| Revision as of 15:46, 21 January 2010 editStone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,140 editsm →History: removed one empty line← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:51, 21 January 2010 edit undoHeadbomb (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors453,900 edits ce refsNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ] in 1802 and ] in 1814 described the dark lines within the ]. Later, ] explained the lines by ] or emission that allowed to use them for the identification of ]s. | ] in 1802 and ] in 1814 described the dark lines within the ]. Later, ] explained the lines by ] or emission that allowed to use them for the identification of ]s. | ||
| In the early days of telescopic ], the word ] was used to describe any fuzzy patch of light that did not look like a star. Many of these, such as the ], had ] that looked in many ways a lot like stellar spectra, and these turned out to be ]. Others, such as the ], had very different spectra. When ] looked at the Cat's Eye, he found no continuous spectrum like that seen in the Sun, but just a few strong ]s. The two green lines at 4959 and 5007 ] were the strongest.<ref>{{cite journal| |
In the early days of telescopic ], the word ] was used to describe any fuzzy patch of light that did not look like a star. Many of these, such as the ], had ] that looked in many ways a lot like stellar spectra, and these turned out to be ]. Others, such as the ], had very different spectra. When ] looked at the Cat's Eye, he found no continuous spectrum like that seen in the Sun, but just a few strong ]s. The two green lines at 4959 and 5007 ] were the strongest.<ref> | ||
| {{cite journal | |||
| |author= W. Huggins, W.A. Miller | |||
| |year = 1864 | |||
| |title = On the Spectra of some of the Nebulae | |||
| |journal = ] | |||
| |volume = 154 |pages = 437–444 | |||
| |doi= | |||
| |id={{JSTOR|108876}} | |||
| }}</ref> These lines did not correspond to any known elements on Earth. The fact that ] had been identified by the emmison lines in the Sun in 1868 and in 1895 had also been found on Earth encouraged astronomers to suggest that the lines were due to a new element. The name '''nebulium''' was first mentioned by the wife of Huggins in a short communication in 1898, although it is stated that Huggins occasionally used the term before.<ref> | |||
| {{cite journal | |||
| |title = .... Teach me how to name the .... light, | |||
| |author=M.L. Huggins | |||
| |year = 1898 | |||
| |journal = ] | |||
| |volume = 8 |pages = 54–54 | |||
| |doi=10.1086/140540 | |||
| |bibcode=1898ApJ.....8R..54H | |||
| }}</ref> (''nebulium'', occasionally ''nebulum'' or ''nephelium''). The development of the periodic table by ] and the determination of the atomic numbers by ] in 1913, left nearly no room for a new element. | |||
| ] was working on ] and on the calculation of spectra of the light elements of the periodic table when he became aware of the green lines discovered by Huggins. With this knowledge he was able to suggest that the green lines might be ], and so the hypothetical nebulium that was invoked to account for certain bright lines in gaseous nebulae were shown as due to ] ] at extremely low density.<ref>{{cite journal| |
] was working on ] and on the calculation of spectra of the light elements of the periodic table when he became aware of the green lines discovered by Huggins. With this knowledge he was able to suggest that the green lines might be ], and so the hypothetical nebulium that was invoked to account for certain bright lines in gaseous nebulae were shown as due to ] ] at extremely low density.<ref> | ||
| {{cite journal | |||
| |author = I.S. Bowen | |||
| |year = 1927 | |||
| |title = The Origin of the Nebulium Spectrum | |||
| |journal = ] | |||
| |volume = 120 |pages = 473 | |||
| |doi = 10.1038/120473a0 | |||
| }}</ref> As ] put it, "Nebulium has vanished into thin air." Nebulae are typically extremely ], much less dense than the hardest vacuum ever produced on Earth. In these conditions, atoms behave quite differently, and lines can form which are suppressed at normal densities. These lines are known as ], and are the strongest lines in most nebular spectra.<ref> | |||
| {{cite journal | |||
| |author = R.F. Hirsh | |||
| |year = 1979 | |||
| |title = The Riddle of the Gaseous Nebulae | |||
| |journal = ] | |||
| |volume = 70 |issue = 2 |pages = 197–212 | |||
| |doi= | |||
| |id={{JSTOR|230787}} | |||
| }}</ref> | |||
| ==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:51, 21 January 2010
Nebulium was a proposed element found in a nebula by William Huggins in 1864. The strong green emission lines of the Cat's Eye Nebula, discovered using spectroscopy, led to the postulation that an as yet unknown element was responsible for this emission. In 1927, Ira Sprague Bowen showed that the lines are emitted by doubly ionized oxygen, and no new element was necessary to explain them.
History
William Hyde Wollaston in 1802 and Joseph von Fraunhofer in 1814 described the dark lines within the solar spectrum. Later, Gustav Kirchhoff explained the lines by atomic absorption or emission that allowed to use them for the identification of chemical elements.
In the early days of telescopic astronomy, the word nebula was used to describe any fuzzy patch of light that did not look like a star. Many of these, such as the Andromeda Nebula, had spectra that looked in many ways a lot like stellar spectra, and these turned out to be galaxies. Others, such as the Cat's Eye Nebula, had very different spectra. When William Huggins looked at the Cat's Eye, he found no continuous spectrum like that seen in the Sun, but just a few strong emission lines. The two green lines at 4959 and 5007 ångströms were the strongest. These lines did not correspond to any known elements on Earth. The fact that helium had been identified by the emmison lines in the Sun in 1868 and in 1895 had also been found on Earth encouraged astronomers to suggest that the lines were due to a new element. The name nebulium was first mentioned by the wife of Huggins in a short communication in 1898, although it is stated that Huggins occasionally used the term before. (nebulium, occasionally nebulum or nephelium). The development of the periodic table by Dimitri Mendeleev and the determination of the atomic numbers by Henry Moseley in 1913, left nearly no room for a new element.
Ira Sprague Bowen was working on UV spectroscopy and on the calculation of spectra of the light elements of the periodic table when he became aware of the green lines discovered by Huggins. With this knowledge he was able to suggest that the green lines might be forbidden transition, and so the hypothetical nebulium that was invoked to account for certain bright lines in gaseous nebulae were shown as due to doubly ionized oxygen at extremely low density. As Henry Norris Russell put it, "Nebulium has vanished into thin air." Nebulae are typically extremely rarefied, much less dense than the hardest vacuum ever produced on Earth. In these conditions, atoms behave quite differently, and lines can form which are suppressed at normal densities. These lines are known as forbidden lines, and are the strongest lines in most nebular spectra.
References
- W. Huggins, W.A. Miller (1864). "On the Spectra of some of the Nebulae". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 154: 437–444. JSTOR 108876.
- M.L. Huggins (1898). ".... Teach me how to name the .... light,". Astrophysical Journal. 8: 54–54. Bibcode:1898ApJ.....8R..54H. doi:10.1086/140540.
- I.S. Bowen (1927). "The Origin of the Nebulium Spectrum". Nature. 120: 473. doi:10.1038/120473a0.
- R.F. Hirsh (1979). "The Riddle of the Gaseous Nebulae". Isis. 70 (2): 197–212. JSTOR 230787.