Misplaced Pages

Talk:American Whig–Cliosophic Society: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:01, 30 January 2010 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 editsm moved Talk:American Whig-Cliosophic Society to Talk:American Whig–Cliosophic Society: WP:DASH← Previous edit Revision as of 09:03, 31 January 2010 edit undoCodf1977 (talk | contribs)11,512 edits →Previous officers: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:WikiProject_Debating|class=stub}} {{Template:WikiProject_Debating|class=stub}}

== Previous officers ==

An Ip user is adding a list of the last two sets of Previous officers. I do not believe that they should be added unless it can be shown as per ] and ] that any of the named persons are in themselves ].

WP is '''NOT''' a facebook or a substitute for a Society website.

What '''would''' be acceptable is a list of Notable Past Offers/Members - the key to such as list is that they would have their own WP article (thus demonstrating notability) and a ] ref showing they were a member - or one in their article page. 09:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:03, 31 January 2010

WikiProject iconDebating (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Debating, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DebatingWikipedia:WikiProject DebatingTemplate:WikiProject DebatingDebating

Previous officers

An Ip user is adding a list of the last two sets of Previous officers. I do not believe that they should be added unless it can be shown as per WP:NLIST and WP:Source list that any of the named persons are in themselves WP:N.

WP is NOT a facebook or a substitute for a Society website.

What would be acceptable is a list of Notable Past Offers/Members - the key to such as list is that they would have their own WP article (thus demonstrating notability) and a WP:RS ref showing they were a member - or one in their article page. 09:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC)