| Revision as of 01:21, 11 August 2009 editKudpung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors109,221 edits →Victorian Architecture: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:59, 9 January 2010 edit undo122.177.218.88 (talk) →FC: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| ] Hi {{PAGENAME}}! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see ], address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.--] (]) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ] Hi {{PAGENAME}}! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see ], address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.--] (]) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == FC == | |||
| A vandal named ] is trying to destroy the ] article. He tried two times (]) to delete it, but his intentions were exposed by other users. See his latest attempt to get the article destroyed ]. ] (]) 11:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:59, 9 January 2010
| Leave a message |
| Comments left on this page will be replied to on this page, unless you specifically request otherwise. |
| If I've left a message on your talk page, I'll be watching it, so you can reply there if you'd like. |
- Archive 1 - Alameda Measure A archive
- Archive 2 - Engineering-related talk archive
- Archive 3 - Discussions about nationalist revisionism
- Archive 4 - The Barrington/YouTube/Sir Nicholas mess
- Archive 5 - General political topics talk archive
- Archive 6 - IRA AfDs archive
- Archive 7 - Cluebat archive, in which various users (including me) are administered clue. It sticks, sometimes.
- Archive 8 - everything else up through April 2008
- Archive 9 - Random discussions which don't categorize elsewhere
- Archive 10 - Discussions about University Students' Cooperative Association houses
Greek civil war
Removing cited material, arguing that this is "weasel word" is totally unacceptable. I added a UN report, I added scholars from both sides and you revert that, arguing what?! That it is weasel word!! Come on now! This is a totally unacceptable excuse! Both sided deserve mentioning in the article! And I was searching all day in Google Book to find all these sources, which you reverted with one click! I hope you know that such reverting is on the verge of vandalism.
Argyriou I lost relatives in the Civil War by the communists, but I'll not jeopardize Misplaced Pages's encyclopedic NPOV for this reason. I hope this is the case for you as well!--Yannismarou (talk) 11:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD
I've nominated Obama Republican and McCain Democrat for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Have fun. I don't care, and probably won't show up to the AfD discussion. Argyriou (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:911tm
Template:911tm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Noticed you in one of the template's previous afd's.Sloane (talk) 16:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Homeowners Association Central link on Homeowners Association Website Page
Hello, you don't know me, but I wanted to take a moment of your time to get your opinion on a dispute I'm having with a wikipedia editor. if you visit the page on "Homeowners Association", and look at the discussion, the dissent is about a link I placed on the page to the website "Homeowners Association Websites Central." A certain editor "Wangi" not only believes that I have no right to place the link in the external links section, but further has accused me of starting bogus accounts as new users simply to add this link. I figure if I get some well known wikipedians to look at the situation, the link, and add their opinion to the debate, then at least I will know that the crazy accusations of user fraud will stop. Boy, who would have thought this would be such a hassle. Anyway the url for the link in question is http://www.athomenet.com/homenew/homeowners-association-websites-central.asp , and you can see the long history by looking at the history log on the homeowners association page.... Please, whatever your opinion may be, place it in the discussion area page in the topic of external links of Homeowners association central, and if you think the content is helpful, please add or undo wangi's deletion of the page. I will respect whatever your opinion is. Thank you: Edenrage (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Victorian Architecture
Hi Argyriou! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Victorian architecture, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
FC
A vandal named ikonoblast is trying to destroy the FC article. He tried two times (2007 & 2009) to delete it, but his intentions were exposed by other users. See his latest attempt to get the article destroyed here. 122.177.218.88 (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)