Revision as of 23:05, 25 November 2009 editSkäpperöd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,457 edits partial rv: removal of sourced differing interpretations is not a compromise. add about post-Communist sources. rm nowakowski - bibliography link.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 25 November 2009 edit undoSkäpperöd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,457 editsm →Treaty of Pyzdry in Polish historiography: spNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
After ], when the area of former Pomerania-Stolp became Polish as part of the so-called "]", historians in ] offered different interpretations of the 1390 treaty of Pzydry, which included an oath of vassalage of Wartislaw VII to Jagiello without specifying a territory:<ref name=Czaplinski12/> Gòrski (1947), Labuda (1948),<ref name=Branig2930>{{cite book|last=Branig|first=Hans |coauthors=Werner Buchholz|title=Geschichte Pommerns, Volume I, Vom Werden des neuzeitlichen Staates bis zum Verlust der staatlichen Selbständigkeit, 1300-1648|editor=Werner Buchholz|publisher=Böhlau|date=1997|pages=29-30|isbn=3412071897}}</ref> ] (1960),<ref>Juliusz Bardach, ''Historia państwa i prawa Polski, Volume 1'', Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe, 1964, p.589</ref> Fenrych (1961)<ref name=Branig2930/> and ] (1970)<ref name=Czaplinski12>Władysław Czapliński, Tadeusz Ładogórski, ''Atlas historyczny polski'', Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych, 1970, p.12</ref> said the oath was for all territory held by Wartislaw VII, including Pomerania-Stolp; Mitkowski (1946) and Zientara (1969) said the oath was for the territory Waritislaw received as fiefs from Jagiello (especially Naklo/Nakel); Mielcarz (1976) said the oath was binding only Wartislaw himself, as a person, to Jagiello; and Gumowski (1951) said the document shows Wartislaw giving a general solemn promise of service.<ref name=Branig2930/> | After ], when the area of former Pomerania-Stolp became Polish as part of the so-called "]", historians in ] offered different interpretations of the 1390 treaty of Pzydry, which included an oath of vassalage of Wartislaw VII to Jagiello without specifying a territory:<ref name=Czaplinski12/> Gòrski (1947), Labuda (1948),<ref name=Branig2930>{{cite book|last=Branig|first=Hans |coauthors=Werner Buchholz|title=Geschichte Pommerns, Volume I, Vom Werden des neuzeitlichen Staates bis zum Verlust der staatlichen Selbständigkeit, 1300-1648|editor=Werner Buchholz|publisher=Böhlau|date=1997|pages=29-30|isbn=3412071897}}</ref> ] (1960),<ref>Juliusz Bardach, ''Historia państwa i prawa Polski, Volume 1'', Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe, 1964, p.589</ref> Fenrych (1961)<ref name=Branig2930/> and ] (1970)<ref name=Czaplinski12>Władysław Czapliński, Tadeusz Ładogórski, ''Atlas historyczny polski'', Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych, 1970, p.12</ref> said the oath was for all territory held by Wartislaw VII, including Pomerania-Stolp; Mitkowski (1946) and Zientara (1969) said the oath was for the territory Waritislaw received as fiefs from Jagiello (especially Naklo/Nakel); Mielcarz (1976) said the oath was binding only Wartislaw himself, as a person, to Jagiello; and Gumowski (1951) said the document shows Wartislaw giving a general solemn promise of service.<ref name=Branig2930/> | ||
In post-Communist Polish historiography, Kosman (1995) interprets the treaty in a way that Pomerania-Stolp became a Polish fief,<ref>Marceli Kosman, ''Na tropach bohaterów Krzyżaków'', Książka i Wiedza, 1995, ISBN 830512746X, p.27</ref> while Czacharowski (2001) says it was an alliance and refers to Naklo being held as a Polish fief.<ref>{{cite book|last=Czacharowski|first=Antoni|title=Bürgertum und Rittertum im Spätmittelalter|publisher=Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika|date=2001|pages=146-148|isbn=8323113041}}</ref> With respect to the |
In post-Communist Polish historiography, Kosman (1995) interprets the treaty in a way that Pomerania-Stolp became a Polish fief,<ref>Marceli Kosman, ''Na tropach bohaterów Krzyżaków'', Książka i Wiedza, 1995, ISBN 830512746X, p.27</ref> while Czacharowski (2001) says it was an alliance and refers to Naklo being held as a Polish fief.<ref>{{cite book|last=Czacharowski|first=Antoni|title=Bürgertum und Rittertum im Spätmittelalter|publisher=Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika|date=2001|pages=146-148|isbn=8323113041}}</ref> With respect to the discourse in Polish historiography, Branig and ] (1997) say that however the treaty is interpreted, it did not have any significance for the future.<ref name=Branig30>{{cite book|last=Branig|first=Hans |coauthors=Werner Buchholz|title=Geschichte Pommerns, Volume I, Vom Werden des neuzeitlichen Staates bis zum Verlust der staatlichen Selbständigkeit, 1300-1648|editor=Werner Buchholz|publisher=Böhlau|date=1997|page=30|isbn=3412071897}}</ref> | ||
==Dukes== | ==Dukes== |
Revision as of 23:05, 25 November 2009
Pomerania-Stolp (Template:Lang-de, Template:Lang-pl) was one of the partitions of the Duchy of Pomerania (Template:Lang-de). It was created from another Teilherzogtum of the Duchy of Pomerania, Pomerania-Wolgast, to satisfy Bogislaw V, Duke of Pomerania in 1368, and existed until 1459, when it was inherited by Eric II of Pomerania-Wolgast. In 1474, it was merged to the partition of Bogislaw X, Duke of Pomerania, who four years later became the sole duke of Pomerania.
Background
Main article: Partitions of the Duchy of Pomerania Further information: Duchy of Pomerania and Pomerania during the Late Middle AgesThe Duchy of Pomerania was partitioned several times to satisfy the claims of the male members of the ruling House of Pomerania dynasty. The partitions were named after the ducal residences: Pomerania-Barth, -Demmin, -Rügenwalde, -Stettin, -Stolp, and -Wolgast. None of the partitions had a hereditary character, the members of the House of Pomerania inherited the duchy in common. The duchy thus continued to exist as a whole despite its division.
Creation: Partition of 1368/72
Main articles: Duchy of Pomerania and Pomerania during the Late Middle AgesAfter the death of Barnim IV of Pomerania-Wolgast in 1366, an armed conflict arose when Barnim's brother Bogislaw V refused to share his power with Barnim's sons, Wartislaw VI and Bogislaw VI, and his other brother, Wartislaw V, who in turn allied with Mecklenburg to enforce their claims. On May 25, 1368, a compromise was negotiated in Anklam, which was made a formal treaty on June 8, 1372 in Stargard, and resulted in a partition of Pomerania-Wolgast.
Bogislaw V received most of the Farther Pomeranian parts. Excepted was the land of Neustettin, which was to be ruled by his brother Wartislaw V, and was integrated into Bogislaw's part-duchy only after his death in 1390. This eastern partition became known as Pomerania-Stolp.
History
Main articles: Duchy of Pomerania and Pomerania during the Late Middle AgesThe situation of the descendants of Bogislaw V, who ruled Pomerania-Stolp, differed somewhat from the situation of their western counterparts. The area was more sparsely settled and dominated by powerful noble families, so not much income could be derived by the dukes. On the other hand, the Stolpian branch of the House of Pomerania had relatives among the royal houses of Denmark and Poland. Casimir IV and Elisabeth, the children of Bogislaw V and his first wife Elisabeth, the daughter of Casimir III of Poland, where both raised at the Polish court in Kraków. Elisabeth would become Holy Roman Empress after her marriage with Charles IV, and Casimir was adopted by and designated heir of his grandfather. Yet, his ambitions were thwarted when Ludwig of Hungary overruled the testament of Casimir of Poland in 1370, Casimir of Pomerania-Stolp only for a short time took the land of Dobrin as a fief.
During the Polish-Teutonic wars, the Pomeranian dukes changed sides between Poland and the knights very frequently. Wartislaw VII and Barnim V allied with the Teutonic Order. In 1390 however, after Casimir III of Poland had promised to hand part of the heritage of Casimir IV, Wartislaw VII's stepbrother, over to Wartislaw, the latter concluded an alliance with Poland and received the Polish castellany of Naklo (Nakel) and probably some adjacent areas as a fief in return, declaring himself a vassal of Casimir III in Pyzdry. Wartislaw's brothers Barnim V and Bogislaw VIII however took on a friendly attitude towards the Teutonic Order, and Naklo returned to the Polish Crown after Wartislaw's death.
Eric II of Pomerania-Stolp, grand-grandchild of Danish king Valdemar IV in contrast became king of the Kalmar Union in 1397. Eric however failed in his most ambitious plan, to make Bogislaw IX Of Pomerania-Stolp king of both the Kalmar Union and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Eric had to leave Denmark in 1449 and ruled Pomerania-Rügenwalde, a small partition of Pomerania-Stolp, until his death in 1459.
Pomerania-Stolp was a crucial point in the knights' land supply route. Bogislaw VIII of Pomerania-Stolp allied with both the Teutonic Knights and Poland, but supported the latter after the war had started in 1409 by blocking his lands for the knights' troops and allowing his nobles to kidnap those who were travelling his lands. For his aid, he was granted the Lauenburg (now Lębork) and Bütow (now Bytów) areas (Lauenburg and Bütow Land) and others, but those were lost in the First Peace of Thorn in 1411.
Gain of Lauenburg and Bütow Land (1455-1467)
Further information: Lauenburg and Bütow LandEric II of Pomerania-(Wolgast)-Stolp allied with the Polish king Casimir IV in his Thirteen Years' War against the Teutonic Knights. On January 3, 1455, he in turn was granted the Lauenburg and Bütow Land at the Pomerelian frontier. When Lauenburg was retaken by the knights in 1459, the Polish king was upset and ravaged the Stolp area. Eric reconciled with the king on August 21, 1466, and bought the town from the knights on October 11, six days before the Second Peace of Thorn, that was signed by Eric in 1467.
Bogislaw X becomes sole ruler of the duchy of Pomerania (1478)
Main articles: Duchy of Pomerania and Bogislaw X, Duke of PomeraniaPomerania-Wolgast was reunited following the death of both Barnim VII and Barnim VIII in 1451. Both dukes died of the Black Death. The same disease caused the death of Joachim of Pomerania-Stettin (also in 1451), Ertmar and Swantibor, children of Wartislaw X, and Otto III of Pomerania-Stettin (all in 1464). Thus, the line of Pomerania-Stettin had died out.
The extinction of the House of Pomerania-Stettin triggered a conflict about inheritance with the Margraviate of Brandenburg. In the Treaty of Soldin of 1466, a compromise was negotiated: Wartislaw X and Eric II, the dukes of Pomerania, took over Pomerania-Stettin as a Brandenburgian fief. This was disputed already during the same year by the emperor, who intervened against the Brandenburgian overlordship of Pomerania. This led to a series of further warfare and truces, that were ended by the Treaty of Prenzlau of 1472, basically confirming the ruling of the Soldin treaty, but settling on a border north of Gartz (Oder) resembling Brandenburg's recent gains. This treaty was accepted by the emperor.
In 1474, Eric II died of the Black death, and his son Bogislaw X inherited Pomerania-Stolp. Bogislaw's brothers had died the same year. After the death of his uncle Wartislaw X in 1478, he became the first sole ruler in the Duchy of Pomerania since almost 200 years.
Eric II had left Pomerania in tense conflicts with Brandenburg and Mecklenburg. Bogislaw managed to resolve these conflicts by both diplomatic and military means. He married his sister, Sophia, to Magnus, Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, and his other sister, Magarete, was married to Magnus' brother Balthasar. Bogislaw himself married Magarete, daughter of Brandenburg's Prince-elector Frederick II. Also, in 1478, Bogislaw regained areas lost to Brandenburg by his father, most notably the town of Gartz and other small towns and castles north of the Brandenburgian Uckermark. During the confirmation of the Peace of Prenzlau in 1479, the border was finally settled north of Strasburg and Bogislaw had to take his possessions as a fief from Brandenburg.
Treaty of Pyzdry in Polish historiography
After World War II, when the area of former Pomerania-Stolp became Polish as part of the so-called "recovered territories", historians in Communist Poland offered different interpretations of the 1390 treaty of Pzydry, which included an oath of vassalage of Wartislaw VII to Jagiello without specifying a territory: Gòrski (1947), Labuda (1948), Bardach (1960), Fenrych (1961) and Czaplinski (1970) said the oath was for all territory held by Wartislaw VII, including Pomerania-Stolp; Mitkowski (1946) and Zientara (1969) said the oath was for the territory Waritislaw received as fiefs from Jagiello (especially Naklo/Nakel); Mielcarz (1976) said the oath was binding only Wartislaw himself, as a person, to Jagiello; and Gumowski (1951) said the document shows Wartislaw giving a general solemn promise of service.
In post-Communist Polish historiography, Kosman (1995) interprets the treaty in a way that Pomerania-Stolp became a Polish fief, while Czacharowski (2001) says it was an alliance and refers to Naklo being held as a Polish fief. With respect to the discourse in Polish historiography, Branig and Buchholz (1997) say that however the treaty is interpreted, it did not have any significance for the future.
Dukes
Main article: List of Pomeranian duchies and dukes- 1368-1373 Bogislaw V
- 1374-1377 Casimir IV (V)
- 1377-1395 Wartislaw VII
- 1395-1402 Bogislaw VIII and Barnim V
- 1402-1403 Barnim V
- 1403-1418 Bogislaw VIII
- 1418-1446 Bogislaw IX
- 1449-1459 Eric I
See also
References
- Kyra Inachim, Die Geschichte Pommerns, Hinstorff Rostock, 2008, p.30, ISBN 978-3-356-01044-2
- ^ Norbert Buske, Pommern, Helms Schwerin 1997, p.21, ISBN 3-931185-07-9
- Gerhard Krause, Siegfried M Schwertner, Horst Balz, Gerhard Müller, Theologische Realenzyklopadie: Studienausgabe Teil II, 2nd edition, Walter de Gruyter, 1999, p.40, ISBN 3110162954
- Benl, Rudolf (1992). "Anfänge und Entwicklung des Ständewesens in Pommern". In Boockmann, Hartmut (ed.). Die Anfänge der ständischen Vertretungen in Preußen und seinen Nachbarländern. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag. p. 132. ISBN 3486558404.
- ^ Hartmut Boockmann, Die Anfänge der ständischen Vertretungen in Preussen und seinen Nachbarländern, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 1992, p.131, ISBN 3486558404
- ^ Hartmut Boockmann, Die Anfänge der ständischen Vertretungen in Preussen und seinen Nachbarländern, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 1992, p.132, ISBN 3486558404
- ^ Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, pp.143,146,147, ISBN 3886802728
- ^ Czacharowski, Antoni (2001). Bürgertum und Rittertum im Spätmittelalter. Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. p. 148. ISBN 8323113041.
- Michael Müller-Wille, ed. (1995). Slawen und Deutsche im südlichen Ostseeraum vom 11. bis zum 16. Jahrhundert. Wachholtz. p. 153. ISBN 3529064521.
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.157, ISBN 3886802728
- Czacharowski, Antoni (2001). Bürgertum und Rittertum im Spätmittelalter. Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. p. 146. ISBN 8323113041.
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.154-158, ISBN 3886802728
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, pp.168,170,173 ISBN 3886802728
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.158, ISBN 3886802728
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.186, ISBN 3886802728
- ^ Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.181, ISBN 3886802728
- ^ Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.183, ISBN 3886802728
- ^ Bogislaw X in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, pp.186,189, ISBN 3886802728
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.189, ISBN 3886802728
- Werner Buchholz, Pommern, Siedler, 1999, p.190, ISBN 3886802728
- ^ Władysław Czapliński, Tadeusz Ładogórski, Atlas historyczny polski, Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych, 1970, p.12
- ^ Branig, Hans (1997). Werner Buchholz (ed.). Geschichte Pommerns, Volume I, Vom Werden des neuzeitlichen Staates bis zum Verlust der staatlichen Selbständigkeit, 1300-1648. Böhlau. pp. 29–30. ISBN 3412071897.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Juliusz Bardach, Historia państwa i prawa Polski, Volume 1, Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe, 1964, p.589
- Marceli Kosman, Na tropach bohaterów Krzyżaków, Książka i Wiedza, 1995, ISBN 830512746X, p.27
- Czacharowski, Antoni (2001). Bürgertum und Rittertum im Spätmittelalter. Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. pp. 146–148. ISBN 8323113041.
- Branig, Hans (1997). Werner Buchholz (ed.). Geschichte Pommerns, Volume I, Vom Werden des neuzeitlichen Staates bis zum Verlust der staatlichen Selbständigkeit, 1300-1648. Böhlau. p. 30. ISBN 3412071897.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
Fiefdoms of Poland | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medieval district principalities |
| ||||||||||||||
Other medieval fiefs | |||||||||||||||
Early modern fiefs of the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland |
|