Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
::::Oh, and if admins got desysoped for doing drugs, we would not have very many admins. The community has never been anti-drug, my drug use was well know when I started editing in 2006, and when I became an admin, and all through my career. So you should know that any report you make will likely result in another page of people telling you that you are acting ridiculous. ] 18:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
::::Oh, and if admins got desysoped for doing drugs, we would not have very many admins. The community has never been anti-drug, my drug use was well know when I started editing in 2006, and when I became an admin, and all through my career. So you should know that any report you make will likely result in another page of people telling you that you are acting ridiculous. ] 18:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::If you refuse to admit it, then I guess the only recourse is an RfC on admin use. If we have no ability to know when and how your drug use can affect your judgment as an admin, then you can no longer be trusted to have the ops. ] (]) 18:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
On second though I have blocked the IP from anonymous editing for 1 year. It is a static IP and I have every intention of keeping the server and thus the IP for at least a year. That will prevent it from editing while logged out. Chillum23:26, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
tweaking the nipples
Somebody appears to be deliberately creating numerous accounts with user names with "nipple" in them as some sort of test to see if they will be blocked. There has been some extensive discussion on the subject at ANI recently, and whoever is doing this is likely responding to that. None of these accounts are editing at all. I was wondering if we could get the name watching bot to delay reporting "nipple" user names until they have edited at least once. Thanks Beeblebrox (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
I sure don't. I prefer to deal with people who are either on peyote or puffing on a hash pipe. If I don't see some evidence of a hookah on this page in the near future expect an MfDno, a thread at ANIno a RFAR a nasty note on Jimbo's talk page on the subject. Beeblebrox (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I am sorry, I was hoping my username(a type of smoking device) would make it clear to everyone that I regularly smoke herb. Chillum16:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I am a bit confused, what exactly do you find offensive about me dropping acid? Also, how is me doing something equal to encouraging others? Also, didn't I defend your shaved pubis?
Seriously though, the whole world does not have the same hysterical paranoia about drugs that the US and UK share. Malleus you are as always welcome to draw scrutiny towards any on-wiki behavior of mine. If you think I have in anyway disrupted the encyclopedic project then please do something about it.
I really do appreciate you watching my talk to and looking for any opportunity to correct me. In the future it would be nice if you only enforced the standard the Misplaced Pages community has set forth and not attempt to enforce your local drug laws/beliefs. (Oh, and all the drugs I do are class A, I have no time for the b grade crap) Chillum16:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Question
What editing do you do when on drugs? What is the closest proximity of you taking a drug to you making an admin related decision? Do you ever use your secondary account while on drugs? Ottava Rima (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an admittance of taking Class A substances while editing Misplaced Pages. The above questions are not ridiculous, but your statement is incivil. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
RxS, this is your warning for disruptive editing. If you want to continue, please be advise that you are walking off a short pier. Ottava Rima (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
In all due honesty, i personally deem it an odd question. Text easily conceals lies - so regardless on the response you cannot really base any form of action onto a textual reaction. If you can demonstrate bad admin conduct due to drug usage we are talking about something, but even then it would just be "abuse of administrative privileges" - the causes really don't matter. Excirial16:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
There have been no accusations about his administrative actions. Only questions. However, it is odd how defensive your post and RxS's posts are. What are you afraid of in his response? Ottava Rima (talk) 16:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not afraid of anything, I'm just trying to prevent you from harassing another editor. You're the one acting inappropriately here. This question is ridiculous. Please stop. RxS (talk) 17:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I don't believe they are inappropriate or disruptive. So do what you have to do. I won't be around til later to respond but go ahead. RxS (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
If it was a ridiculous question, then you would ignore it. However, your hostile response shows that it is a question that has an answer that you know would damage Chillum and possibly result in his desysopping. As such, your response has done more to harm Chillum than any responses he could make. He could simply have denied any inappropriateness, but you sealed the idea that even his defenders believe he has acted irresponsibly. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
More conditionals: if someone pointed a water pistol at another and said "Give me the Hope Diamond or I'll shoot!" and the other laughed and said "You're out of your tree", by responding and not ignoring the demand the second person nevertheless did not surrender a belief in the silliness of the action. See Excirial for details. Sswonk (talk) 17:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Ottava please stop threatening to make reports about people on my talk page, use their talk page if you must make such baseless comments. If you are going to be filing reports you can include me in thinking the question is ridiculous. If you have any issues with any action I have taken then please feel free to come here and talk, but the drugs I do are not really at issue. I also like to have a beer after work(also a drug). Chillum17:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Chillum, saying that I should come here to talk and then accusing me of making a pointless question are contradictory. One or the other. The drugs you do are at issue, because admin are supposed to be objective. I would like to know if you use drugs while making admin actions. A simple yes or no will suffice. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I will choose which drug use I reveal and which I do not(though the first line of my user page should be a fairly strong hint). I don't owe you any sort of response to personal questions. You can go file a report against me, or go get me desysoped, or whatever, but I am not going indulge your nosy questions and backwards attitudes about drugs. Your first sentence seems to lead me to believe you don't understand the distinction between the actions I do and the drugs I do. I welcome discussion regarding my actions, I only have conversations about my drug usage with people I trust. Chillum17:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and if admins got desysoped for doing drugs, we would not have very many admins. The community has never been anti-drug, my drug use was well know when I started editing in 2006, and when I became an admin, and all through my career. So you should know that any report you make will likely result in another page of people telling you that you are acting ridiculous. Chillum18:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
If you refuse to admit it, then I guess the only recourse is an RfC on admin use. If we have no ability to know when and how your drug use can affect your judgment as an admin, then you can no longer be trusted to have the ops. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)