Misplaced Pages

Infraparticle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:56, 29 December 2009 edit76.195.136.246 (talk) Minor- (changed 'which' to 'that' in restrictive clause, etc.)← Previous edit Revision as of 18:24, 31 December 2009 edit undoJForget (talk | contribs)108,664 edits Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Infraparticle closed as no consensusNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{AfDM|page=Infraparticle|logdate=2009 December 10|substed=yes}}
<!-- For administrator use only: {{Oldafdfull|page=Infraparticle|date=10 December 2009|result='''keep'''}} -->
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
{{expert-subject|Physics|date=December 2009}} {{expert-subject|Physics|date=December 2009}}
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} {{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}}

Revision as of 18:24, 31 December 2009

This article needs attention from an expert in Physics. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. WikiProject Physics may be able to help recruit an expert. (December 2009)
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Infraparticle" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader. (November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article reads like a textbook. Please improve this article to make it neutral in tone and meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. (November 2009)

In electrodynamics and quantum electrodynamics, in addition to the global U(1) symmetry related to the electric charge, there are also position dependent gauge transformations. Noether's theorem states that for every infinitesimal symmetry transformation that is local (local in the sense that the transformed value of a field at a given point only depends on the field configuration in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of that point), there is a corresponding conserved charge called the Noether charge, which is the space integral of a Noether density (assuming the integral converges and there is a Noether current satisfying the continuity equation).

If this is applied to the global U(1) symmetry, the result

Q = d 3 x ρ ( x ) {\displaystyle Q=\int d^{3}x\rho ({\vec {x}})} (over all of space)

is the conserved charge where ρ is the charge density. As long as the surface integral

S 2 J d S {\displaystyle \oint _{S^{2}}{\vec {J}}\cdot d{\vec {S}}}

at the boundary at spatial infinity is zero, which is satisfied if the current density J falls off sufficiently fast, the quantity Q is conserved. This is nothing other than the familiar electric charge.

But what if there is a position dependent (but not time dependent) infinitesimal gauge transformation δ ψ ( x ) = i q α ( x ) ψ ( x ) {\displaystyle \delta \psi ({\vec {x}})=iq\alpha ({\vec {x}})\psi ({\vec {x}})} where α is some function of position?

The Noether charge is now

d 3 x [ α ( x ) ρ ( x ) + ϵ 0 E ( x ) α ( x ) ] {\displaystyle \int d^{3}x\left}

where E {\displaystyle {\vec {E}}} is the electric field.

Using integration by parts,

S 2 α E d S + d 3 x α [ ρ ϵ 0 E ] {\displaystyle \oint _{S^{2}}\alpha {\vec {E}}\cdot d{\vec {S}}+\int d^{3}x\alpha \left}

This assumes that the state in question approaches the vacuum asymptotically at spatial infinity. The first integral is the surface integral at spatial infinity and the second integral is zero by the Gauss law. Also assume that α(r,θ,φ) approaches α(θ,φ) as r approaches infinity (in polar coordinates). Then, the Noether charge only depends upon the value of α at spatial infinity but not upon the value of α at finite values. This is consistent with the idea that symmetry transformations not affecting the boundaries are gauge symmetries whereas those that do are global symmetries. If α(θ,φ)=1 all over the S, we get the electric charge. But for other functions, we also get conserved charges (which are not so well known).

This conclusion holds both in classical electrodynamics as well as in quantum electrodynamics. If α is taken as the spherical harmonics, conserved scalar charges (the electric charge) are seen as well as conserved vector charges and conserved tensor charges. This is not a violation of the Coleman-Mandula theorem as there is no mass gap. In particular, for each direction (a fixed θ and φ), the quantity

lim r ϵ 0 r 2 E r ( r , θ , ϕ ) {\displaystyle \lim _{r\rightarrow \infty }\epsilon _{0}r^{2}E_{r}(r,\theta ,\phi )}

is a c-number and a conserved quantity. Using the result that states with different charges exist in different superselection sectors, the conclusion that states with the same electric charge but different values for the directional charges lie in different superselection sectors.

Even though this result is expressed in terms of a particular spherical coordinates, in particular with a given origin, it is easy to see that translations changing the origin do not affect spatial infinity.

The directional charges are different for an electron that has always been at rest and an electron that has always been moving at a certain nonzero velocity (because of the Lorentz transformations). The conclusion is that both electrons lie in different superselection sectors no matter how tiny the velocity is. At first sight, this might appear to be in contradiction with Wigner's classification, which implies that the whole one-particle Hilbert space lies in a single superselection sector, but it is not because m is really the greatest lower bound of a continuous mass spectrum and eigenstates of m only exist in a rigged Hilbert space. The electron, and other particles like it is called an infraparticle.

The existence of the directional charges is related to soft photons. The directional charge at t = {\displaystyle t=-\infty } and t = {\displaystyle t=\infty } are the same if we take the limit as r goes to infinity first and only then take the limit as t approaches infinity. If we interchange the limits, the directional charges change. This is related to the expanding electromagnetic waves spreading outwards at the speed of light (the soft photons).

More generally, there might exist a similar situation in other quantum field theories besides QED. The name "infraparticle" still applies in those cases.

Categories: