Misplaced Pages

Gulf War syndrome: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:00, 29 December 2009 edit99.27.201.92 (talk) Diagnosis: replace template here← Previous edit Revision as of 04:38, 29 December 2009 edit undoWVBluefield (talk | contribs)750 edits see talkNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{POV|date=December 2009}}

{{Infobox Disease {{Infobox Disease
|Name = Gulf War illness |Name = Gulf War illness
|Image = Pyridostigmine.svg |Image = Pyridostigmine.svg
|Caption = pyridostigmine, a nerve agent antidote <br /> and one of the implicated toxins |Caption = nerve agent antidote pyridostigmine, <br /> an implicated toxin
|ICD9 = {{ICD9|V65.5}} (inconclusive) <br /> also nonstandard "DX111" |ICD9 = {{ICD9|V65.5}} (inconclusive) <br /> also nonstandard "DX111"
|MeshID = D018923 |MeshID = D018923
}} }}


'''Gulf War syndrome''' (GWS) or '''Gulf War illness''' (GWI) affects ] and civilians who were near conflicts during, or downwind of a ] depot demolition after, the 1991 ].<ref>Iversen A, Chalder T, Wessely S. "Gulf War Illness: lessons from medically unexplained symptoms." Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;27(7):842-54.</ref><ref>Gronseth GS. "Gulf war syndrome: a toxic exposure? A systematic review." Neurol Clin. 2005 May;23(2):523-40.</ref> A wide range of acute and chronic symptoms have included ], loss of muscle control, ]s, dizziness and loss of balance, memory problems, muscle and ], ], skin problems, ] problems, and ].<ref>University of Virginia. </ref> Roughly one in four of the 697,000 veterans who served in the first Gulf War are afflicted with the controversial disorder, a real condition with real causes and serious consequences.<ref name=FedReport></ref> '''Gulf War syndrome''' (GWS) or '''Gulf War illness''' (GWI) describes a range of ] reported by combat ] of the 1991 ] typified by a range of ].<ref>Iversen A, Chalder T, Wessely S. "Gulf War Illness: lessons from medically unexplained symptoms." Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;27(7):842-54.</ref><ref>Gronseth GS. "Gulf war syndrome: a toxic exposure? A systematic review." Neurol Clin. 2005 May;23(2):523-40.</ref> Symptoms attributed to this syndrome have been wide-ranging and include acute and chronic ailments. These include ], loss of muscle control, ]s, dizziness and loss of balance, memory problems, muscle and ], ], skin problems.<ref>University of Virginia. </ref>
Since the end of the Gulf War, the ] (VA) and the ] have conducted numerous studies on Gulf War Veterans. The latest studies have determined that while the physical health of deployed veterans is similar to that of non-deployed veterans, there is an increase in 4 out of the 12 medical conditions reportedly associated with Gulf War syndrome <ref>Annals of Internal Medicine. Gulf War Veterans' Health: Medical Evaluation of a U.S. Cohort. June 7, 2005</ref> While the exact source of veteran health complaints remains unknown, several possible causes have been investigated including ], ], exposure to ], ], ], and ].<ref name=FedReport/>
Exposure to toxic chemicals is the cause of the illness. Several specific causes have been investigated, including ] nerve gas antidote, ] pesticides, chemical weapons, and ]. Causes which have been ruled out include ], ] ],<ref name=FedReport/> and ]. Antidote pills given to protect troops from ] and insect repellents used during deployment were most closely linked. Exposure to the destruction of the ], where large quantities of the chemical weapon ] was stored, is negatively correlated with motor speed.<ref name=Toomey>Toomey ''et al'' (2009) "Neuropsychological functioning of U.S. Gulf War veterans 10 years after the war" ''J Int Neuropsychol Soc'' PMID 19640317</ref> Epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to depleted uranium.<ref name="Hindin">Hindin, R. ''et al.'' (2005) ''Environmental Health,'' vol. 4, pp. 17. </ref>


In the United States in 2008, the federally mandated Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses released a 452-page report indicating that roughly 1 in 4 of the 697,000 veterans who served in the first Gulf War are afflicted with the disorder. The report stated that "scientific evidence leaves no question that Gulf War illness is a real condition with real causes and serious consequences for affected veterans." ,<ref name=FedReport></ref> The report concluded that use of ] pills, given to protect
While the treatment of sarin exposure has been studied,<ref name=Schecter>Schecter, WP (2004) "Cholinergic symptoms due to nerve agent attack: a strategy for management." ''Anesthesiol Clin North America'' '''22'''(3):579-90. PMID 15325720</ref> other ]s such as pyridostigmine bromide and organophosphate insect repellents may or may not involve similar management. ] can be decontaminated from steel surfaces<ref name=Francis>Francis, A.J. (2005) "Decontamination of uranium-contaminated steel surfaces by hydroxycarboxylic acid with uranium recovery." ''Environ Sci Technol'' '''39'''(13):5015-21. PMID 16053105</ref> and aquifers.<ref name=Wu>Wu, W.M. ''et al'' (2006) "Pilot-scale in situ bioremedation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 2. Reduction of u(VI) and geochemical control of u(VI) bioavailability." ''Environ Sci Technol'' '''40'''(12):3986-95. PMID 16830572</ref> Diplomatic reconciliation is a means of prevention.<ref name=Curle>Curle, A. (1997) "Public mental health. III: Hatred and reconciliation." ''Med Confl Surviv'' '''13'''(1):37-47. PMID 9080785</ref><ref name=Jentleson>Jentleson, B.W. (1996) UC Berkeley Policy Paper 27, ''Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation''</ref>
troops from effects of nerve agents, and pesticide use during deployment were the two conditions most closely linked to illness<ref name=FedReport/> . Researchers have also recently narrowed impaired neuropsychological function to individuals exposed to the destruction of the ] where large quantities of the neurotoxin ] was stored.<ref> Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. ''Neuropsychological functioning of U.S. Gulf War veterans 10 years after the war''.</ref>


==Classification== ==Classification==
Line 19: Line 18:


==Signs and symptoms== ==Signs and symptoms==

] offensive ground campaign, February 24-28, 1991, by nationality (click for detail).]]


About one-fourth of the 697,000 U.S. servicemen and women in the first Gulf War have shown symptoms related to Gulf War Syndrome. About one-fourth of the 697,000 U.S. servicemen and women in the first Gulf War have shown symptoms related to Gulf War Syndrome.


U.S. and UK, with the highest rates of excess illness, are distinguished from the other nations by higher rates of ] use, use of ] ], and somewhat higher rates of exposures to oil fire ] and reported chemical alerts. France, with possibly the lowest illness rates, had lower rates of pesticide use, and no use of anthrax vaccine.<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 78)</ref> French troops also served to the North and West of all other combat troops, away and upwind of major combat engagements<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 68)</ref> . U.S. and UK, with the highest rates of excess illness, are distinguished from the other nations by higher rates of ] use, use of ] ], and somewhat higher rates of exposures to oil fire ] and reported chemical alerts. France, with possibly the lowest illness rates, had lower rates of pesticide use, and no use of anthrax vaccine.<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 78)</ref> French troops also served to the North and West of all other combat troops, away and upwind of major combat engagements<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 68)</ref> .

A 2001 study of 15,000 February 1991 U.S. ] combat veterans and 15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8 (fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with birth defects.<ref>{{cite journal
| author = Kang, H., ''et al.'
| year = 2001
| url = http://www.annalsofepidemiology.org/article/PIIS1047279701002459/abstract
| title = Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Gulf War Veterans: A Population-Based Survey of 30,000 Veterans
| journal = ''Annals of Epidemiology''
| volume = 11
| issue = 7
| pages = 504–511
| pmid = 11557183 | doi = 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00245-9
}}</ref> After examination of children's medical records two years later, the birth defect rate increased by more than 20%:

<blockquote>"Dr. Kang found that male Gulf War veterans reported having infants with likely birth defects at twice the rate of non-veterans. Furthermore, female Gulf War veterans were almost three times more likely to report children with birth defects than their non-Gulf counterparts. The numbers changed somewhat with medical records verification. However, Dr. Kang and his colleagues concluded that the risk of birth defects in children of deployed male veterans still was about 2.2 times that of non-deployed veterans."<ref>Department of Veterans Affairs (2003) ''Gulf War Review'' '''12'''(1), p. 10.</ref></blockquote>

In a study of U.K. troops, "Overall, the risk of any malformation among pregnancies reported by men was 50% higher in Gulf War Veterans (GWV) compared with Non-GWVs."<ref>Doyle, P., ''et al.'' (2004) ''International Journal of Epidemiology,'' '''33'''(1), pp. 74-86; PMID 15075150.</ref>


{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:97%; text-align:right;" {|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:97%; text-align:right;"
Line 66: Line 47:
|align="left"|Terminal tumors||33%|| ||9%||11% |align="left"|Terminal tumors||33%|| ||9%||11%
|} |}

. This version from data by same author(s) in Wilcock, A.R., ed. (2004) "Uranium in the Wind" (Ontario: Pandora Press) ISBN 097361532X</ref>]]
{|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:97%; text-align:right;" {|class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:97%; text-align:right;"
|+Excess prevalence of recognized medical conditions<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 71)</ref> |+Excess prevalence of recognized medical conditions<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 71)</ref>
Line 97: Line 78:
|} |}


A 2001 study of 15,000 February 1991 U.S. ] combat veterans and 15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8 (fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with birth defects.<ref>{{cite journal
Although Gulf War illness is the most prominent condition affecting Gulf War veterans, it is just one health issue to be addressed in the larger context of the health of Gulf War veterans. Other Gulf War-related health issues of importance include rates of diagnosable medical conditions and post-war mortality among Gulf War veterans, and questions related to the risk of birth defects and other health problems in veterans’ family members.
| author = Kang, H., ''et al.'

| year = 2001
The three studies most representative of Gulf War era veterans in the U.S. and U.K. have all indicated significant excess rates of birth defects in children of Gulf War veterans. News articles have reported that rates of cancer and birth defects in Iraq increased dramatically during the 1990s, specifically in regions where the greatest quantity of ] was used in the Gulf War. Conference reports describing an increased incidence of congenital anomalies in Basrah and increased numbers of cancer cases, both in Iraqi military personnel who served in the war and in four Iraqi hospitals, lend some support to these contentions.<ref name="FedReport" />
| url = http://www.annalsofepidemiology.org/article/PIIS1047279701002459/abstract

| title = Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Gulf War Veterans: A Population-Based Survey of 30,000 Veterans
Results from two studies, using different methods in different groups of symptomatic veterans, indicate that Gulf War illness is associated with a low-level, persistent immune activation, reflected in elevated levels of the cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-10. In addition, several studies have reported that NK cell numbers and/or cytotoxic activity are significantly reduced in veterans with Gulf War illness.<ref name="ReferenceA">Page 262 (PDF page 270) of the November, 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report</ref>
| journal = ''Annals of Epidemiology''
| volume = 11
| issue = 7
| pages = 504–511
| pmid = 11557183 | doi = 10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00245-9
}}</ref>


==Causes== ==Causes==
Line 118: Line 105:
===Organophosphate pesticides=== ===Organophosphate pesticides===
The use of ] ] and ] during the first Gulf War is credited with keeping rates of pest-borne diseases low. Pesticide use is one of only two exposures consistently identified by Gulf War epidemiologic studies to be significantly associated with Gulf War illness.<ref>U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Special Assistant to the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) for Gulf War Illnesses Medical Readiness and Military Deployments. Environmental Exposure Report: Pesticides Final Report. Washington, D.C. April 17, 2003.</ref> Multisymptom illness profiles similar to Gulf War illness have been associated with low-level pesticide exposures in other human populations. In addition, Gulf War studies have identified dose-response effects, indicating that greater pesticide use is more strongly associated with Gulf War illness than more limited use.<ref>Krengel M, Sullivan K. Neuropsychological Functioning in Gulf War Veterans Exposed to Pesticides and Pyridostigmine Bromide. Fort Detrick, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; August, 2008. W81XWH-04-1-0118</ref> Pesticide use during the Gulf War has also been associated with ] deficits and ] alterations in Gulf War veterans in clinical studies conducted follownf the end of the war. The 2008 report concluded that “all available sources of evidence combine to support a consistent and compelling case that pesticide use during the Gulf War is causally associated with Gulf War illness.”<ref name=FedReport/> The use of ] ] and ] during the first Gulf War is credited with keeping rates of pest-borne diseases low. Pesticide use is one of only two exposures consistently identified by Gulf War epidemiologic studies to be significantly associated with Gulf War illness.<ref>U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Special Assistant to the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) for Gulf War Illnesses Medical Readiness and Military Deployments. Environmental Exposure Report: Pesticides Final Report. Washington, D.C. April 17, 2003.</ref> Multisymptom illness profiles similar to Gulf War illness have been associated with low-level pesticide exposures in other human populations. In addition, Gulf War studies have identified dose-response effects, indicating that greater pesticide use is more strongly associated with Gulf War illness than more limited use.<ref>Krengel M, Sullivan K. Neuropsychological Functioning in Gulf War Veterans Exposed to Pesticides and Pyridostigmine Bromide. Fort Detrick, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; August, 2008. W81XWH-04-1-0118</ref> Pesticide use during the Gulf War has also been associated with ] deficits and ] alterations in Gulf War veterans in clinical studies conducted follownf the end of the war. The 2008 report concluded that “all available sources of evidence combine to support a consistent and compelling case that pesticide use during the Gulf War is causally associated with Gulf War illness.”<ref name=FedReport/>

]


===Sarin nerve agent=== ===Sarin nerve agent===


Many of the symptoms of Gulf War syndrome are similar to the symptoms of ], ], and ] poisoning.<ref name=Friis>{{cite book |title=Epidemiology for Public Health Practice |last=Friis |first=Robert H. |coauthors=Thomas A. Sellers |year=2004 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=0763731706 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=A Review of the Scientific Literature as it Pertains to Gulf War Illnesses |last=Spektor |first=Dalia M. |coauthors=Richard A. Rettig, Lee H. Hilborne, Beatrice Alexandra Golomb, Grant N. Marshall, L. M. Davis, Cathy Donald Sherbourne, Naomi H. Harley, William S. Augerson, Gary Cecchine, United States Dept. of Defense |year=1998 |publisher=Rand Corporation |isbn=0833026801 }}</ref> Gulf War veterans were exposed to a number of sources of these compounds, including ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=847&id=1311632004 |title=Campaigners hail 'nerve gas link' to Gulf War Syndrome - Scotsman.com News |publisher=News.scotsman.com |date= |accessdate=2009-11-24}}</ref> Many of the symptoms of Gulf War syndrome are similar to the symptoms of ], ], and ] poisoning.<ref name=Friis>{{cite book |title=Epidemiology for Public Health Practice |last=Friis |first=Robert H. |coauthors=Thomas A. Sellers |year=2004 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=0763731706 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=A Review of the Scientific Literature as it Pertains to Gulf War Illnesses |last=Spektor |first=Dalia M. |coauthors=Richard A. Rettig, Lee H. Hilborne, Beatrice Alexandra Golomb, Grant N. Marshall, L. M. Davis, Cathy Donald Sherbourne, Naomi H. Harley, William S. Augerson, Gary Cecchine, United States Dept. of Defense |year=1998 |publisher=Rand Corporation |isbn=0833026801 }}</ref> Gulf War veterans were exposed to a number of sources of these compounds, including ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=847&id=1311632004 |title=Campaigners hail 'nerve gas link' to Gulf War Syndrome - Scotsman.com News |publisher=News.scotsman.com |date= |accessdate=2009-11-24}}</ref>
]

Chemical detection units from the Czech Republic, France, and Britain confirmed chemical agents. French detection units detected chemical agents. Both Czech and French forces reported detections immediately to U.S. forces. U.S. forces detected, confirmed, and reported chemical agents; and U.S. soldiers were awarded medals for detecting chemical agents. The ] said that chemical alarms went off 18,000 times during the Gulf War. After the air war started on January 16, 1991, coalition forces were chronically exposed to low but nonlethal levels of chemical and biological agents released primarily by direct Iraqi attack via ]s, ]s, ], or aircraft ] and by ] from allied bombings of Iraqi chemical warfare munitions facilities.<ref> </ref> Chemical detection units from the Czech Republic, France, and Britain confirmed chemical agents. French detection units detected chemical agents. Both Czech and French forces reported detections immediately to U.S. forces. U.S. forces detected, confirmed, and reported chemical agents; and U.S. soldiers were awarded medals for detecting chemical agents. The ] said that chemical alarms went off 18,000 times during the Gulf War. After the air war started on January 16, 1991, coalition forces were chronically exposed to low but nonlethal levels of chemical and biological agents released primarily by direct Iraqi attack via ]s, ]s, ], or aircraft ] and by ] from allied bombings of Iraqi chemical warfare munitions facilities.<ref> </ref>


Line 134: Line 119:
===Depleted uranium=== ===Depleted uranium===


] ]


] (DU) was widely used in tank ] and ] ] for the first time in the ]. DU is a dense, weakly radioactive metal. Munitions made from it often burn when they impact a hard target, producing toxic ] products. Roughly 320 tons of DU were used during the February, 1991 conflict.<ref name="autogenerated6">Global Security. ````</ref> After military personnel began reporting unexplained health problems in the aftermath of the Gulf War, questions were raised about the health effect of exposure to depleted uranium. ] (DU) was widely used in tank ] and ] ] for the first time in the ]. DU is a dense, weakly radioactive metal with physical properties that make it particularly useful in weapons. Munitions often burn when they impact a hard target, producing toxic ] products. Roughly 320 tons of DU were used during the conflict.<ref name="autogenerated6">Global Security. ````</ref> After military personnel began reporting unexplained health problems in the aftermath of the Gulf War, questions were raised about the health effect of exposure to depleted uranium.


] commissioned a two year study on the health effects of depleted uranium exposure during the Gulf War. The study found no epidemiological evidence for increase in birth defects and that claims of adverse chronic health risks from DU exposure were not supported follow up studies on veterans.<ref>Al Marshal, Sandia National Laboratory. , Albert C. Marshall, Sandia National Laboratories</ref> A ] study concluded that the evidence does not
The use of DU in ] is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects.<ref name=MillerMcClain>{{cite journal
suggest long-term excess morbidity or mortality for DU exposure found in veterans.<ref> Harley NH, Foulkes EC, Hilborne LH, Hudson A, Anthony CR. A Review of the Scientific Literature As It
| author = Miller AC, McClain D.
Pertains to Gulf War Illnessess: Depleted Uranium. Vol 7. Arlington, VA: National Defense Research
| title = A review of depleted uranium biological effects: in vitro and in vivo studies
Institute (RAND); 1999</ref>
| journal = ''Rev Environ Health''
| year = 2007 Jan-Mar
| volume = 22
| issue = 1
| pages = 75–89
| pmid = 17508699}}</ref> Normal functioning of the ], ], ], ], and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive, uranium is a ].<ref name=Craft04>{{cite journal
| title = Depleted and natural uranium: chemistry and toxicological effects
| author = E. S. Craft, A. W. Abu-Qare, M. M. Flaherty, M. C. Garofolo, H. L. Rincavage, M. B. Abou-Donia
| journal = ''Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews''
| year = 2004
| volume = 7
| issue = 4
| pages = 297–317
| doi = 10.1080/10937400490452714}}</ref> Because ] is a heavy metal and chemical toxicant with nephrotoxic (kidney-damaging),<ref></ref> ] (birth defect-causing),<ref>{{cite journal |author=Hindin R, Brugge D, Panikkar B |title=Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: a review from an epidemiological perspective |journal=''Environ Health'' |volume=4 |issue= |page=17 |year= 2005|pmid=16124873 |doi=10.1186/1476-069X-4-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Arfsten D, Still K, Ritchie G |title=A review of the effects of uranium and depleted uranium exposure on reproduction and fetal development |journal=Toxicol Ind Health |volume=17 |issue=5-10 |pages=180–91 |year=2001 |pmid=12539863 | doi = 10.1191/0748233701th111oa}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite journal
| author = Wan B, Fleming J, Schultz T, Sayler G
| title = In vitro immune toxicity of depleted uranium: effects on murine macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and gene expression profiles
| journal = Environ Health Perspect
| volume = 114
| issue = 1
| pages = 85–91
| year = 2006
| pmid = 16393663}}</ref> and potentially ]ic<ref>{{Dead link|date=April 2008}}</ref> properties, uranium exposure is associated with a variety of illnesses.<ref></ref> The chemical toxicological hazard posed by uranium dwarfs its radiological hazard because it is only weakly radioactive, and depleted uranium even less so. DU has recently been recognized as a ].<ref name="autogenerated3">{{cite journal |author=Jiang G, Aschner M |title=Neurotoxicity of depleted uranium: reasons for increased concern |journal=''Biol Trace Elem Res'' |volume=110 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 |year=2006 |pmid=16679544 | doi = 10.1385/BTER:110:1:1}}</ref> In 2005, depleted uranium was shown to be a neurotoxin in rats.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Anandan N, Shetty S, Patil K, Ibrahim A |title=Acute urinary retention caused by anterior urethral polyp |journal=''Br J Urol'' |volume=69 |issue=3 |pages=321–2 |year=1992 |pmid=1568112 |doi=10.1111/j.1464-410X.1992.tb15541.x}}</ref> Epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to DU.<ref name="Hindin" />


The 2008 Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses similarly concluded that while there were unanswered questions about the long term effects of DU exposure, it was not likely a primary cause of Gulf War Syndrome.<ref name=FedReport/>
Early studies of depleted uranium ] exposure assumed that uranium combustion product particles would quickly settle out of the air<ref>{{Dead link|date=November 2009}}</ref> and thus could not affect populations more than a few kilometers from target areas,<ref>{{cite journal |author=Mitsakou C, Eleftheriadis K, Housiadas C, Lazaridis M |title=Modeling of the dispersion of depleted uranium aerosol |journal=Health Phys |volume=84 |issue=4 |pages=538–44 |year=2003 |pmid=12705453 |doi=10.1097/00004032-200304000-00014}}</ref> and that such particles, if inhaled, would remain undissolved in the lung for a great length of time and thus could be detected in urine.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Horan P, Dietz L, Durakovic A |title=The quantitative analysis of depleted uranium isotopes in British, Canadian, and U.S. Gulf War veterans |journal=Mil Med |volume=167 |issue=8 |pages=620–7 |year=2002 |pmid=12188230}}</ref> ] ion contamination has been found on and around depleted uranium targets.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Salbu B, Janssens K, Lind O, Proost K, Gijsels L, Danesi P |title=Oxidation states of uranium in depleted uranium particles from Kuwait |journal=J Environ Radioact |volume=78 |issue=2 |pages=125–35 |year=2005 |pmid=15511555 |doi=10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.04.001}}</ref>


In 2001, a study was published in Military Medicine that found DU in the urine of Gulf War veterans.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Hodge S, Ejnik J, Squibb K, McDiarmid M, Morris E, Landauer M, McClain D |title=Detection of depleted uranium in biological samples from Gulf War veterans |journal=Mil Med |volume=166 |issue=12 Suppl |pages=69–70 |year=2001 |pmid=11778443}}</ref> Another study, published by ] in 2004, also showed DU in the urine of Gulf War veterans.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Gwiazda R, Squibb K, McDiarmid M, Smith D |title=Detection of depleted uranium in urine of veterans from the 1991 Gulf War |journal=Health Phys |volume=86 |issue=1 |pages=12–8 |year=2004 |pmid=14695004 |doi=10.1097/00004032-200401000-00004}}</ref> A study of UK veterans who thought they might have been exposed to DU showed aberrations in their ] ]s.<ref name="Schröder2003">{{cite pmid|12678382}}</ref> Mice immune cells exposed to uranium exhibit abnormalities.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Wan B, Fleming J, Schultz T, Sayler G |title=In vitro immune toxicity of depleted uranium: effects on murine macrophages, CD4+ T cells, and gene expression profiles |journal=Environ Health Perspect |volume=114 |issue=1 |pages=85–91 |year=2006 |pmid=16393663}}</ref>

In the ] war zone where depleted uranium was also used, an absence of problems is seen by some as evidence of DU munitions' safety. "Independent investigations by the World Health Organization, European Commission, European Parliament, United Nations Environment Programme, United Kingdom Royal Society, and the Health Council of the Netherlands all discounted any association between depleted uranium and leukemia or other medical problems."<ref name="autogenerated6" /> In Italy, controversy over the health risks associated with the use of DU continues, with a Senate investigation committee was due to release its report into 'Balkan Syndrome' by the end of 2007.<ref>{{cite web |author=Anes Alic|url=http://www.isn.ethz.ch/news/sw/details.cfm?id=18290|title=Depleted uranium, depleted health concerns|publisher=ISN Security Watch|date=October 29, 2007}}</ref> Since then, there has been a resurgence of interest in the health effects of depleted uranium, especially since it has recently been linked with neurotoxicity.<ref name="autogenerated3" />

The aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites or can be inhaled by civilians and military personnel.<ref name="ncbi.nlm.nih.gov">Mitsakou C, Eleftheriadis K, Housiadas C, Lazaridis M 2003 Apr, Retrieved January 15, 2009</ref> During a three week period of conflict in 2003 ], 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used, mostly in cities.<ref name="gaurdian2003">Paul Brown, ''guardian.co.uk'' 25 April 2003, Retrieved February 3, 2009</ref> Depleted uranium may have been standard ordnance in the arsenals of both sides during the ].

]

===Ruled out===

Several potential causes beyond vaccinations, stress, and oil well fires—explained in more detail below—have been ruled out. Other ruled-out potential causes include ] missile fuel and infectious diseases. Limited evidence from several sources suggests that an association with the combined effects of multiple neurotoxicant exposures and receipt of multiple vaccines can not be ruled out.<ref>Veterans Administration (November, 2009) p. 11 (PDF page 21)</ref>


====Anthrax vaccine==== ====Anthrax vaccine====
Line 191: Line 144:


During the war, many ] by the retreating Iraqi army, and the smoke from those fires was inhaled by large numbers of soldiers, many of whom suffered acute ] and other chronic effects, including ] and ]. However, firefighters who were assigned to the oil well fires and encountered the smoke, but who did not take part in combat, have not had GWI symptoms.<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (pages 148, 154, 156)</ref> During the war, many ] by the retreating Iraqi army, and the smoke from those fires was inhaled by large numbers of soldiers, many of whom suffered acute ] and other chronic effects, including ] and ]. However, firefighters who were assigned to the oil well fires and encountered the smoke, but who did not take part in combat, have not had GWI symptoms.<ref> December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (pages 148, 154, 156)</ref>

==Diagnosis==

Multisymptom illness is more prevalent in Gulf War I veterans than veterans of previous conflicts, but the pattern of comorbidities is similar for actively deployed and nondeployed military personnel.<ref>Kelsall ''et al'' (2009) "Physical, psychological, and functional comorbidities of multisymptom illness in Australian male veterans of the 1991 Gulf War," ''Am J Epidemiol'' '''170'''(8):1048-56. PMID 19762370</ref> Management of potentially comorbid toxic exposures requires awareness of the toxins involved.<ref name=Schecter /> Exposure to the destruction of the ], where large quantities of the chemical weapon ] was stored, is negatively correlated with motor speed.<ref name=Toomey /> Epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to depleted uranium<ref name="Hindin" /> and uranium exposure has also been associated with increased cancer rates.<ref name="ajph.org"></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref><ref> </ref><ref> </ref><ref></ref>

{{expand-section}}


==Management== ==Management==


Diplomatic reconciliation is one means of prevention,<ref name=Curle /><ref name=Jentleson /> beyond battlefield air quality management, which often conflicts with established tactical policy. For example, most organized armies practice "secure and hold" tactics which require occupation of areas before they can be decontaminated. Diplomatic reconciliation is one means of prevention,<ref name=Curle>Curle, A. (1997) "Public mental health. III: Hatred and reconciliation." ''Med Confl Surviv'' '''13'''(1):37-47. PMID 9080785</ref><ref name=Jentleson>Jentleson, B.W. (1996) UC Berkeley Policy Paper 27, ''Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation''</ref><ref name=Jentleson /> beyond battlefield air quality management, which often conflicts with established tactical policy. For example, most organized armies practice "secure and hold" tactics which require occupation of areas before they can be decontaminated.

===Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors===
====Nerve agent antidote and insect repellent====


In 2008, a paper published in the '']'' suggested that excess illnesses in Gulf War veterans could be explained in part by their exposure to ] and ] ]s.<ref name=Golomb>Golomb, B. (2008) ''Proc Natl Acad Sci''; ; </ref> A federal report released in November, 2008, agreed, stating that exposure to two substances "are causally associated with Gulf War illness":<ref></ref> In 2008, a paper published in the '']'' suggested that excess illnesses in Gulf War veterans could be explained in part by their exposure to ] and ] ]s.<ref name=Golomb>Golomb, B. (2008) ''Proc Natl Acad Sci''; ; </ref> A federal report released in November, 2008, agreed, stating that exposure to two substances "are causally associated with Gulf War illness":<ref></ref>
Line 210: Line 154:


{{Expand section|date=December 2009}} {{Expand section|date=December 2009}}

====Sarin====

Exposure to ], a ], is a possible comorbidity. Chemical weapons classified as nerve agents are also strong ]. A 2004 review discusses symptoms, signs, and treatment of nerve agent exposure.<ref name=Schecter />

===Uranium exposure===

] ]s such as ] should be treated with ]<ref>{{cite journal|pmid=18313802|year=2008|last1=Sawicki|first1=M|last2=Lecerclé|first2=D|last3=Grillon|first3=G|last4=Le Gall|first4=B|last5=Sérandour|first5=AL|last6=Poncy|first6=JL|last7=Bailly|first7=T|last8=Burgada|first8=R|last9=Lecouvey|first9=M|title=Bisphosphonate sequestering agents. Synthesis and preliminary evaluation for in vitro and in vivo uranium(VI) chelation.|volume=43|issue=12|pages=2768–77|doi=10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.01.018|journal=European journal of medicinal chemistry}}</ref> or other means shortly after exposure.<ref>Spagnul, A ''et al'' (2009) "Calixarene-entrapped nanoemulsion for uranium extraction from contaminated solutions." ''J Pharm Sci'' PMID 19780139</ref> Incorporated uranium becomes ] ions, which accumulate in bone, liver, kidney, and reproductive tissues. Uranium can be decontaminated from steel surfaces<ref name=Francis /> and aquifers.<ref name=Wu />


==Epidemiology== ==Epidemiology==
Epidemiologic studies have been performed evaluating many suspected factors for Gulf War illness as seen in veteran populations. Below is a summary of epidemiologic studies of veterans displaying multisymptom illness and their exposure to suspect conditions from the 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report.<ref> (page 220-221)</ref> Epidemiologic studies have been performed evaluating many suspected factors for Gulf War illness as seen in veteran populations. Below is a summary of epidemiologic studies of veterans displaying multisymptom illness and their exposure to suspect conditions from the 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report.<ref> (page 220-221)</ref>

A fuller understanding of immune function in ill Gulf War veterans is needed, particularly in veteran subgroups with different clinical characteristics and exposure histories. It is also important to determine the extent to which identified immune perturbations may be associated with altered neurological and endocrine processes that are associated with immune regulation.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> No studies that have evaluated birth outcomes and birth defects among Gulf War veterans and their children have assessed whether there is any connection between reproductive outcomes and uranium exposure in the Gulf War.<ref>Page 96 (PDF page 105) of the November, 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report</ref> Very limited cancer data have been reported for U.S. Gulf War veterans in general, and no published research on cases occurring after 1999. Because of the extended latency periods associated with most cancers, it is important that cancer information be brought up to date and that cancer rates be assessed in Gulf War veterans on an ongoing basis. In addition, cancer rates should be evaluated in relation to identifiable exposure and location subgroups.<ref>Page 45 (PDF page 55) of the November, 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report</ref>


{| class="wikitable" <!-- this table has not been peer reviewed --> {| class="wikitable" <!-- this table has not been peer reviewed -->
Line 342: Line 276:
; Research ; Research
* , publishers of the 2008 '''' (7.4 MB PDF) * , publishers of the 2008 '''' (7.4 MB PDF)
* , founded in 1997 by Dr. Asaf Durakovic, M.D., formerly Chief of Professional Clinical Services in the U.S. Army's 531st Medical Detachment during the Desert Shield phase of the 1991 Gulf War and former Veteran's Administration official


; Associations ; Associations
Line 348: Line 281:
* *
* *

; Video
* ''Conspiracy Test: Gulf War Illness'' investigative report by the ] - , , , ,


{{DEFAULTSORT:Gulf War Syndrome}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Gulf War Syndrome}}

Revision as of 04:38, 29 December 2009

Medical condition
Gulf War syndrome

Gulf War syndrome (GWS) or Gulf War illness (GWI) describes a range of illnesses reported by combat veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War typified by a range of medically unexplained symptoms. Symptoms attributed to this syndrome have been wide-ranging and include acute and chronic ailments. These include fatigue, loss of muscle control, headaches, dizziness and loss of balance, memory problems, muscle and joint pain, indigestion, skin problems.

Since the end of the Gulf War, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the British Ministry of Defence have conducted numerous studies on Gulf War Veterans. The latest studies have determined that while the physical health of deployed veterans is similar to that of non-deployed veterans, there is an increase in 4 out of the 12 medical conditions reportedly associated with Gulf War syndrome While the exact source of veteran health complaints remains unknown, several possible causes have been investigated including post traumatic stress disorder, vaccinations, exposure to chemical weapons, smoke from oil well fires, pesticides, and depleted uranium.

In the United States in 2008, the federally mandated Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses released a 452-page report indicating that roughly 1 in 4 of the 697,000 veterans who served in the first Gulf War are afflicted with the disorder. The report stated that "scientific evidence leaves no question that Gulf War illness is a real condition with real causes and serious consequences for affected veterans." , The report concluded that use of pyridostigmine bromide pills, given to protect troops from effects of nerve agents, and pesticide use during deployment were the two conditions most closely linked to illness . Researchers have also recently narrowed impaired neuropsychological function to individuals exposed to the destruction of the Khamisiyah weapons depot where large quantities of the neurotoxin Sarin was stored.

Classification

Medial ailments associated with Gulf War Syndrome has been recognized by both the US Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, and Veterans Administration. Since so little concrete information was known about this condition the Veterans administrations originally classified individuals with related ailments believed to be connected to their service in the Persian Gulf a special non-ICD-9 code DX111, as well as ICD-9 code V65.5.

Signs and symptoms

About one-fourth of the 697,000 U.S. servicemen and women in the first Gulf War have shown symptoms related to Gulf War Syndrome.

U.S. and UK, with the highest rates of excess illness, are distinguished from the other nations by higher rates of pesticide use, use of anthrax vaccine, and somewhat higher rates of exposures to oil fire smoke and reported chemical alerts. France, with possibly the lowest illness rates, had lower rates of pesticide use, and no use of anthrax vaccine. French troops also served to the North and West of all other combat troops, away and upwind of major combat engagements .

Excess prevalence of general symptoms*
Symptom U.S. UK Australia Denmark
Fatigue 23% 23% 10% 16%
Headache 17% 18% 7% 13%
Memory problems 32% 28% 12% 23%
Muscle/joint pain 18% 17% 5% 2% (<2%)
Diarrhea 16% 9% 13%
Dyspepsia/indigestion 12% 5% 9%
Neurological problems 16% 8% 12%
Terminal tumors 33% 9% 11%
Excess prevalence of recognized medical conditions
Condition U.S. UK Canada Australia
Skin conditions 20-21% 21% 4-7% 4%
Arthritis/joint problems 6-11% 10% (-1)-3% 2%
Gastro-intestinal (GI) problems 15% 5-7% 1%
Respiratory problem 4-7% 2% 2-5% 1%
Chronic fatigue syndrome 1-4% 3% 0%
Post-traumatic stress disorder 2-6% 9% 6% 3%
Chronic multi-symptom illness 13-25% 26%

A 2001 study of 15,000 February 1991 U.S. Gulf War combat veterans and 15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8 (fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with birth defects.

Causes

The United States Congress mandated the National Academies of Science Institute of Medicine to provide nine reports on Gulf War Syndrome since 1998. Aside from the many physical and psychological issues involving any war zone deployment, Gulf War veterans were exposed to a unique mix of hazards not previously experienced during wartime. These included pyridostigmine bromide pills given to protect troops from the effects of nerve agents, depleted uranium munitions, and anthrax and botulinum vaccines. The oil and smoke that spewed for months from hundreds of burning oil wells presented another exposure hazard not previously encountered in a warzone. Military personnel also had to cope with swarms of insects, requiring the widespread use of pesticides.

United States Veterans Affairs Secretary Anthony Principi's panel found that pre-2005 studies suggested the veterans' illnesses are neurological and apparently are linked to exposure to neurotoxins, such as the nerve gas sarin, the anti-nerve gas drug pyridostigmine bromide, and pesticides that affect the nervous system. The review committee concluded that "Research studies conducted since the war have consistently indicated that psychiatric illness, combat experience or other deployment-related stressors do not explain Gulf War veterans illnesses in the large majority of ill veterans," the review committee said.

Pyridostigmine bromide nerve gas antidote

The US military issued pyridostigmine bromide pills, PB, to protect against exposure to nerve gas agents such as sarin and soman. PB was used to pretreat nerve agent poisoning and is not a vaccine however taken before exposure to nerve agents, PB was thought to increase the efficacy of nerve agent antidotes. PB had been used since 1955 for patients suffering from myasthenia gravis with dosed up to 1,500 mg a day, far in excess of the 90 mg given to soldiers, and was considered safe by the FDA at either level for indefinite use and its use to pretreat nerve agent exposure has recently been approved.

About half of U.S. Gulf War veterans report using PB during deployment, with greatest use among Army personnel. Concerns have been raised about the possibility of increased health problems from PB when it is combined with other risk factors.

Given both the large body of epidemiological data on myasthenia gravis patients and follow up studies done on veterans it was concluded that while it was unlikely that health effects reported today by Gulf War veterans are the result of exposure solely to PB, use of PB was causally associated with illness.

Organophosphate pesticides

The use of organophosphate pesticides and insect repellants during the first Gulf War is credited with keeping rates of pest-borne diseases low. Pesticide use is one of only two exposures consistently identified by Gulf War epidemiologic studies to be significantly associated with Gulf War illness. Multisymptom illness profiles similar to Gulf War illness have been associated with low-level pesticide exposures in other human populations. In addition, Gulf War studies have identified dose-response effects, indicating that greater pesticide use is more strongly associated with Gulf War illness than more limited use. Pesticide use during the Gulf War has also been associated with neurocognitive deficits and neuroendocrine alterations in Gulf War veterans in clinical studies conducted follownf the end of the war. The 2008 report concluded that “all available sources of evidence combine to support a consistent and compelling case that pesticide use during the Gulf War is causally associated with Gulf War illness.”

Sarin nerve agent

Many of the symptoms of Gulf War syndrome are similar to the symptoms of organophosphate, mustard gas, and nerve gas poisoning. Gulf War veterans were exposed to a number of sources of these compounds, including nerve gas and pesticides.

Chemical detection units from the Czech Republic, France, and Britain confirmed chemical agents. French detection units detected chemical agents. Both Czech and French forces reported detections immediately to U.S. forces. U.S. forces detected, confirmed, and reported chemical agents; and U.S. soldiers were awarded medals for detecting chemical agents. The Riegle Report said that chemical alarms went off 18,000 times during the Gulf War. After the air war started on January 16, 1991, coalition forces were chronically exposed to low but nonlethal levels of chemical and biological agents released primarily by direct Iraqi attack via missiles, rockets, artillery, or aircraft munitions and by fallout from allied bombings of Iraqi chemical warfare munitions facilities.

In 1997, the US Government released an unclassified report that stated, "The US Intelligence Community (IC) has assessed that Iraq did not use chemical weapons during the Gulf War. However, based on a comprehensive review of intelligence information and relevant information made available by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), we conclude that chemical warfare (CW) agent was released as a result of US postwar demolition of rockets with chemical warheads at several sites including Khamisiyah". Over 125,000 U.S. troops and 9,000 UK troops were exposed to nerve gas and mustard gas when the Iraqi depot in Khamisiyah was destroyed . "

Recent studies have confirmed earlier suspicions that exposure that sarin, in combination with other contaminants such as pesticides and PB were related to reports of veteran illness. Estimates range from 100,000 to 300,000 individuals exposed to nerve agents

Depleted uranium

Major Gulf War enagagements in which DU rounds were used.

Depleted uranium (DU) was widely used in tank kinetic energy penetrator and autocannon rounds for the first time in the Gulf War. DU is a dense, weakly radioactive metal with physical properties that make it particularly useful in weapons. Munitions often burn when they impact a hard target, producing toxic combustion products. Roughly 320 tons of DU were used during the conflict. After military personnel began reporting unexplained health problems in the aftermath of the Gulf War, questions were raised about the health effect of exposure to depleted uranium.

Sandia National Laboratory commissioned a two year study on the health effects of depleted uranium exposure during the Gulf War. The study found no epidemiological evidence for increase in birth defects and that claims of adverse chronic health risks from DU exposure were not supported follow up studies on veterans. A RAND Corporation study concluded that the evidence does not suggest long-term excess morbidity or mortality for DU exposure found in veterans.

The 2008 Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses similarly concluded that while there were unanswered questions about the long term effects of DU exposure, it was not likely a primary cause of Gulf War Syndrome.


Anthrax vaccine

Iraq had loaded anthrax, botulinum toxin, and aflatoxin into missiles and artillery shells in preparing for the Gulf War and that these munitions were deployed to four locations in Iraq. During Operation Desert Storm, 41% of U.S. combat soldiers and 75% of UK combat soldiers were vaccinated against anthrax. Like all vaccines, the early 1990s version of the anthrax vaccine was a source of several side effects. Reactions included local skin irritation, some lasting for weeks or months. While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the vaccine, it never went through large scale clinical trials, unlike most other vaccines in the United States. While recent studies have demonstrated the vaccine’s is highly reactogenic , there is no clear evidence or epidemiological studies on Gulf War veterans linking the vaccine to Gulf War Syndrome. Combining this with the lack of symptoms from current deployments of individuals who have received the vaccine led the Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses to conclude that the vaccine is not a likely cause of Gulf War illness for most ill veterans.

Combat stress

Research studies conducted since the war have consistently indicated that psychiatric illness, combat experience or other deployment-related stressors do not explain Gulf War veterans illnesses in the large majority of ill veterans, according to a Veterans Administration review committee.

Oil well fires

During the war, many oil wells were set on fire in Kuwait by the retreating Iraqi army, and the smoke from those fires was inhaled by large numbers of soldiers, many of whom suffered acute pulmonary and other chronic effects, including asthma and bronchitis. However, firefighters who were assigned to the oil well fires and encountered the smoke, but who did not take part in combat, have not had GWI symptoms.

Management

Diplomatic reconciliation is one means of prevention, beyond battlefield air quality management, which often conflicts with established tactical policy. For example, most organized armies practice "secure and hold" tactics which require occupation of areas before they can be decontaminated.

In 2008, a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggested that excess illnesses in Gulf War veterans could be explained in part by their exposure to organophosphate and carbamate acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. A federal report released in November, 2008, agreed, stating that exposure to two substances "are causally associated with Gulf War illness":

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (December 2009)

Epidemiology

Epidemiologic studies have been performed evaluating many suspected factors for Gulf War illness as seen in veteran populations. Below is a summary of epidemiologic studies of veterans displaying multisymptom illness and their exposure to suspect conditions from the 2008 U.S. Veterans Administration report.

Epidemiologic Studies of Gulf War Veterans: Association of Deployment Exposures With Multisymptom Illness
Preliminary Analysis (no controls for exposure) Adjusted Analysis (controlling for effects of exposure) Clinical Evaluations
GWV population in which association was assessed GWV population in which association was statistically significant GWV population in which association was assessed GWV population in which association was statistically significant Dose response effect identified?
Pyridostigmine bromide 10 9 6 6 Associated with neurocognitive and HPA differences in GW vets
Pesticides 10 10 6 5 Associated with neurocognitive and HPA differences in GW vets
Physiological Stressors 14 13 7 1
Chemical Weapons 16 13 5 3 Associated with neurocognitive and HPA differences in GW vets
Oil Well Fires 9 8 4 2
Number of Vaccines 2 2 1 1
Anthrax Vaccine 5 5 2 1
Tent Heater Exhaust 5 4 2 1
Sand/Particulates 3 3 3 1
Depleted Uranium 5 3 1 0

Controversy

Similar syndromes have been seen as an after effect of other conflicts — for example, 'shell shock' after World War I, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after the Vietnam War. A review of the medical records of 15,000 American Civil War soldiers showed that "those who lost at least 5% of their company had a 51% increased risk of later development of cardiac, gastrointestinal, or nervous disease."

A November 1996 article in the New England Journal of Medicine found no difference in death rates, hospitalization rates or self-reported symptoms between Persian Gulf veterans and non-Persian Gulf veterans. This article was a compilation of dozens of individual studies involving tens of thousands of veterans. The study did find a statistically significant elevation in the number of traffic accidents suffered by Gulf War veterans. An April, 1998 article in Emerging Infectious Diseases similarly found no increased rate of hospitalization and better health overall for veterans of the Persian Gulf War vs. Veterans who stayed home.

Despite these studies, on November 17, 2008 a congressionally appointed committee called the Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, staffed with independent scientists and veterans appointed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, announced that the syndrome is a distinct physical condition. The committee recommended that Congress increase funding for research on Gulf War veterans' health to at least $60 million per year. In January 2006, a study led by Melvin Blanchard and published by the Journal of Epidemiology, part of the "National Health Survey of Gulf War-Era Veterans and Their Families", stated that veterans deployed in the Persian Gulf War had nearly twice the prevalence of chronic multisymptom illness, a cluster of symptoms similar to a set of conditions often called Gulf War Syndrome.

See also

References

  1. Iversen A, Chalder T, Wessely S. "Gulf War Illness: lessons from medically unexplained symptoms." Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;27(7):842-54.
  2. Gronseth GS. "Gulf war syndrome: a toxic exposure? A systematic review." Neurol Clin. 2005 May;23(2):523-40.
  3. University of Virginia. Gulf War Syndrome
  4. Annals of Internal Medicine. Gulf War Veterans' Health: Medical Evaluation of a U.S. Cohort. June 7, 2005
  5. ^ Gulf War Illness and Health of Gulf War Veterans
  6. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. Neuropsychological functioning of U.S. Gulf War veterans 10 years after the war.
  7. Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses: Illnesses Associated with Gulf War Service
  8. Department of Veterans Affairs A Guide to Gulf War Veterans' Health
  9. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 78)
  10. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 68)
  11. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 70), This table applies only to coalition forces involved in combat.
  12. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 71)
  13. Kang, H.; et al. (2001). "Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Gulf War Veterans: A Population-Based Survey of 30,000 Veterans". Annals of Epidemiology. 11 (7): 504–511. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00245-9. PMID 11557183. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |journal= (help)
  14. VA Press Release
  15. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses 2004 Report
  16. PBS Frontline. PYRIDOSTIGMINE BROMIDE Use in the First Gulf War
  17. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Special Assistant to the Undersecretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) for Gulf War Illnesses Medical Readiness and Military Deployments. Environmental Exposure Report: Pesticides Final Report. Washington, D.C. April 17, 2003.
  18. Krengel M, Sullivan K. Neuropsychological Functioning in Gulf War Veterans Exposed to Pesticides and Pyridostigmine Bromide. Fort Detrick, MD: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command; August, 2008. W81XWH-04-1-0118
  19. Friis, Robert H. (2004). Epidemiology for Public Health Practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. ISBN 0763731706. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  20. Spektor, Dalia M. (1998). A Review of the Scientific Literature as it Pertains to Gulf War Illnesses. Rand Corporation. ISBN 0833026801. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  21. "Campaigners hail 'nerve gas link' to Gulf War Syndrome - Scotsman.com News". News.scotsman.com. Retrieved 2009-11-24.
  22. The Riegle Report
  23. Khamisiyah: A Historical Perspective on Related Intelligence by the Persian Gulf War Illnesses Task Force (9 April 1997)
  24. Beatrice Alexandra Golomb.Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and Gulf War illnesses
  25. Navy Times. Review says chemicals caused Gulf War illness
  26. Global Security. ``Depleted Uranium``
  27. Al Marshal, Sandia National Laboratory. An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects Using a Gulf War Case Study, Albert C. Marshall, Sandia National Laboratories
  28. Harley NH, Foulkes EC, Hilborne LH, Hudson A, Anthony CR. A Review of the Scientific Literature As It Pertains to Gulf War Illnessess: Depleted Uranium. Vol 7. Arlington, VA: National Defense Research Institute (RAND); 1999
  29. Anthony H. Cordesman. Iraq and the War of Sanctions: Conventional Threats and Weapons of Mass Destruction
  30. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (page 73.)
  31. GAO-01-92T Anthrax Vaccine: Preliminary Results of GAO's Survey of Guard/Reserve Pilots and Aircrew Members
  32. The Clarion-Ledger: Mississippi's News Source
  33. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.Short-term reactogenicity and gender effect of anthrax vaccine: analysis of a 1967-1972 study and review of the 1955-2005 medical literature
  34. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes (pages 148, 154, 156)
  35. Curle, A. (1997) "Public mental health. III: Hatred and reconciliation." Med Confl Surviv 13(1):37-47. PMID 9080785
  36. ^ Jentleson, B.W. (1996) "Preventive Diplomacy and Ethnic Conflict: Possible, Difficult, Necessary" UC Berkeley Policy Paper 27, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation
  37. Golomb, B. (2008) "Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and Gulf War illnesses" Proc Natl Acad Sci; Reuters; MedPageToday.com
  38. "Gulf War illness is real, new federal report says" on CNN
  39. Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses December 12-13, 2005 Committee Meeting Minutes
  40. Gulf War Illness and Health of Gulf War Veterans (page 220-221)
  41. Gulf War Illness and Health of Gulf War Veterans (page 222)
  42. Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.812, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1126/science.291.5505.812 instead.
  43. New England Journal of Medicine. Disease and Suspicion after the Persian Gulf War. Volume 335:1525-1527, November 14, 1996
  44. Knoke JD, Gray GC (1998). "Hospitalizations for unexplained illnesses among U.S. veterans of the Persian Gulf War" (PDF). Emerging Infect. Dis. 4 (2): 211–9. PMC 2640148. PMID 9621191.
  45. News Services, "Gulf War Syndrome Is Real, Panel Concludes", Washington Post, November 18, 2008, p. 14.
  46. Record: Study finds multisymptom condition is more prevalent among Persian Gulf vets

External links

Research
Associations
Categories: