| Revision as of 15:15, 25 October 2009 editChris Chittleborough (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,016 editsm Reverted edits by ROSHing (talk) to last version by Chris Chittleborough← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:39, 5 December 2009 edit undo150.135.51.22 (talk) →See alsoNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| {{col-end}} | {{col-end}} | ||
Revision as of 02:39, 5 December 2009
Intellectual dishonesty is dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. Examples are:
- the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false or misleading
- the conscious omission of aspects of the truth known or believed to be relevant in the particular context.
Rhetoric is used to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence. If a person is aware of the evidence and agrees with the conclusion it portends, yet advocates a contradictory view, they commit intellectual dishonesty. If the person is unaware of the evidence, their position is ignorance, even if in agreement with the scientific conclusion. If the person is knowingly aware that there may be additional evidence but purposefully fails to check, and then acts as though the position is confirmed, this is also intellectual dishonesty.
The terms intellectually dishonest and intellectual dishonesty are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light.
The phrase is also frequently used by orators when a debate foe or audience reaches a conclusion varying from the speaker's on a given subject. This appears mostly in debates or discussions of speculative, non-scientific issues, such as morality or policy.
See also
In specific fields |
Other
|
Footnotes
- "Intellectual dishonesty (in philosophy)". Enlexica, Inc. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2008-07-16.
References
- Colin McNickle, More intellectual dishonesty on guns, December 15, 2002, The Pittsburg Tribune Review
- Editorial, Intellectual dishonesty, Jerusalem Post, May 20, 2006
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |