| Revision as of 16:18, 7 January 2010 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm →Ping: tweaking← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:59, 8 January 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 1d) to User talk:Atmoz/Archive 4.Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| <!-- Please do not post above this line. Thanks. :-) --> | <!-- Please do not post above this line. Thanks. :-) --> | ||
| == Ping == | |||
| I sent you an e-mail. --] (]) 16:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Got it. Not sure why you sent it to me. -] (]) 23:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for the implied interest which accompanies uncertainty. As a gesture of appreciation, please allow me to share a rhetorical question from the : "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?" | |||
| ::I've sent another e-mail, attempting to begin to explain why I contacted you. --] (]) 07:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Rajendra_K._Pachauri == | |||
| Hi you reverted the article citing ] however this has been refuted as a reason for non-inclusion, i quote ''Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy requires all biographical material, whether positive, negative or neutral, to be reliably sourced.'' As the material is reliably sourced then ] is not a valid argument for reverting | |||
| Given your reason for the revert was a mistake would you care to self revert? | |||
| I would also like to point out there was a consensus for inclusion of this text and one of the editors previously against the inclusion of it has since expanded on it without complaint. This user was chriso. | |||
| At the last count there was most certainly a consensus for inclusion of this text and i would ask you self revert and take any further issues to the article talk. | |||
| Thank you --] (]) 21:34, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : The incompatibility of "at the last count" and ] should give you a little hint of why you're wrong ] (]) 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: Consensus != 100% Agreement. But of course you knew that already. --] (]) 02:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Take it to the article talk page. -] (]) 02:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::You say take it to the talk page? You reverted content which you have not even taken part in discussing, I have looked through the article talk page in the section about this content and fail to see your name anywere. I also do not see you on talk explaining your reversion. I ask again please self revert. ] (]) 07:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:59, 8 January 2010
Template:Community article probation
 | Leave a new message. Unless you request otherwise, I will respond here. If I left a message on your talk page, please respond there. Discuss article on the article talk page. Do not add template messages. They will be reverted without comment. --User:Atmoz |
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |