Revision as of 03:27, 24 December 2005 editPolarscribe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,997 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:27, 24 December 2005 edit undoPolarscribe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,997 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This AFD ran it's course and ended 07:50, 19 December. FCYTravis' reinstatement of the AFD today is wrong and part of his personal campaign of bullying ]. His labelling anon votes here as "meatpuppets" and "sockpuppets" without any evidence is wrong and overreaching. Discounting votes of others is wrong. This AFD is clearly part of your personal campaign of bullying ] through AFD and RFC. I invite anyone who doubts this to take look at your edit history. FCYTravis is overstepping his privileges in his recent activities against ], which are beginning to look more and more like bullying through abuse of process. ] 03:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | This AFD ran it's course and ended 07:50, 19 December. FCYTravis' reinstatement of the AFD today is wrong and part of his personal campaign of bullying ]. His labelling anon votes here as "meatpuppets" and "sockpuppets" without any evidence is wrong and overreaching. Discounting votes of others is wrong. This AFD is clearly part of your personal campaign of bullying ] through AFD and RFC. I invite anyone who doubts this to take look at your edit history. FCYTravis is overstepping his privileges in his recent activities against ], which are beginning to look more and more like bullying through abuse of process. ] 03:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
:There is nothing abusive about filing a good-faith RFC or making good-faith AFD nominations (nominations, I note, which are clearly being supported by consensus.) If you have an issue with my conduct, I invite you to follow procedures and open an RFC. ] 03:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | :There is nothing abusive about making a (disputable) call in discounting obvious and blatant meatpuppets or filing a good-faith RFC or making good-faith AFD nominations (nominations, I note, which are clearly being supported by consensus.) If you have an issue with my conduct, I invite you to follow procedures and open an RFC. ] 03:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:27, 24 December 2005
This AFD ran it's course and ended 07:50, 19 December. FCYTravis' reinstatement of the AFD today is wrong and part of his personal campaign of bullying User:Larvatus. His labelling anon votes here as "meatpuppets" and "sockpuppets" without any evidence is wrong and overreaching. Discounting votes of others is wrong. This AFD is clearly part of your personal campaign of bullying User:Larvatus through AFD and RFC. I invite anyone who doubts this to take look at your edit history. FCYTravis is overstepping his privileges in his recent activities against User:Larvatus, which are beginning to look more and more like bullying through abuse of process. FeloniousMonk 03:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- There is nothing abusive about making a (disputable) call in discounting obvious and blatant meatpuppets or filing a good-faith RFC or making good-faith AFD nominations (nominations, I note, which are clearly being supported by consensus.) If you have an issue with my conduct, I invite you to follow procedures and open an RFC. FCYTravis 03:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)