Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:48, 11 November 2009

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

ANI notice

Hello, Jayjg. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have an interest in adding your comments. The thread is User:Ludvikus revisited. Thank you. --Ludvikus (talk) 14:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Human suit recreated as Human disguise

This is a notice to all who participated in the recent AfD of Human suit, here, that resulted in a consensus for delete. This article has been recreated as "Human disguise", and has been nominated for deletion: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Human disguise. Thank you. Verbal chat 21:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Soncino Talmud

Thanks for your note. I'll keep up the editing. -- Dauster (talk) 11:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Kadima

Hi Jayjg, An editor has been continuing an edit war on Kadima. I have contributed much to the lead and the body of the article and have tried to make it as clear and comprehensive as possible. I chose my words very carefully, noting that the party formed itself as of the center, etc. A New York Times article briefly but descriptively goes into detail to note the party's leftward shift. Many major news groups have been referring to Kadima as center-left, including the Washington Post, BBC, Reuters, and The Economist. So the last sentence in the lead reads: "...of the political center and center-left...", in addition to the various other descriptions it gives itself before. I have also noted that the party is (since its formation through now) is part of the left-wing bloc of parties in the Knesset. (See all sources in Talk:Kadima) Yet this user is being stubborn and disregarding this and all other sources for a mere article in The London Times that called Kadima "center-right." If you could help with the discussion article I'd appreciate it, or refer me to another admin who can. Thank you. --Shamir1 (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Editing scientific articles

Please take your reasoning regarding OR to the talk page, where you do not seem to have contributed. I am not totally convinced that you are correct. --Bduke (Discussion) 04:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

University of Reading Science & Technology Centre

At Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/University of Reading Science & Technology Centre you wrote:

 The result was merge

I have no desire to dispute this consensus, but it isn't clear from the stated decision what article this article was to be merged with/into. At least two articles were suggested during the discussion (University of Reading and Whiteknights Park) but I can see no sign in the histories of either article that any such merge has taken place.

Could you help me understand how the decision has been executed. Thanks. -- Starbois (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Apologies; I hadn't seen your commit comment when you redirected the article. Please disregard. -- Starbois (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

?

If an author has been published on a certain website - in this case CODOH - and I wish to refer to the author's published words - then I fail to see how that website can be an unjustified source. Dr E P Lockstone (talk) 21:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Lockstone

ESCA

You are editing the essay to mean the opposite of what it was originally suggesting. If you want to do that, write your own essay. I also do not appreciate your suggestion that I am behaving improperly, and I would kindly appreciate it if you would not write messages to me anymore.Likebox (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)