Revision as of 02:53, 11 January 2010 editPlutonium27 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,604 edits →Speedy Deletion: Notifying authors: editsums← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:59, 16 January 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/January.Next edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Automated investing that selects equities to invest in by comparing the value of a company based on fundamental accounting details and present market value. The idea is that fund managers are extraordinarily expensive and their performance is often less than black-box investing in the same style. ] | Automated investing that selects equities to invest in by comparing the value of a company based on fundamental accounting details and present market value. The idea is that fund managers are extraordinarily expensive and their performance is often less than black-box investing in the same style. ] | ||
== sharing my experience in how to get your electronic systems improved == | |||
<i>Message deleted by Peridon as being spam. ] (]) 12:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)</i> | |||
Takkie - Standardpcb <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Speedy Deletion: Notifying authors == | |||
Hi Peridon. ] has already noted (above, on 17 Dec), that you don't seem to be informing the authors of the articles that you tag for speedy deletion. You tagged the article ] at 00.48 10 Jan but no notice appeared on the author's talkpage - ] - although you continued to edit for a while afterwards. '''It is vitally important that we constructively welcome new users''' by helping them understand and rectify any problems with their edits: for them to find their first effort has been speedily deleted without the courtesy of being directly informed it was under such consideration could put them off continuing altogether. Please take care to always inform authors by copy and pasting the tag - and, for newbies, consider adding a friendly note, like directing them to the appropriate article-writing guidelines, for eg. ] (]) 07:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
* Could you please also remember to add edit summaries after your contributions - you can enable an option in 'My Preferences' to automatically prompt you after each edit. ] (]) 02:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Speedy Deletion: Why was my page deleted - and w/out notice? == | == Speedy Deletion: Why was my page deleted - and w/out notice? == |
Revision as of 15:59, 16 January 2010
Just in case anyone wants to talk to me.... Peridon (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC) The rest of this is archived somewhere. Haven't found it yet, but I will.
Fivemiletown
Oh no it's alright. Live the section on it - I don't mind. unknowneditor
To Bloviate Is Divine
We appreciate you're willingness to see the possibilties! :) We hope you have a laugh. http://geddongear.com/wackapedia.aspx
Optimal Money Management
See kelly criterion, much of William Ziemba's work or read Ralph Vince's book "The Handbook of Portfolio Mathematics". There is essentially one percentage of your wealth that you should put at risk in any given investment. Risking more than double the optimal ensures ruin, risking less than optimal you forgo geometric gain and only preserve artimetic, risking more ensures no more geometric gain but potentially greater artimetic loss talk
Mechanistic Value Investing
Automated investing that selects equities to invest in by comparing the value of a company based on fundamental accounting details and present market value. The idea is that fund managers are extraordinarily expensive and their performance is often less than black-box investing in the same style. talk
Speedy Deletion: Why was my page deleted - and w/out notice?
Hello Peridon - I recently created my first wiki article complete with more than 30 references and as many external links. I logged in this morning add additional information to the page and was greeted with a page indicating that it had been deleted via Speedy Deletion per your action. I am disappointed that I did not receive notice of this - and was not given a chance to defend my article. The reason stated on the page for deletion was:
A tag has been placed on Gunnar Peterson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time
I cited many sources indicating how this person is notable. Arguably credible media outlets such as CNN and Sports Illustrated assert that he is "the" expert in his industry. I also followed a similar (albeit mine more thoroughly written) format used on other current wiki pages for same industry professionals - i.e.:http://en.wikipedia.org/Jillian_Michaels_(personal_trainer)
I see where another administrator re-tagged the page to drop the parenthesis industry clarification. But after their edit - you used Speedy Deletion. Is this in error? My original page location is at this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/Gunnar_Peterson_(Personal_Trainer,_Fitness_Expert) I am eager to learn wiki best practices - and have MANY references if there is simply a question or concern about the content I have included.
Please advise, as I am anxious to begin other articles - but do not want to repeat a mistake if I am in error and continue to have articles deleted.
Thank you in advance for your time and guidance. Best!