| Revision as of 11:25, 1 November 2009 editFinell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,207 edits →Requested move: Oppose← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:36, 1 November 2009 edit undoFinell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,207 edits →Requested move: OpposeNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ] → ] — - --] (]) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad | ] → ] — - --] (]) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad | ||
| '''Oppose:''' First, the name is not a real word. According to ] the article should be called '''Animality studies''' (note the separation of words and ] capitalization. Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from ]; indeed, it appears to represent a non-], and perhaps even a ] viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the ] article, and is therefore an impermissible ]. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for ]. —] ] 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | '''Oppose:''' First, the name is not a real word. According to ] the article should be called '''Animality studies''' (note the separation of words and ] capitalization). Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from ]; indeed, it appears to represent a non-], and perhaps even a ] viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the ] article, and is therefore an impermissible ]. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for ]. —] ] 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 1 November 2009
Requested move
 | It has been proposed in this section that Animality studies be renamed and moved to AnimalityStudies. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
User:Mlundblad/animalitystudies → AnimalityStudies — - --Mlundblad (talk) 04:26, 25 October 2009 (UTC)Mlundblad
Oppose: First, the name is not a real word. According to naming conventions the article should be called Animality studies (note the separation of words and sentence case capitalization). Second, there is no evidence that "animality studies" is generally recognized as a field separate from animal studies; indeed, it appears to represent a non-neutral point of view, and perhaps even a fringe viewpoint. Third, the subject is already treated in more depth in the Animal studies article, and is therefore an impermissible content fork. Fourth, this proposed article has almost no encyclopedic content. Fifth, this proposed article stands by itself: in has no internal links to other relevant Misplaced Pages articles. For these reasons, if this page were moved to article space in its current state, it would be an immediate candidate for deletion. —Finell (Talk) 11:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Category: