Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:19, 31 January 2010

John254

John254 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/John254/Archive.

Report date January 30, 2010 02:29(UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

かなコバ (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted

Identical editing pattern and username pattern. 70.17.170.37 (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties   

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

Report date January 31 2010, 16:05 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Andrew the Assasin (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Joe Chill

John254 had many sockpuppets and tried to give the false impression that he was a new user. Andrew the Assasin were to create Template:SpiAfD, create Template:SpiAfD/doc, add a proposal on the village pu8mp page for it, and tag User:Werner Heisenberg (a John254 sockpuppet) as a sock in this AfD. I wouldn't have started an SPI report if he didn't just register today.

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

I can't find significant purpose for this sockpuppet case. Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

• The user is obviously a sockpuppet, having made a very bizarre first seven edits, and should be blocked as an obvious undeclared alternate account being used to evade scrutiny. I'm not convinced that this is a John254 sock specifically, but that scarcely matters. ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 16:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

  Well I do belong to two sockmasters that are both fluent in policy and experience. Can you guess who? Andrew the Assasin (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )

Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

• Open SPI cases
• SPI requests for pre-CheckUser review