| Revision as of 21:43, 4 January 2006 editBonaparte (talk | contribs)3,954 edits I think is up to you to make also compromise← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 4 January 2006 edit undoFormer user 20 (talk | contribs)2,136 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==mediation== | ==mediation== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
| I still believe that you can contribute to the article in which was asked for mediation ]. So now, I think is up to you to make also compromise since on the talk page there is already a solution of compromise. You should be aware that '''not''' reaching '''now''' the compromise will lead to escalation and eventually even worst situations. I suggest you that you can avoid all this by simply proposing in such a manner that you can convince the other side that's worth to be mentioned in the article. I wish you success. ] ] 21:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | I still believe that you can contribute to the article in which was asked for mediation ]. So now, I think is up to you to make also compromise since on the talk page there is already a solution of compromise. You should be aware that '''not''' reaching '''now''' the compromise will lead to escalation and eventually even worst situations. I suggest you that you can avoid all this by simply proposing in such a manner that you can convince the other side that's worth to be mentioned in the article. I wish you success. ] ] 21:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : As of now, there is no compromise. There is only deletion. If you are truly a Cabal mediator interested in helping, then I suggest you do something to help. Several people have ignored your ruling/suggestion in the matter. You seemingly don't care. Now, I'd appreciate it if you either recommended the matter go to formal mediation or you step in and let your voice be heard regarding the compromise. The people involved, I know them too well, are not interested in compromise. They are only interested in pardoning one of their own because they have the same vice as he. --] 22:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:14, 4 January 2006
mediation
Hello Jason,
I still believe that you can contribute to the article in which was asked for mediation Mark K. Bilbo. So now, I think is up to you to make also compromise since on the talk page there is already a solution of compromise. You should be aware that not reaching now the compromise will lead to escalation and eventually even worst situations. I suggest you that you can avoid all this by simply proposing in such a manner that you can convince the other side that's worth to be mentioned in the article. I wish you success. Bonaparte talk 21:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- As of now, there is no compromise. There is only deletion. If you are truly a Cabal mediator interested in helping, then I suggest you do something to help. Several people have ignored your ruling/suggestion in the matter. You seemingly don't care. Now, I'd appreciate it if you either recommended the matter go to formal mediation or you step in and let your voice be heard regarding the compromise. The people involved, I know them too well, are not interested in compromise. They are only interested in pardoning one of their own because they have the same vice as he. --Jason Gastrich 22:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)