| Revision as of 02:04, 2 November 2009 edit99.149.84.135 (talk) rv external link← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:06, 3 November 2009 edit undoLacie101 (talk | contribs)11 edits ←Replaced content with 'Anthony B'Tag: blankingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Anthony B | |||
| ''For the Japanese band, see ]''. | |||
| {{Article issues|globalize=December 2008|pov=December 2008|quotefarm=August 2009}} | |||
| {{Feminism sidebar}} | |||
| '''Antifeminism''' is opposition to ] in some or all of its forms. | |||
| == Antifeminist claims and ideas == | |||
| Many antifeminist proponents say the ] has achieved its aims and now seeks higher status for women than for men<ref name="(Wattenberg, B 1994)">{{Cite web|url=http://www.menweb.org/paglsomm.htm|title=Has Feminism Gone Too Far?|accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher=MenWeb |year=1994|author=Wattenberg, B}}</ref><ref name="(Pizzey, E 1999)">{{Cite web|url=http://www.fathersforlife.org/pizzey/how_women_were_taught_to_hate_men.htm|title=How The Women's Movement Taught Women to Hate Men|accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher=Fathers for Life|year=1999|author=Pizzey, Erin}}</ref><ref name="(JSC 2006)">{{Cite web|url=http://www.beverlylahayeinstitute.org/articledisplay.asp?id=10088&department=BLI&categoryid=dotcommentary|title=What Friedan Wrought |accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher=Concerned Women for America |year=2006|author=Janice Shaw Crouse}}</ref>. | |||
| Others consider feminism a destructive force that endangers the family. For example, political scientist ] describes this antifeminist position: | |||
| <blockquote>Serious conservative scholars like ] and F. Carolyn Graglia have maintained that the change of women’s role, from being primarily mothers to self-defined professionals, has been a social disaster that continues to take its toll on the family. Rather than being the culminating point of Western Christian gentility, the movement of women into commerce and politics may be seen as exactly the opposite, the descent by increasingly disconnected individuals into social chaos<ref name="(Gottfried, Paul 2002)">{{Cite web|url=http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/g/g-misc/gottfried051702.htm|title=The Trouble With Feminism|accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher= mensnewsdaily.com|year=2002|author=Gottfried, Paul}}</ref>.</blockquote> | |||
| Antifeminist writer Jim Kalb describes the stance thus: | |||
| <blockquote>To be antifeminist is simply to accept that men and women differ and rely on each other to be different, and to view the differences as among the things constituting human life that should be reflected where appropriate in social attitudes and institutions. By feminist standards all societies have been thoroughly sexist. It follows that to be antifeminist is only to abandon the bigotry of a present-day ideology that sees traditional relations between the sexes as simply a matter of domination and submission, and to accept the validity of the ways in which human beings have actually dealt with sex, children, family life and so on. Antifeminism is thus nothing more than the rejection of one of the narrow and destructive fantasies of an age in which such things have been responsible for destruction and murder on an unprecedented scale<ref name="(Kalb, J 2004)">{{Cite web|url=http://turnabout.ath.cx:8000/node/2|title=Anti-Feminist Page|accessdate=2006-09-30|year=2004|author=Jim Kalb}}</ref>.</blockquote> | |||
| Antifeminists often decry what they view as the ] policies of Western governments, including anti-male discrimination in the areas of reproductive rights, child custody, alimony, and property division in divorce, pointing to statistical figures.<ref></ref> They also object to ], which they usually refer to as ], against men in the form of quotas in the areas of employment, education, politics, and healthcare.{{Citation needed|June 27|date=June 2008}} | |||
| Antifeminists sometimes point to an increase in divorce and "family breakdown" and attribute as its cause the influence of feminism. They also cite that crime<ref name="(NCPA 1997)">{{Cite web|url=http://www.ncpa.org/pi/crime/nov97b.html|title=Juvenile Crime In Fatherless Homes, Public Schools|accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher=National Center for Policy Analysis|year=1997}}</ref>, teenage pregnancy<ref name="(Ellis BJ 2003)">{{cite journal | author=Ellis, BJ et al.| title=Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy?| journal=Child Development| year=2003| volume=74| issue=3| page=801-821| url=http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/fshd/people/ellis/CD%20Ellis%20et%20al.%202003.pdf|format=PDF}}</ref>, and drug abuse<ref name="fathers.com">{{Cite web|url=http://www.fathers.com/research/consequences.html|title=The Consequences of Fatherlessness|accessdate=2006-09-30|publisher=fathers.com}}</ref> are higher among children of ] homes, considering that 66-80% (depending on the source) of divorces are initiated by women and that single mothers are accountable for 49% of all child abuse cases<ref>A study of child abuse in Lansing. Michigan. Joan Ditson and Sharon Shay in Child Abuse and Neglect, Volume 8. 1984.</ref>. | |||
| Furthermore, antifeminists argue that feminist organizations and researchers frequently use fake statistical data and research, pointing out a number of cases where they claim such incidents have occurred.<ref> </ref><ref></ref> | |||
| Antifeminists say that feminists impose tremendous pressure on traditional women by denigrating the role of a traditional housewife: <blockquote>"No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one."<ref>]</ref></blockquote> Instead promoting the business woman, woman leader models, as well encouraging women into competitive environments, where they may not be able to perform as well as males, if only for purely physical reasons. A case illustrated by ]: <blockquote>There is no solid satisfaction in any career for a woman like myself. There is no home, no true freedom, no hope, no joy, no expectation for tomorrow, no contentment. I would rather cook a meal for a man and bring him his slippers and feel myself in the protection of his arms than have all the citations and awards and honors I have received worldwide, including the Ribbon of Legion of Honor and my property and my bank accounts. They mean nothing to me. And I am only one among the millions of sad women like myself.<ref></ref></blockquote> | |||
| Antifeminists point out cases when feminist policies and regulations are detrimental to female self-esteem. For example, women sometimes receive "special treatment" in the form of gender norming, which is lowering physical fitness requirements for women in some professions such as military and rescue services. Women who are hired are expected to handle less physically demanding tasks, which may reduce effectiveness of a unit. These policies make it impossible to refuse hiring women.<ref>WOMEN IN COMBAT, The Center for Military Readiness</ref> | |||
| == Those who have been called Anti-feminists, but eschew the label themselves== | |||
| Feminists such as ], ], ] and ] have been labeled "antifeminists", or holders of antifeminist views, by other feminists <ref>Judith Stacey, ''Is Academic Feminism an Oxymoron?'', Signs, Vol. 25, No. 4, Feminisms at a Millennium. (Summer, 2000), pp. 1189-1194</ref><ref>Elizabeth Kamarck Minnich, Review: 'Feminist Attacks on Feminisms: Patriarchy's Prodigal Daughters', Feminist Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1. (Spring, 1998), pp. 159-175</ref> because of their positions regarding oppression and lines of thought within feminism (which Sommers has controversially defined as ]).<ref>''BITCHfest: Ten Years of Cultural Criticism from the Pages of Bitch Magazine'',by Margaret Cho (Foreword), Lisa Jervis (Editor), Andi Zeisler (Editor), 2006</ref> Authors Patai and Koertge argue that by labeling these women "anti-feminists", the intention is to silence them and prevent any debate on the state of feminism. It represents "an enormous extension of women's power, allowing any sort of criticism of either women or feminist ideas to fall under the watchful eye of their ideological guardians."<ref>Patai and Koertge, ''Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies'', (2003)</ref>. | |||
| Other feminists such as media critic ] claim that Paglia, Sommers, Elshtain and Fox-Genovese use the feminist label as a ruse. In describing what she believes is a method of "so-called rebel feminists" who use "Leftist lingo to gain rebellious credibility in a supposedly politically correct culture," she identifies what she argues is a contradiction: " ecome vocally indignant at refusal to tolerate 'dissenting feminist voice'" and then "o directly to the media. Do not pass up the college lecture circuit. Do not turn down close to $200K in Right Wing grants" and wait "for the money to come rolling in." She goes on to further counter claims of silencing debate or criticism: "Use your role as 'rebel feminist' to denounce every feminist concern other than women's economic advancement." and "(...) substantiate your claims by using faulty research methods and superficial interviews. Rarely contact the authors, activists and psychologists you libel." <ref name="organizenow.net"> {{Dead link|date=October 2009}}</ref> | |||
| ==Critique of Antifeminism== | |||
| Pozner writes: | |||
| <blockquote> | |||
| Anti-feminist women who attack feminism under the guise of the liberal cause of women's advancement are far less easy to dismiss than right-wing critics such as ] or ]. Yet Schlafly and Sommers are both listed in the speakers guide of the ], a group which routinely gives $10K grants to student groups to bring conservative lecturers to their campuses. Sommers is also a speaker for the ], another right think tank, which dishes out the dollars to sponsor lecturers who "counter the Marxists, radical feminists, deconstructionists, and other 'politically correct' types on your campus." The media seize the rhetoric of self-proclaimed "feminist dissenters" such as Sommers and Rophie as proof that feminism is failing women ("See," we are supposed to think, "even the feminists now admit their movement is passé"). They are compensated highly for their complicity: Sommers received over $164,000 in grants from the conservative Olin, Bradley and Carthage foundations for "Who Stole Feminism", in addition to a six-figure advance from her publisher, Simon and Schuster.<ref name="organizenow.net"/> | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| Some criticism of antifeminism has focused on studies of the behavior of children from fatherless homes, labeling them misleading and alarmist:<blockquote>Research on the impact of father involvement on children provides evidence that high levels of paternal participation tends to increase children's cognitive competence, empathy, and internal locus of control. These children are also characterized by reduced sex-stereotyped beliefs. However, these positive outcomes may result because the fathers sampled wanted to be and enjoyed being involved in childcare, not just because they were involved per se.<ref></ref></blockquote> | |||
| Australian sociologist ] argues that although children of two-parent families generally do better psychologically and educationally than children of single-parent families, that does not necessarily mean that correlation between these two factors implies that one is the cause of the other, and that neither divorce, nor fatherlessness in themselves are the cause of it. In a discussion paper he uses studies to argue that it is the quality of parenting and the child's relationship with the parents that plays the main role. That children are negatively influenced by the situations in families characterized by violence, psychological problems, substance abuse, or economic insecurity and that it is the couples where such situations are frequent that are more likely to get divorced.<ref></ref> | |||
| In an article in ''American Psychologist'' (June 1999), Louise B. Silverstein and Carl F. Auerbach conclude that "the stability of the emotional connection and the predictability of the caretaking relationship are the significant variables that predict positive child adjustment." They also state that "a wide variety of family structures can support positive child outcomes."<ref>http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/deconstruct.php; (proper source required)</ref> | |||
| == Antifeminist organizations == | |||
| {{As of|2008}} the most successful antifeminist organization in the US is STOP ERA, now known as ], founded by ] in October 1972. Schlafly successfully mobilised thousands of people to block the passage of the ] in the USA<ref name="wse2">{{cite book | title=Women's Studies Encyclopedia| url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unisouthernqld/Doc?id=10017897&ppg=106| last=Tierney| first=Helen|year=1999| publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated| location=Westport, CT, USA| page=95}}</ref>. It was Schlafly too who forged links between STOP ERA and other conservative organizations, as well as single-issue groups against abortion, pornography, gun control, and unions. By integrating STOP ERA with the so-called ] she was able to leverage a wider range of technological, organisational and political resources, successfully targeting pro-feminist candidates for defeat.<ref name="wse2"/>{{cite book | title=Women's Studies Encyclopedia| url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unisouthernqld/Doc?id=10017897&ppg=106| last=Tierney| first=Helen|year=1999| publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated| location=Westport, CT, USA| page=95}}</ref> | |||
| Outside the United States, organised antifeminist groups have been conspicuously less successful. In ], Babette Francis has led Endeavour Forum (formerly "Women Who Want to be Women" for over twenty five years, but has failed to halt ratification of the ] ] (CEDAW), as well as the eventual introduction of ] in Australia, and the successive liberalisation of laws related to ] within every state and territory . ] has similarly failed to halt ] and decriminalisation of ], while Britain has never had an organised antifeminist group of its own, and New Zealand's "Women for Life" (1983-2004) ceased to exist several years ago. | |||
| Even though STOP ERA in the United States was successful in derailing the ratification of the ERA, it was otherwise ineffective when it came to stopping feminist legislation. The Equal Rights Amendment was the only major legislative failure of the women's movement in the USA (1963 - 1982).{{Citation needed|date=February 2009}} | |||
| == See also == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==References== | |||
| <references/> | |||
| ==Notes== | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| ==Further reading== | |||
| ===Literature about antifeminism=== | |||
| * ''Redefining the New Woman, 1920-1963 (Antifeminism in America: A Collection of Readings from the Literature of the Opponents to U.S. Feminism, 1848 to the Present)'', Howard-Zophy | |||
| * ''Un-American Womanhood: Antiradicalism, Antifeminism, and the First Red Scare'', Kim E. Nielsen | |||
| * ], ''Right-Wing Women: The Politics of Domesticated Females'' (1983; ISBN 0-399-50671-3). | |||
| * ], ''Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women'' (1992; ISBN 0-385-42507-4) | |||
| * Kampwirth, Karen. 2006. “Resisting the Feminist Threat: Antifeminist Politics in Post-Sandinista Nicaragua” NWSA Journal. Vol. 18, No 2. (Summer). pp. 73-100. | |||
| * Kampwirth, Karen. 2003. “Arnoldo Alemán Takes on the NGOs: Antifeminism and the New Populism in Nicaragua” Latin American Politics and Society. Vol. 45. No. 2. (Summer) 2003. pp. 133-158. | |||
| * Kampwirth, Karen. 1998. "Feminism, Antifeminism, and Electoral Politics in Post-War Nicaragua and El Salvador" Political Science Quarterly Vol. 113, No. 2. (Summer) pp. 259-279. | |||
| * Cynthia D. Kinnard, ''Antifeminism in American Thought: An Annotated Bibliography'' (Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., 1986, ISBN 0-8161-8122-5) | |||
| * ], ''The Female Thing: Dirt, Sex, Envy, Vulnerability '' (Pantheon, 2006). | |||
| * Jane J. Mansbridge: ''Why We Lost the ERA,'' Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986 | |||
| *{{cite book|author=Schreiber, Ronnee|title=Righting Feminism|date=2008|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-533181-3}} | |||
| * G. Swanson, ''Antifeminism in America: A Historical Reader'' (2000) ISBN 0-8153-3437-0 | |||
| ===Antifeminist literature=== | |||
| * ], ] (2007) ISBN 0553384279 | |||
| * Alan J. Barron, ''The Death of Eve: Women, Liberation, Disintegration'' (1986) ISBN 0949667366 | |||
| * Alan Carlson, ''The Family in America: Searching for Social Harmony in the Industrial Age'' (2003) ISBN 0765805367 | |||
| * Alan Carlson, ''Family Questions: Reflections on the American Social Crisis'' (1991) ISBN 1560005556 | |||
| * ], ''Brave New Family'' (1990; essay collection) ISBN 089870314X | |||
| * Thomas Fleming, ''The Politics of Human Nature'' (1988) ISBN 1-56000-693-5 | |||
| * Maggie Gallagher, ''The Abolition of Marriage: How We Destroy Lasting Love'' (1996) ISBN 0895264641 | |||
| * ], ''Men and Marriage'' (1992) ISBN 0882894447 | |||
| * ], '']: A Theory of Male Dominance'' (1993; originally published 1971) ISBN 0812692373 | |||
| * Steven Goldberg, '']'' (1977) ISBN 0812692373 | |||
| * F. Carolyn Graglia, ''Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism'' (1998) ISBN 0965320863 | |||
| * Mary A. Kassian, ''The Feminist Mistake'' (2005) ISBN 1581345704 | |||
| * Linda Kelly, (2003) | |||
| * Myron Magnet, ''Modern Sex: Liberation and Its Discontents'' (2001) ISBN 1566633842 | |||
| * Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young ''Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture'' (2001) ISBN 0773522727 | |||
| * Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, '''''Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men''''' (2006) ISBN 0773528628 | |||
| * John Piper and Wayne A. Grudem, ''Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood'' (1991) ISBN 0891075860 | |||
| * Mary Pride, ''The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality'' (1985) ISBN 0891073450 | |||
| * Phyllis Schlafly, ''The Power of the Positive Woman'' (1977) ISBN 0-87000-373-9 | |||
| * Phyllis Schlafly, ''Feminist Fantasies'' (2003) ISBN 1890626465 | |||
| * Howard Schwartz, ''The Revolt of the Primitive: An Inquiry into the Roots of Political Correctness'' (2003) ISBN 0765805375 | |||
| * Lionel Tiger, ''The Decline of Males'' (2000) ISBN 0312263112 | |||
| * Esther Vilar, ''The Manipulated Man'' (1972) ISBN 0953096424 | |||
| * Danielle Crittenden, ''What Our Mothers Didn't Tell Us'' (2000) ISBN 0-684-85959-9 | |||
| * Midge Decter, ''The New Chastity and Other Arguments Against Women's Liberation'' (1974) ISBN 0-399-50307-2 | |||
| * Thomas Ellis, (2005) ISBN 0-9762613-1-6 | |||
| * Thomas Fleming, ''The Politics of Human Nature'' (1988) ISBN 1-56000-693-5 | |||
| * Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, ''Feminism is Not the Story of My Life'' (1996) ISBN 0-385-46790-7 | |||
| * ], ''Men and Marriage'' (1992) ISBN 0-88289-444-7 | |||
| * F. Carolyn Graglia, ''Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism'' (1998) ISBN 0-9653208-6-3 | |||
| * Richard T. Hise, ''The War Against Men'' (2004) ISBN 1-930859-61-9 | |||
| * Domestic Violence: The 12 Things You Aren't Supposed to Know; Thomas P. James, Aventine Press, 2003, ISBN 1-59330-122-7 | |||
| * ], ''The De-moralization Of Society'' (1996) ISBN 0-679-76490-9 | |||
| * Christina Hoff-Sommers, ''The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men'' (2001) ISBN 0-684-84957-7 | |||
| * Christina Hoff-Sommers, ''Who Stole Feminism?'' (1995) ISBN 0-684-80156-6 | |||
| * Mary A. Kassian, ''The Feminist Mistake'' (2005) ISBN 1-58134-570-4 | |||
| * Linda Kelly, (2003) | |||
| * The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex & Power in the Real World; Karen Lehrman, 1997, ISBN 0-385-47481-4 | |||
| * Myron Magnet, ''Modern Sex: Liberation and Its Discontents'' (2001) ISBN 1-56663-384-2 | |||
| * Harvey C. Mansfield, ''Manliness'' (2006) ISBN 0-300-10664-5 | |||
| * Diane Medved and Dan Quayle, ''The American Family: Discovering the Values That Make Us Strong'' (1997) ISBN 0-06-092810-7 | |||
| * Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, ''Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men'' (2006) ISBN 0-7735-2862-8 | |||
| * Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young ''Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture'' (2001) ISBN 0-7735-2272-7 | |||
| * Kate O'Beirne, ''Women Who Make the World Worse'' (2005) ISBN 1-59523-009-2 | |||
| * John Piper and Wayne A. Grudem, '']'' (1991) ISBN 0-89107-586-0 | |||
| * Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies; Daphne Patai and Noreta Koertge, 1995, ISBN 0-465-09827-4 | |||
| * ], (Hamlyn, 1982; ISBN 0-600-20551-7) | |||
| * ], ''The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality'' (1985) ISBN 0-89107-345-0 | |||
| * Phyllis Schlafly, ''Feminist Fantasies'' (2003) ISBN 1-890626-46-5 | |||
| * Howard Schwartz, ''The Revolt of the Primitive: An Inquiry into the Roots of Political Correctness'' (2003) ISBN 0-7658-0537-5 | |||
| * ], ''A Generation of Vipers'' (1942) ISBN 1-56478-146-1 | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| * , by Elizabeth Anderson, review of "Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology" concluding " failure by its own evaluative standards of civility and avoiding gross error, tribalism, cynicism, and political correctness." | |||
| * | |||
| * Anti-feminist blog by Elisabeth Kay | |||
| * Blog devoted to antifeminism and men's rights issues | |||
| {{Feminism}} | |||
| {{Masculism}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 03:06, 3 November 2009
Anthony B