Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Lceliku: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:43, 25 January 2010 editKhirurg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,676 editsm →Evidence submitted by Athenean← Previous edit Revision as of 22:49, 25 January 2010 edit undoSulmues (talk | contribs)22,787 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


:'''Commment''': Read ]. Every single one of those users was a disruptive ultra-nationalist SPA, or a sock thererof (e.g. ]). And no, I am not trying to get you banned, this has nothing to do with you. ] (]) 22:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC) :'''Commment''': Read ]. Every single one of those users was a disruptive ultra-nationalist SPA, or a sock thererof (e.g. ]). And no, I am not trying to get you banned, this has nothing to do with you. ] (]) 22:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
::] is not applicable here because I am writing on the part of comments by other users, which would be my case. I am trying to help the admin understand that there are at least 5 users banned or blocked (all Albanians) because they were reported by you, and the socketpuppetry case you are promoting might not be as easy. ] (])--Sulmues 22:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======

Revision as of 22:49, 25 January 2010

Lceliku

Lceliku (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Lceliku/Archive.


Report date January 25 2010, 22:09 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Athenean

User:Lceliku was blocked for a week for posting this TOV on Talk:Albania. He was subsequently indef blocked for repeatedly re-posting this and other threats by block evasion using various IPs . Here Lceliku can be seen bragging about having "200 unused IP addresses". The IPs are thus most likely socks of Lceliku, although it also is possible the IPs could be those of the banned User:Sarandioti . Athenean (talk) 22:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

Both of these users (i.e. lceliku and sarandioti) have been banned as reported by user:athenean, but there is a plethora of Albanian editors that have been reported by Athenean, such as kreshnik25, or guildenrich or I_Pakapshem and so on. In the spree of getting every Albanian editor banned (including myself), Athenean might make a little mess and the admin might fall into it. The culture of suspect is not what should be promoted in Encyclopedia. If the IP address is the same because these people are working from the same university, what happens: no student can edit in Misplaced Pages? I would thereby invite the admin to use caution here with blocking possible socks of people that might have nothing to do with user:lceliku or user:sarandioti. Thanks! sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 22:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Commment: Read WP:NOTTHEM. Every single one of those users was a disruptive ultra-nationalist SPA, or a sock thererof (e.g. User:Kreshnik25). And no, I am not trying to get you banned, this has nothing to do with you. Athenean (talk) 22:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
WP:NOTTHEM is not applicable here because I am writing on the part of comments by other users, which would be my case. I am trying to help the admin understand that there are at least 5 users banned or blocked (all Albanians) because they were reported by you, and the socketpuppetry case you are promoting might not be as easy. sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 22:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Athenean (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


Categories: