Revision as of 21:28, 10 December 2009 editPfold (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,581 edits →Removal of books← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:54, 13 December 2009 edit undoSimplebutpowerful (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,110 edits →Characters listed: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
Should '']'' and '']'' be removed from the template? Technically, these are not actual ] novels; ''When We Were Very Young'' features the first of appearance of the character, and ''Now We Are Six'' features illistrations of the character. Thoughts? -- ] (]) 9:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
Should '']'' and '']'' be removed from the template? Technically, these are not actual ] novels; ''When We Were Very Young'' features the first of appearance of the character, and ''Now We Are Six'' features illistrations of the character. Thoughts? -- ] (]) 9:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
:Well, ''none'' of these books are novels in any normal use of the term. --] (]) 21:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
:Well, ''none'' of these books are novels in any normal use of the term. --] (]) 21:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Characters listed == |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think the alphabetical listing of characters in the template is the best way to organize them. Pooh himself should be first, no? And the others should be listed in rough order of importance after him, something like: Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, Christopher Robin, Rabbit, Eeyore, Kanga, Roo, Gopher, Lottie, Heffalump, Woozle, Lumpy, Kessie, List.]<sub>]</sub>] 16:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC) |
I don't think the alphabetical listing of characters in the template is the best way to organize them. Pooh himself should be first, no? And the others should be listed in rough order of importance after him, something like: Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, Christopher Robin, Rabbit, Eeyore, Kanga, Roo, Gopher, Lottie, Heffalump, Woozle, Lumpy, Kessie, List.Simplebutpowerful 16:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)