Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:48, 10 January 2010

This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language.

Archives

I, II, III

HI ALL!!!!!

Hi, everyone! I just wanted to say hello, and to inform you that you can write to me here, and i will answer in the best possible way...

Best wish!!

Mladifilozof

Moramo plakati i pisati o zločinima koje je naša država počinili prema Drugima, ne bi li smo se na taj način iskupili.--Mladifilozof (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Ajoj druže, pa ne radi se to na vikipediji, nego u crkvi. Ovo služi za mnogo lepše i sveobuhvatnije stvari nego što su naša iskupljenja za ratne zločine. Moraš priznati, nije li malo licemerno da to radiš ovde, na en wiki, a ne kod nas na srpskoj? Ipak tamo je to mnogo efikasnije nego ovde, gde ima 10 srpskih editora u vrh glave... Ajde da se dogovorimo ko ljudi. Reci mi sve šta hoćeš da postigneš, da radimo zajedno, a ne da se pitam šta je autor hteo da kaže. Ipak smo kolege po balkanu. :) Ja još manje odobravam zločine nego što misliš. Ali moramo biti neutralni, po svaku cenu. --Tadija (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Translation.

We must post and write about about atrocities that our country is committed to others, so we can be redeemed.--Mladifilozof (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow man, you dont do that on Misplaced Pages, but in the church. This is used for much better things and more comprehensive than our redemption for war crimes. You have to admit, is a bit hypocritical to do here, on en wiki, and not in Serbian wiki? There is much more active people than here, where there are 10 editors in the Serbian top of the head ... Let the people who agree. Tell me what you all want to achieve, to work together, not to wonder what the author wanted to say. However, we counterparts in the Balkans. :) I even less allow crimes than you think. But we must be neutral, at any price. --Tadija (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Petar I

Pozdrav.Mozes li mi rec odakle i kako to da kao kompozitor (mislis da) toliko znas o mojoj drzavi,pa tako bezobrazno ispravljas sve clanke za nju vezane? Petar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.12.183 (talk) 02:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Pozdrav.Za to oko jezika nisam znao,ako je tako,onda necu mijenjati dok se ne steknu uslovi,mada mislim da bi bilo bolje da samo stoji cirilica,dok se to pitanje ne rijesi,ali OK,cinjenica je da je u to doba zvanicni jezik bio Srpski,tako da to moze proci.Ono sto je takodje cinjenica jeste da je crnogorska crkva bila autokefalna i to u Crnoj Gori vise uopste nije sporno,ono oko cega se spore jeste ko je njen pravni nasljednik CPC ili Mitropolija Crnogorsko-Primorska SPC.Ako nista,povedi se prostom logikom-Petar I je bio na celu drzave,koja je bila potpuno izolovana od okruzenja u kojem su u to doba Turci kontrolisali prakticno sve.Ne mislis valjda da nije bio samostalan u odlucivanju?

Da ne duzim,dobar izvor je "Ustav za Knjazevinu Crnu Goru" iz 1905. u kome se doslovno kaze:“Državna vjera je u Crnoj Gori istočno pravoslavna. Crnogorska je crkva autokefalna. Ona ne zavisi ni od koje strane Crkve, ali održava jedinstvo u dogmama s istočno pravoslavnom Vaseljenskom crkvom. Sve ostale priznate vjeroispovijesti slobodne su u Crnoj Gori”. Takodje,clanak "Serb clans" je sve samo ne neutralan.Neutralno bi bilo "Clans in Montenegro",dje bi se stavilo do znanja da u Crnoj Gori postoji toliko i toliko plemena i da se dio pripadnika tih plemena izjasnjava kao Crnogorci,a dio kao Srbi i moze se jos navesti da je to politicka podjela,bez ocjenjivanja ko je u pravu,a ko ne.Tu je vec vazno ko odakle dolazi,jer ja kao stanovnik Crne Gore sigurno mnogo bolje znam situaciju.Ja sam inace iz plemena Vasojevici,dje se vecina pripadnika neosporno smatra Srbima,ali takodje ima i znacajan broj onih koji se izjasnjavaju Crnogorcima,medju kojima sam i ja.Takva plemena su jos Kuci,Drobnjaci...Sa druge strane,smijesno je nazivat "srpskim plemenima" ona koja poticu iz okoline Cetinja,dje su Crnogorci,malo je rec u apsolutnoj vecini.Sta hocu da kazem?Kad bih se malo potrudio,garantujem ti da bi ovaj clanak("Serb tribes") mogao da osvane u novinama,jer je to klasicni primjer,bez uvrede,fasizma.Na stranu to sto se na mapi,od svih teritorija na kojima Srbi zive,srpska plemena nalaze jedino u CG.Malo neutralnosti nije na odmet. Registrovacu se uskoro,samo sto jos nisam bas najbolje upoznat sa nacinom na koji wikipedia funkcionise,pa sam zato i pomislio da si kompozitor,jer to pise na tvojoj stranici(This user is composer):-).Srecna nova... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.12.183 (talk) 19:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Translation.

Hello. Can you tell me where and how is it that as a composer (think you) know so much about my country, so ispravljas articles related to it? Petar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.12.183 (talk) 02:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello. For that I knew about the language, if so, then I will not change until the conditions are met, although I think it would be better to just stand Cyrillic, while this issue is not solved, but OK, the fact is that at the time the official language a Serbian, so that it can proci.Ono which is also the fact is that the Montenegrin church was autonomous and in Montenegro in general is more controversial, what about the spores of which is who is her legal heir or CPC metropolis of Montenegro and Littoral SOC. If not, take a simple logic-Peter was the head of state, which was completely isolated from the environment in which the Turks at that time controlled practically sve.Ne think that probably was not independent in decision-making? If not more, a good source of the "Constitution of the Principality of Montenegro from 1905th which literally says: "Public faith in Montenegro, the Eastern Orthodox. The Montenegrin Church is autonomous. It does not depend on either side of the Church, but maintains the unity of the dogmas with the Eastern Orthodox Ecumenical Church. All other recognized religions are free to Montenegro. " Also, the article "Serb clans" has all but neutralan.Neutralno would be "Clans in Montenegro", dje be put to the knowledge that in Montenegro there are so many tribes and that the part of members of these tribes speak as Montenegrins, and part Serbs and can be even specify that it is a political division, without assessing who is right and who is already ne.Tu matter who comes from where, because I as a citizen of Montenegro certainly much better I know situaciju.Ja or from tribes Vasojević , dje most of doubt as Serbs, but also has a significant number of those who declare themselves Montenegrins, among which I ja.Takva tribes were still at home, Drobnjaci ... On the other hand, the MF is called "Serbian tribes" that she come from the vicinity of Cetinje, dje are Montenegrins, it is the absolute word vecini.Sta I mean? If I were a little effort, I guarantee you that this article ( "Serb Tribes") could dawns in the newspapers because it is a classic example without insult, fasizma.Na page to which the map of all territories where Serbs live, the Serbian tribes are only CG.Malo neutrality is not worth. Register soon, just as I have not just the best acquainted with the way Misplaced Pages is functioning, and so I thought you were a composer, because it writes on your page (This user is a composer ):-). Happy new ..

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.222.12.183 (talk) 19:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tadija! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 15 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Madlena Janković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Montenegrin.

Yeah, that is the readiness for compromise characteristical for most of the Serbian wiki editors... However, it does not seem logical to identify putting the country´s official language as inappropriate on that country-related articles, regardless of the ISO standards. It should at least stand next to Serbian, if we leave the nationalist emotions aside and use simple logic and common sense. Sideshow Bob 14:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

You said it is official only in Montenegro, which is true, but you continue saying that it is not a sufficient reason to involve it in the articles. Where should it be official then, to fulfill you "objective" criteria? Also, I see you are reverting some of my previous edits, so I want to inform you I might have to report your behavior if you continue do be disruptive. And dont worry about me being blocked, I have been around here long enough to know the rules of the game. Sideshow Bob 14:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Edit wars/blind reverts

Hello. I see you have been reverting quite a few edits related to Serbia and Montenegro with edit summaries such as "Reverted 1 edit by 70.107.83.197; Revert blocked user's IP sock." and "Reverted 1 edit by Sideshow Bob; Montenegrin is not ISO-recognised language."

There are a number of problems with this: You have not tagged the IP as a sock of any user, nor have you provided any evidence. You really should use the {{ipsock}} or similar template to ensure folks looking at the situation have enough context to understand your edits. Otherwise it appears disruptive as we have seen every made-up excuse under the sun for reverting edits for Balkan-related articles. As far as reverting language edits, you need to establish consensus on a talk page somewhere and it would be highly useful to include that talk page in your edit summary so that anyone looking at this mass reversion to Balkan-related articles will understand that your edits are not disruptive. As is is, it appears you are edit warring with more than one editor about content disuputes on Balkan-related articles.

I'm sure you're aware that in a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. I'm assuming good faith on your part an hoping you will provide the additional information going forward. Either way, edit warring is not OK. Best, Toddst1 (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the follow-up. While you were leaving this note, I was querying Prodego on the same issue. Best regards. Toddst1 (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tuzla column case has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Misplaced Pages. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrjj-rjpMZc (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Misplaced Pages's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Serbian Wiki

Language cant have any country flag. I havent never seen any language marked with country flag. --93.87.151.93 (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

English Misplaced Pages

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Misplaced Pages, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. It is a mistake to think that communications in English Misplaced Pages are private conversations. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 1 January 2010

• News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more

• In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Hi

What are you talking about? I was updating Zlaš, to take into account the fact that since 1999 Kosovo has no longer been part of Serbia. Two years ago the Kosovo parliment voted 100% to be independent. While a political article (eg ]) should mention that Serbia maintains a historical claim to Kosovo, I don't see why a article about geography should not be updated. 2007apm (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

?

Can you please answer me on my talk page? I asked you a question and you still didn't answer :-). Rave92 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Lets end this

Let´s block him from editing Serbia related articles. He´ll suffer in the future. FkpCascais (talk) 22:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)