| Revision as of 16:50, 21 January 2010 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →NOINDEX: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:53, 21 January 2010 edit undoJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →A reasonable rate: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Unfortunately NOINDEX is disabled in article space. That can't be done without some fairly serious changes and risks. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | Unfortunately NOINDEX is disabled in article space. That can't be done without some fairly serious changes and risks. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == A reasonable rate == | |||
| I think prodding 100 unreferenced BLP articles per day would be reasonable. If there are a few thousand, that will remove the backlog within a few months. ] <sup>]</sup> 16:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:53, 21 January 2010
Let's try to keep it civil and succinct, eh?
Alphabetize views
Would it make sense to alphabetize the views by username? I've never really liked the idea of chronological ordering, as I think it unfairly favors earlier views too much. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Collaborative views
Could we have a go at establishing some collaboratively edited views? I can see the volume of individual, partially overlapping, partially contradicting views spiralling into WP:TLDR extremely quickly. Perhaps this could be in a separate section at the bottom. Rd232 16:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
NOINDEX
Unfortunately NOINDEX is disabled in article space. That can't be done without some fairly serious changes and risks. Jehochman 16:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
A reasonable rate
I think prodding 100 unreferenced BLP articles per day would be reasonable. If there are a few thousand, that will remove the backlog within a few months. Jehochman 16:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)