Revision as of 18:29, 18 November 2009 editNug (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,427 edits →Digwuren CU results← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:57, 18 November 2009 edit undoBrandon (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,371 edits replyNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:The results may affect the outcome of an active ArbCom case and the committee has more information on the user than I do. Myself or another CU will post the results in a few days. ] (]) 11:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | :The results may affect the outcome of an active ArbCom case and the committee has more information on the user than I do. Myself or another CU will post the results in a few days. ] (]) 11:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --] (]) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ::Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --] (]) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. ] (]) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:57, 18 November 2009
Brandon is taking a short nap and will be back on Misplaced Pages next month. |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Digwuren CU results
Can you give us at least some information about Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Digwuren results? Why did you not make the results public but sent them to ArbCom? Offliner (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- The results may affect the outcome of an active ArbCom case and the committee has more information on the user than I do. Myself or another CU will post the results in a few days. Brandon (talk) 11:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. Brandon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)