| Revision as of 17:41, 23 December 2009 editBlueboar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers53,082 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:12, 23 December 2009 edit undoJBsupreme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers30,453 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - the fact that a marketing company has notable clients does not establish its own notability (notability is not inherited) ... it would be different if they had won an award for that representation (or something similar). The conflict of interest is a serious issue. ] (]) 17:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - the fact that a marketing company has notable clients does not establish its own notability (notability is not inherited) ... it would be different if they had won an award for that representation (or something similar). The conflict of interest is a serious issue. ] (]) 17:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' not notable. ] (]) 17:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' not notable. ] (]) 17:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Clever, very clever. I almost thought there was something there when I saw the WSJ reference, until I realized it was just a press release that they were republishing. Everything else is garbage. ] (]) 23:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:12, 23 December 2009
Adrenalina NYC
- Adrenalina NYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is an advert written solely by an employee of the company. marginal if any notability. would suggest if/when topic is notable that it is created by a un-biased party, not an employee β 07:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, a multicultural marketing and advertising agency. A publicity business using Misplaced Pages for publicity. References to brandweek.com and similar sites are not enough to show general notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - the fact that a marketing company has notable clients does not establish its own notability (notability is not inherited) ... it would be different if they had won an award for that representation (or something similar). The conflict of interest is a serious issue. Blueboar (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. Doc Quintana (talk) 17:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Clever, very clever. I almost thought there was something there when I saw the WSJ reference, until I realized it was just a press release that they were republishing. Everything else is garbage. JBsupreme (talk) 23:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)