Misplaced Pages

Talk:Comparison of feed aggregators: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:36, 18 December 2009 edit201.152.238.134 (talk) →client adding← Previous edit Revision as of 17:39, 18 December 2009 edit undoMiami33139 (talk | contribs)6,175 edits Reverted to revision 329322675 by SineBot; I have remove someones test.. (TW)Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
<s>should we really add bittorrent clients like on this ]?</s> I give a note in the introduction! <s>should we really add bittorrent clients like on this ]?</s> I give a note in the introduction!


''''''Bold text''''''===client adding=== ===client adding===
following clients need to be added: following clients need to be added:
]: ]:

Revision as of 17:39, 18 December 2009

rss

today evening I will add the clients of Comparison of e-mail clients and will expand this tables of os support and so on... mabdul 0=* 15:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

a preview is here

todo-list

bittorrent clinets?

should we really add bittorrent clients like on this page? I give a note in the introduction!

client adding

following clients need to be added: Comparison of web browsers:

again wrong order in the comparison mabdul 0=* 17:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
following clients should be deleted:

  • Windows Mail (the vista version of outlook express) does not support rss feeds
done mabdul 0=* 12:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Features to add to comparison

mabdul 0=* 17:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Other Feed services

  • Feed43 (WatzNew)
  • NewsMonster
  • Syndirella

travb (talk) 10:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

rss2email

Mention rss2email, not just in passing, please. Jidanni (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Downloadable aggregators only?

Is this article only supposed to cover aggregators that can be downloaded? To put it another way, does it specifically exclude web-based ones? I'm not familiar with some of the aggegators listed, but I'm wondering if sites like Bloglines and Google Reader have been left out for a specific reason, or just because no one got to them yet. If they are excluded, the introduction should state which kinds of aggregators are being listed. Ebow (talk) 14:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Link Colors

Why are some items red and some blue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.5.219.236 (talk) 22:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)