into personal harassment. You were already under WP:DIGWUREN warnings for disruptive behaviour, so you now get sanctioned. You are blocked for a month for edit-warring, battleground behaviour and harassment, and placed on a 1R/d restriction on all Eastern Europe related pages for another six months. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

You have to be kidding. Have you even read the exchange? Varsovian was trying to get more authority and the upper hand for his position by claiming he was living in Warsaw for 15 years and wrote books about it. To that Jacurek simply wanted to check if that is true and in reply he was called an idiot. So if anybody then Varsovian should be placed on restrictions for incivility. btw is Victory parade even an Eastern Europe topic area page? Loosmark (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Pretty ridiculous he? :) I actually trusted Future Perfect at Sunrise and asked him for advice just a minute before his execution here.:) I'm shocked also...I have to gather some thoughts before appealing..--Jacurek (talk) 07:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Jacurek: Can I try to extend an olive branch here? I've already agreed to leave the London Parade article alone for a week and will stick to that commitment (despite Loosmark promptly reverting the article after I said I'd step away from it). I would like to work with you on the article: I suggest that once the week I agree to is up, I remove the current wording of disputed section and we (you and I) then work together to reach a version we both agree on. While we are discussing the article, useful discussion, not shouting at each other or calling each other troll or idiot (sorry about that, did you notice that I apologised yesterday here ?) I will agree to not post anything in that section which you do not agree on and you do the same. What do you think?Varsovian (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

You know what Varsovian, now when you telling me all this nice words you sound more real but I still have my doubts that you are real judging by what was happening until now (sorry). At this point I'm not even sure if I will bother to edit Misplaced Pages at all. I formed by opinion about the whole project. What happened now is also totally unjust. Please don't argue that it was justified because you will never convince me and I have the right to form my own opinion. What I also want to say to you is that your sudden arrival only one month ago already eliminated two long established editors maybe forever. Perhaps you should reflect on that. Goodbye Varsovian. Please do not respond anymore. Thanks--Jacurek (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Varsovian...after thinking about your comment for a while...if I asked for an unblock, would you support me??--Jacurek (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I really don't want to make any comment at all about the correctness of any actions of admins: whether they got something 'wrong' or 'right', I'm sure that they did what they in good faith (and based on their experience) thought is best for WP. But with that said, I very certainly would not oppose any request you made for an unblock and would make no comment at all in any request by you for an unblock other than stating (if you request me to do so) that I do not oppose such request. If you'd like me to state that, just leave a message on my talk page.Varsovian (talk) 11:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Jaruzelski ≠ Democracy

Hi Jacurek. I restored "1990" as the correct year of the end of communism in Poland. The first reason is a strict relationship with officiality: in this note (and you know that coins/notes are one of the biggest evidences of statehood in all history) of February 1, 1990, Poland is still "PRL", in this one of April 20, 1990, the name has changed into "RP" (Question: "Polska" in genitive (of Poland) or adjective (Polish)?)
More generally, Jaruzelki maintanance to power in 1989, did not allow to choose that year as the end of communism in Poland. There are no semi free democracies: a democracy is full, or it is not a democracy (even if, certainly, 1989 events are a masterpiece not only in Polish, but in all European history). So, 1990 becomes a right date not only officially, but even substantially: PZPR disbandment (January 30) and, later, Walesa election to presidency (December 9) mark the real birth of nowadays Democratic Poland. A very, very famous parallelism can clarify you. When the French Revolution began? In 1789 (exactly 200 years before 1989), with the Bastille and first semi free elections. But when France became the "French Republic"? In 1792 , when the Head of State of the Ancien Regime (Louis XVI) was substituted. Thanks for your attention.--Cusio (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that you have a point here...but I can't think about at the moment. Thanks anyway for dropping me a note.--Jacurek (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

On Varsovian

I don't have time to review who dunnit but I want to recommend that Varsovian tries to stay away from Loosmark and Jacurek, and vice versa. A voluntary restriction on commenting about others and reverting them may be a good idea. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC)