Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/QutIM (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:57, 19 December 2009 editCybercobra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers67,649 edits no use by that name; spa tag← Previous edit Revision as of 06:18, 19 December 2009 edit undoMiami33139 (talk | contribs)6,175 edits Hubbitus is an SPA.Next edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
For your convenience, below are the sources added to my talkpage. For your convenience, below are the sources added to my talkpage.


https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/qutim - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/qutim -


Line 64: Line 63:
*'''Keep''' Doing a small walk through all the articles in Misplaced Pages, dedicated to various IMs, I've found that (apart from the one regrading Pidgin) the rest: first don't have (more) RR and second by the look of them are not (more) notable then qutIM's one is, but they are not suggested for deletion. Of course, articles like have their RR and are definitely "notable". Dear ], if people don't find it notable enough why is it translated to other languages? You definitely spit on these people's faces (including me), that are trying to contribute. For me is one of the most <b>reliable</b> sources, when looking for OS software, and for sure highest rated apps are <b>notable</b>. Cheers! ] (]) 12:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Doing a small walk through all the articles in Misplaced Pages, dedicated to various IMs, I've found that (apart from the one regrading Pidgin) the rest: first don't have (more) RR and second by the look of them are not (more) notable then qutIM's one is, but they are not suggested for deletion. Of course, articles like have their RR and are definitely "notable". Dear ], if people don't find it notable enough why is it translated to other languages? You definitely spit on these people's faces (including me), that are trying to contribute. For me is one of the most <b>reliable</b> sources, when looking for OS software, and for sure highest rated apps are <b>notable</b>. Cheers! ] (]) 12:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Besides all, qutIM is rather popular client. When the 0.2 version was released, there were more than 70000 downloads of the program only in the release day. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> *'''Keep''' Besides all, qutIM is rather popular client. When the 0.2 version was released, there were more than 70000 downloads of the program only in the release day. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Keep''' Qutim in our days from day to day will be added in most of Linux and BSD distributions. I really willing see article about it in wikipedia. ] (]) 13:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Qutim in our days from day to day will be added in most of Linux and BSD distributions. I really willing see article about it in wikipedia. ] (]) 13:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC){{spa|Hubbitus}}
*'''Keep''' QutIM - is the most valuable and worthy pretender to be named "Linux Must Have!!!" in IM nomination. Besides that fact, that it is in UNDER CONSTRUCTIUON state it's very perspective soft. By the way, it's cross-platform and multi-protocol!!! MUST HAVE!!! KEEP!!! -Varelka 16:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|93.191.99.79}} *'''Keep''' QutIM - is the most valuable and worthy pretender to be named "Linux Must Have!!!" in IM nomination. Besides that fact, that it is in UNDER CONSTRUCTIUON state it's very perspective soft. By the way, it's cross-platform and multi-protocol!!! MUST HAVE!!! KEEP!!! -Varelka 16:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|93.191.99.79}}
*'''Keep''' qutIM is in official ] (]) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC) *'''Keep''' qutIM is in official ] (]) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:18, 19 December 2009

QutIM

Not a voteIf you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Misplaced Pages contributors. Misplaced Pages has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.
AfDs for this article:
QutIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • )
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the third nomination of this article. The first result was delete as non-notable. The second I speedy deleted as a recreation of an article previously deleted at AfD. However, on my talk page, editors provided a range of additional sources. Some of these certainly do not meet RS criteria. Some are in Russian, so I can't tell. One is to HAKER, which may well be a reliable source. However, I'm not qualified to tell. I have now restored this and brought to AfD so that more eyes can see it, and hopefully reach a final community decision.

Apologies in advance for the length of this nomination! I have no particularly strong feelings either way, this is a procedural nomination really.

For your convenience, below are the sources added to my talkpage.

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/qutim -

And some more links: http://qutim-forum.de/forum/ http://www.qutim.cz/ Nokia has done port qutIM to Symbian: http://www.forum.nokia.com/info/sw.nokia.com/id/d0134921-0894-42a3-a1a8-f3d0fdb7a9b3/Qt_for_Symbian_qutIM_Example.html

http://qt-apps.org/index.php?xsortmode=high -

nokia.com qt-apps.org are famous secondary sources, Also some more secondary sources, but now mostly on russian: http://valentine.viviti.com/ http://habrahabr.ru/ http://mac.softpedia.com/ http://mib.pianetalinux.org/ http://itshaman.ru/ http://www.opennet.ru/ http://iblog.su/ http://hakushka.wordpress.com/ http://jenyay.net/ http://t-34.name/ http://megaobzor.com/

Also information about qutIM was published in some famous magazines like }{aker (April, August), ITFormat

XAKER is a journal with more than ten year history,

ITFormat looks to be journal with both professional and user articles.

English language: Qt-Apps (btw it's a software portal rather than forum) Freshports - FreeBSD software ports Gentoo Packages Softpedia - Software encyclopedia, Mac section Archlinux software Maemo software Macupdate - Mac software Software informer Slax packages Mops Linux packages

GedUK  21:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

There's absolutely no need for personal abuse. If you continue, you will be blocked. Comment on the content, not the editor. GedUK  15:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Doing a small walk through all the articles in Misplaced Pages, dedicated to various IMs, I've found that (apart from the one regrading Pidgin) the rest: first don't have (more) RR and second by the look of them are not (more) notable then qutIM's one is, but they are not suggested for deletion. Of course, articles like Bukkake have their RR and are definitely "notable". Dear Miami33139, if people don't find it notable enough why is it translated to other languages? You definitely spit on these people's faces (including me), that are trying to contribute. For me QT-Apps is one of the most reliable sources, when looking for OS software, and for sure highest rated apps are notable. Cheers! Boyan.kiroff (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Besides all, qutIM is rather popular client. When the 0.2 version was released, there were more than 70000 downloads of the program only in the release day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.218.186.254 (talk) 13:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Qutim in our days from day to day will be added in most of Linux and BSD distributions. I really willing see article about it in wikipedia. Hubbitus (talk) 13:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
  • Keep QutIM - is the most valuable and worthy pretender to be named "Linux Must Have!!!" in IM nomination. Besides that fact, that it is in UNDER CONSTRUCTIUON state it's very perspective soft. By the way, it's cross-platform and multi-protocol!!! MUST HAVE!!! KEEP!!! -Varelka 16:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.191.99.79 (talk) This template must be substituted.
  • Keep qutIM is in official xmpp clients list 94.50.32.235 (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment added {{not a vote}}, because some of the WP:SPAs are voting because they like it, and may be canvassed offsite. Remember to cite policy when !voting. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 02:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Categories: