| Revision as of 00:24, 11 January 2010 editJulzes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,061 editsm →In fact, there may be a lull: typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:26, 11 January 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →In fact, there may be a lull: A very odd way of defining "lull".Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.] (]) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.] (]) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : A very odd way of defining "lull". --] 00:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:26, 11 January 2010
I'm bullied by the cyber-thugs on Misplaced Pages. If you ever try to question the information that users present as cannon on wikipedia, you get shot down in about 30 seconds. So liberalism has run amuk on Misplaced Pages, i.e. they only allow glowing information about their dear leader, President Barack Hussein Obama. They only allow alarmist, wild, wacky claims that the earth is warming, when in fact, it is cooling, and the list goes on and on. It appears that Misplaced Pages is just another appendage of the wild, leftist, lame-stream media run amuk with liberal ideaologies and theories.
GW Discussion
Would you be so kind to start the discussion about this diff? ChyranandChloe (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
In fact, there may be a lull
There really should be something about this in the article, but in reality it's best not handled at all than handled badly. Whatever lull we're in is part of an opposite trend that is quite alarmingly serious.Julzes (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- What lull? We've just had what is, on some measures, the hottest decade since records began. --TS 00:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The record temperature for a single year was set over a decade ago and if anything there has been a slight decline since that (but still allowing your hottest decade thing). That amounts to a lull. I refer you to various sources on this including Science magazine, 2 October 2009, pp.28-9.Julzes (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- A very odd way of defining "lull". --TS 00:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)