Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:22, 2 January 2006

Welcome to the user talk page of I, Hollow Wilerding, also known as Courtni Wilerding.

"When you believe... the sky doesn't seem so high after all."
"Paradise is but imagination."
"To accomplish something is to ready, set, go."

Hello from Eddie Re: Your Nomination

Hey,

I recently noticed Your Misplaced Pages:RFA nomination failed miserably. I also tried about a month ago with the same results. It's good to know I'm in good company. -- Eddie 04:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Votestacking on FAC: sockpuppets

Hi, Hollow. A CheckUser check performed by Kelly Martin has confirmed that you, Winnermario, and DrippingInk are the same editor "or at least share the same connection". Please see my post at the administrators' noticeboard. Bishonen | talk 11:20, 1 January 2006 (UTC).

Luxurious (song)

I did it. Extraordinary Machine 15:42, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it appears as though you did. Excuse my lazy eyes today, as this is an example of New Year's Eve night. Nonetheless, let's continue contributing this year too! By the way, don't leave Misplaced Pages, because your edits are excellent. (November is quite impressive.) Happy new year! —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Block message

Crossposted from WP:ANI

All right, here's what I'm going to do about the editor. I deduce from Raul's message that he's against banning HW from FAC; therefore, I will block the Hollow Wilerding account for one week for disruption, abusive sockpuppetry, and inveterate deception. I'm sorry, but User:DrippingInk will remain indefinitely blocked, since I can't postulate that HW has any credibility at all, after all her twists and turns, always with the word "honesty" in her mouth. I have also blocked the new sock account User:Siblings CW indefinitely. To Hollow Wilerding: if you have any interest in continuing to edit this site, don't evade this block by creating any new accounts whatsoever during the block. If you have any more sock accounts already established, don't use them while you're blocked. Note that during the block, you can still edit your own talk page, and people will be watching it. You can also e-mail any administrator, or e-mail the Misplaced Pages:Mailing list, if you wish to protest the block. I'm cross-posting this message to User talk:Hollow Wilerding. Any objections, comments? Bishonen | talk 22:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC).

I don't agree with this block. Hollow Wilerding seems to be an excellent editor, albeit one who has flaws regarding community interaction; although the recent situation raises concerns, it will not help us to have her blocked for a week when she could be using that time to work on articles. The correct remedy: no blocks, but Majora's Mask needs a revote and henceforth any of these suspected sock accounts can't vote alongside Hollow, although they will be otherwise free to edit. Everyking 22:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

User:Everyking, I would appreciate it you attempted to remove this block. I explained that it was none of their businesses why we kept it a secret; this is our computer, our IP address, and not theirs. We did not have to come clean about the situation if we did not feel like it, and that was the case. User:DrippingInk and I created the new account so that we could edit together under the same name so as to avoid controversy of the same IP address again; however, since User:Bishonen has this immense grudge against me, (s)he completely ignored the entire case. They went ahead and blocked the new account. Therefore, next Monday, I will have an RfC ready to go. Misplaced Pages is setting a disgusting example for its users who do not wish to reveal what they are "hiding" or in this case not revealing. Moreover, I may even go as far as suing the Misplaced Pages Foundation for misuse of allowing its users to block innocent victims. One can waste their time editing for weeks until finally achieving a featured article, but then because they have other people using the same computer as them, they will have their article stripped of its status, and they will then be blocked for a week. That's a terrible example. The sysop abilities are disgusting, and I may also file an RfC against that as well. Two RfCs. Pathetic, isn't it for you? I require help for this week, but when I come back, it isn't going to be pretty. A new account is once again going to be established for DrippingInk and myself to use come our return. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

HW:

1. Whatever you do, don't let all this discourage you. You're a fantastic editor.
2. Don't make legal threats. It's immature, and makes you look as such. Legal threats are also a good way to get oneself blocked forever.

Search4LancerFile:Pennsylvania state flag.png 00:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

You are right, User:Search4Lancer. I'm not going to bother with legal threats because, first and solely, it will be a waste of my time. Not because of anything else; only because it will be a waste of my time. Otherwise, I will definitely be filing an RfC, as blocking someone for one entire week even after attempting to compromise, materialising the compromise (User:Siblings CW), and then watching the compromise be killed. User:Bishonen is exercising poor usage of the sysop abilities. (S)he failed to allow me to dodge the bullet even if I were to have received some extreme warning, which would still fail to impress me considering, I must say it again, it is nobody's business whether I had revealed the multiple usage of the computer I am currently accessing or not. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 00:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Looking at the administrators board, User:Bishonen is continulously convinced that I am three people, and fails to register the policy assume good faith. Someone get another sysop in here or something, an end needs to be put to this notorious incident! —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct/Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; I'll just be keeping this wikilink on my talk page so that I don't have to continuously type it into the search box every time I log on to Misplaced Pages. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 00:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Here is a message posted by User:Bishonen at the administrators' board regarding the incident: IOW, a new multiuser (that's not allowed) sock (not that, either) account to replace the one I blocked a few hours ago.

...Wow. I am devastated. So multi-users are not allowed, are they? Then we have a huge issue. If multi-users are not allowed, why have User:DrippingInk and User:Winnermario been blocked? If we can't have a shared account, then we have no choice but to access individual accounts, and as it stands, that's going to be under the same IP address! Yet for some peculiar reason, both of the accounts in mention above have been blocked! That means both William and Mariah will have to create new accounts, yet I am positive User:Bishonen will block them again because (s)he will assume that they are sock puppets all over again! What a terrible issue this is! I hereby demand myself to be unblocked so that I can file the RfC right now. You seem to have cut a thread.

1. You never told me that a multi-user account was prohibited, so therefore, you call it "another sock puppet account".
2. You continue to believe that User:DrippingInk and User:Winnermario are sock puppets.
3. You have failed to register Misplaced Pages:Assume Good Faith.
4. It doesn't appear as though you read any of my responses and comments at the administrators' board. Does this indicate you wanted to ensure my block?
5. It was my decision not to tell the entire Misplaced Pages community that we shared a computer. Therefore, you cannot assume bad faith, yet you never assumed good faith either.
6. User:Bishonen has abused his/her sysop abilities, and should be stripped of them immediately.

—Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 01:19, 2 January 2006 (UTC)