| Revision as of 09:13, 10 November 2009 editPhil Bridger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,807 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:52, 10 November 2009 edit undoLibStar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers114,291 edits →Tjampuhan HotelNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :*The fact that ] had a home here does not automatically make it notable (see ]). Here is a gbook link to the book you mentioned: . It shows the first page of the chapter. It certainly looks significant, but our ] say we prefer ''multiple sources''. From looking at the book, I suspect more sources exist, and I encourage anyone else that knows of any sources to post them. ''']''' <sup>] · ]</sup> 03:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | :*The fact that ] had a home here does not automatically make it notable (see ]). Here is a gbook link to the book you mentioned: . It shows the first page of the chapter. It certainly looks significant, but our ] say we prefer ''multiple sources''. From looking at the book, I suspect more sources exist, and I encourage anyone else that knows of any sources to post them. ''']''' <sup>] · ]</sup> 03:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' One clear source is enough. ''']''' (]) 06:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' One clear source is enough. ''']''' (]) 06:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| : what happened to significant coverage test as per ]? otherwise we'd be creating billions of articles with one clear source. ] (]) 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep'''. are some more sources documenting the Spies connection. ] (]) 09:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. are some more sources documenting the Spies connection. ] (]) 09:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 10 November 2009
Tjampuhan Hotel
- Tjampuhan Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:CORP. no real third party coverage LibStar (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose, hotel is mentioned in literature and should be expanded. Gryffindor (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- please provide evidence of how it meets WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is WP:CORP the sole criteria for consideration? --Merbabu (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- feel free to show if it meets WP:N or WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is WP:CORP the sole criteria for consideration? --Merbabu (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete A gsearch turns up quite a bit, but all of it seems to be promotional in nature. Wading through those results, I couldn't find anything from reliable sources. Jujutacular 02:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular 02:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular 02:32, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Qworty (talk) 02:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - article did not assert it's notability. I have added this (although probably poorly) - ie, it is the site of Walter Spies's 1930's home, one of the most important figures of 20th century, indeed, modern Bali. The hotel has it's own chapter in "William Warren, Jill Gocher (2007). Asia's legendary hotels: the romance of travel. Singapore: Periplus Editions. p. 202. ISBN 978-0-7946-0174-4.". Remember, AFD is about subject notability, not article quality. --Merbabu (talk) 03:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- The fact that Walter Spies had a home here does not automatically make it notable (see WP:INHERIT). Here is a gbook link to the book you mentioned: . It shows the first page of the chapter. It certainly looks significant, but our guidelines say we prefer multiple sources. From looking at the book, I suspect more sources exist, and I encourage anyone else that knows of any sources to post them. Jujutacular 03:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep One clear source is enough. DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- what happened to significant coverage test as per WP:GNG? otherwise we'd be creating billions of articles with one clear source. LibStar (talk) 11:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Here are some more sources documenting the Spies connection. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)