Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:18, 1 February 2010

Be it known that Ikip has signed the Petition against Ignore All Rules abuse.

Category:All unreferenced BLPs

{{db-r2}}

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:MovePage/ABC&wpNewTitle=Thispage 

Click here to leave me a message

Awards and articles I created.

view edit I have pressed the "Save page" button, over 45,907 times, making me editor number 320 for number of edits. I now have 20+ barnstars, but like a good monkey, I had to press the little button 2,869 times before I got my first prize.  :( The BLP Barnstar I hereby award you this shiny barnstar for your efforts to alert Wikiprojects about how to locate BLPs for their projects and invite their participation in the discussion that would affect potentially all projects with a mass deletion (50,000 by most estimates) of "unsourced" BLPs. Your notice was such a good idea and sharing those links will help push some of those most familiar with the topics to help the articles at risk. Keep up the great work! -- Banjeboi 12:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC) What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar To the artist formerly known as Ikip, for coming up with Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons/Contest as a productive means to tackling the backlog of unreferenced BLPs. Let's focus our energy and get this puppy off the ground J04n(talk page) 03:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC) The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar For perpetually defending Misplaced Pages's intended and most valuable purpose: catalogging human knowledge. I hope you had a nice Valentine's Day! Sincerely, A Nobody 00:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Defender of the Noble Spirt of Misplaced Pages For your noble and unbreakable spirit of inclusion, mentorship and fraternity towards your fellow editors and the Wikipedian community. --Grancafé (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC) Barnstar of the Lamp For The Huddled Masses For your pure intentioned dedication to speaking for those who do not speak, the wretched refuse of the teeming shores of the internet, providing a lamp of illumination. ----Milowent (talk) 03:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC) The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar For all your work in these difficult days: notifying Wikiprojects, discussing on the RfC's, exposing rogue editors/admins behaviour and also for this exceptional comment, which definitely proves what is the real problem of Misplaced Pages these days. We need more brilliant editors like you! Cyclopia 13:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC) The Guidance Barnstar Hi Okip, this barnstar is for your tireless efforts in helping, orienting and encouraging newcomers and novice editors, like me. Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC) Grand Coffee Vizir Barnstar For your generousous hard work, courage and distinguished dedication to the noble cause of coffee, you are conferred this Grand Coffee Vizir award of high distinction and accomplishment. Congratulations! --Grancafé (talk) 18:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC) The Barnstar of European Merit I can not thank you enough for the work you put into Albania-Serbia relations, there is no doubt in my mind that you have earned this barnstar. -Marcusmax(speak) 01:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC) this WikiAward was given to Ikip by Marcusmax(speak) on 01:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC) The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked Even though I almost always seem to disagree with you, I admire all the hard work you put in to whatever controversy seems to be engulfing Misplaced Pages this week! HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 17:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC) The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar Awarded 20 January 2007 to Travb for his valiant defense of   the Misplaced Pages mission to produce a neutral encyclopedia. Athaenara The Article Rescue Barnstar For your tireless effort to save notable articles at AfD. Honestly, your commitment to fighting unnecessary deletions is extraordinary! SMSpivey (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC) You deserve this Wikidraco scholasticus award for taking on current AfD policy at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Deletion_wars:_I_propose_a_novel_solution - and for having the patience to plough through AfD looking for articles worth saving. --Philcha (talk) 13:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC) The Philippine Barnstar ... for your advice and assistance in the development of a Philippine-related article. -- Sultan-Commander (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC) The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar I award you this barnstar for your continued and tireless efforts to keep Misplaced Pages a welcome place for all editors... from your graciousness and guidence to newcomers who might feel "put off" when their own initial efforts end up at AfD... to your efforts to maintain the integrity of the project and its articles. The job is never-ending, and yet you continue... even when your efforts are sometimes considered as overzealous. Keep up the good fight, but with patience... as Don Quixote is not the only one to find honor in tilting at windmills. Schmidt, 20:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC) A Lucky Penny In the spirit of funding that is sweeping the country this penny is offered to Editor:Ikip for his incredible WikiWorld endeavors:----Buster7 (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC) The Working Man's Barnstar For all your hard work keeping an eye on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (fiction)#Final adoption as a guideline and following up with the people who have commented there. Politizer /contribs 02:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Misplaced Pages Motivation Award have noticed the announcements at several pages and applaud your courtesy in sharing the news that such a discussion is going on, as thousands of affected editors would otherwise have no idea that the fates of so many articles was being determined or where to even look for such a discussion. Well done. I am surprised that others have not themselves been as proactive in seeking a wider consensus for such an important and far-reaching proposal. This thing could impact nearly three quarters of a million articles. Good job!!! Wow. Schmidt, 18:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Articles I have created Using: http://toolserver.org/~sql/created.php Tool. Tool does not count templates. A_New_Life_(The_Outer_Limits) A_Test_of_the_News Template:AbUS --archive box for American terrorism page. Abdellatif_Laabi After_the_Empire:_The_Breakdown_of_the_American_Order American_civil_religion American_Expeditionary_Force_Siberia Army_Foreign_Intelligence_Assistance_Program Association_of_Inclusionist_Wikipedians Axis_of_Evil_(film) Balloon_effect Bell_Trade_Act Benevolent Assimilation Benevolent_Assimilation_(book) The Book of All Flesh as RWV. Calder v. Bull as RWV. Boring law school case. Case-Church_Amendment Charles_Henry_Dietrich CIA_and_Contras_cocaine_trafficking_in_the_US Clark_Amendment Commission_on_Industrial_Relations Commonwealth_v._Pullis Control_(2004_film) Costa_Rican_Civil_War DeLima v. Bidwell Democracy_in_Marxism Domestic_analogy Dreamland_(2007_film) Drew_Griffin CNN reporter Duck_Hook Nixon threat, called for the possibly-nuclear bombing of military and economic targets in and around Hanoi, the mining of Haiphong and other ports Edward_Atkinson Enemy_Nations Estate_of_Rodriquez_v._Drummond_Co. Fablehaven children's books. Firefight_at_Yechon:_Courage_and_Racism_in_the_Korean_War G._Robert_Blakey Green_report Guenter_Lewy Heroism Research Group Hitler's_Willing_Executioners Hughes-Ryan_Act Human_rights_in_Colombia Identical_Strangers...twins were given up by their mentally ill mother and separated as infants...met for the first time in 2004 at the age of 35. Intelligence_Oversight_Act International_Journal_of_Political_Economy, socialist perspective acedemic economic journal. Is the Holocaust Unique? Jacob_H._Smith Joseph_Lafayette_Rawlins Julian_Codman Kerry_Committee_report Kill_the_Messenger Kill_the_Messenger_(film) Klaus_Mehnert La_Violencia Leahy_Law Little_Eichmanns Lodge_Committee Looking_for_Love_(film) a 1964 romantic musical-comedy movie Michel_Garder My_Country,_My_Country Onyx_Project Operation_WASHTUB Operation_Whitecoat PCCC Plan_Cobra Power_Play_(1978_film) Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc. 1995 Rhode Island Supreme Court case often cited in tort law text books to explain the legal concept of battery. Predictions_of_Soviet_collapse Problems_of_Communism_(journal) Psychological_Operations_in_Guerrilla_Warfare San_Francisco_Call Senate_Document Simon_Sisters Sixto_Lopez Talk:American terrorism/Past disagreements Template:AmericanEmpire Template:Colombia conflict Template:Soatitles Template:Stay focused as RWV. This talk page is not a web blog. Template:U.S. Congressional opposition to war The_Saint_Patrick's_Day_Four Sturges_v._Crowninshield as RWV, dealt with the constitutionality of New York creating bankruptcy laws and retroactively applying those laws. Theodore_Schroeder They_Came_Back Thomas_MacDonald_Patterson Thousand_Days_War Timeline_of_labor_issues_and_events Timeline_of_Philippine-American_War Tom_Engelhardt the creator of the Nation Institute's tomdispatch.com, a liberal web blog. Total_Denial a 2006 documentary film about fifteen Burmese villagers going up against oil giants UNOCAL and TOTAL as they build the Yadana Pipeline. Trade_unions_in_the_United_Kingdom TV-6_(Russia) TVS_(Russia) U.S._Army_and_CIA_interrogation_manuals Union of Banana Exporting Countries as RWV. Attempt to create OPEC like cartel for bananas. United_States_Senate_Committee_on_the_Philippines United_States_v._Stanley the United States Supreme Court found that a serviceman could not file a tort action against the federal government, even though the government secretly administered doses of LSD to the serviceman as part of an experimental program, because his injuries were found by the lower court to be service-related. War_Feels_Like_War War_referendum a type of referendum in which citizens decide whether a nation should go to war. William_Lindsay_Scruggs (1836 - 1912) a scholar of South American foreign policy and U.S. ambassador to Colombia and Venezuela. The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule The Original Barnstar For keeping both your integrity and a cool head in the most trying of circumstances. Ireneshusband 05:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC) On 27 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ludlow Amendment, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. The Guidance Barnstar Ikip, you have helped me in many ways over the past few weeks, thank you once again for your assistance. Marcusmax(speak) 23:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC) The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Awarded to Ikip for volunteering to cleanse the Augean stables. —S Marshall /Cont 21:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC) What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar For your elegant and clear solution to some vexing situations I hereby award you this shiny barnstar you can play catch with or trade for superpowers or even put on a display shelf for all to behold and admire. The Article Rescue Squadron is a band of troupers who work in stressful environments to save content worth keeping and your help is very much appreciated. -- Banjeboi 11:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC) What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar This is an excellent idea for Foreign relations of Argentina by country to deal with the minor bilateral relationships, just 1 suggestion for improvement can we sort by continent/region? LibStar (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC) The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar Thank you very much for your successful efforts in strengthening the content and character of Misplaced Pages. Your work is greatly appreciated. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC) The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar I hearby award this barnstar to Ikip due to his heroic campaigning for the noble cause of including valuable and interesting articles in the peoples encyclopaedia. FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC) The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar Thankyou for being so nice to me! ScythreContribs 15:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC) What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar I hereby award this Barnstar to Ikip for his excellent idea to reduce conflict by pre-empting potentially heated AfD debates with a suggestion that articles be userfied, so new users can still work to improve their work, while deletionists are happy as problem articles are removed from mainspace. Everyone's a winner! FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC) andyzweb (talk) haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins! Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all. The Original Barnstar For cutting process, getting crap out of mainspace and helping newbies not to feel bitten all at the same time, a singular achievement. Guy (Help!) 20:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC) This user played a significant role in helping Eddie Kilroy graduate from incubation. This user played a significant role in helping Downtown Emergency Service Center graduate from incubation.

"Disagreeable and closed to new ideas - that's the picture that emerges of contributors to...Misplaced Pages from a survey of their psychological attributes." Aldhous, Peter (January 03, 2009). "Psychologist finds Wikipedians grumpy and closed-minded". NewScientist. Retrieved 2009-05-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help) Source: "Personality Characteristics of Misplaced Pages Members" CyberPsychology & Behavior (DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0225) This project does not exist to help editors grow a thicker skin. Our mission is to build an encyclopedia, not establish limits for low-level abuse that we think our volunteer editors should be willing to suffer. If we drive away more people than we attract, then it's a genuine loss to the project and we should fix it rather than label those who would prefer to work in a civil environment as "thin skinned." -- User:Cool Hand Luke The problem is that our enforcement of civility and NPA has historically been quite selective. If you're unpopular or unpowerful and criticizing somebody popular or powerful, you are likely to be blocked. The other way around, not so much. We ought to come up with objective standards and stick to them. -- User:Jehochman A reliable measure of prejudice is how many mistakes a person gets forgiven. --Durova Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report ...as an approximate guide, you are likely to pass if you achieve at least 75% support. Nominations which receive less than 70% support are unlikely to be successful, except in exceptional circumstances. Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia

Incubator

For what it's worth, having seen your latest comment on WP:AWNB, you won't get any argument from me in moving unreferenced articles to the incubator. I think it's a good idea as general policy, and if it keeps them away from morons like Scott MacDonald, then it's all the better. Rebecca (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Could I request that you hold fire before mass-moving articles to the incubator? There is still discussion ongoing and it would be better to let the dust settle and analyse the conclusions before starting anything on a large scale. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 00:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Of course. I appreciate and respect your concerns. I stopped yesterday and will not resume until a wikiproject agrees fully. RE: "There is still discussion ongoing" where exactly? Ikip 00:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Comment by Ikip

Thanks for bringing up my case there. An editor asked me on my talk page on how to get involved, I had little advice, feel free to post a reply there if you have any better ideas. Power.corrupts (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I will. See:

• Wikipedia_talk:Article_Incubator#I_suggested_this_on_the_BLP_RFC.2C_what_do_you_all_think.3F and the next section following it. Ikip 17:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Ta!

Thanks for the heads-up about the RfC stuff. Looks like it isn't going anywhere, which is nice - another defeat for the toddler faction on these issues.

The irony is that I actually take a fairly hard stance on BLPs. One of the unintended consequences of this ridiculous mess of the last week is that people are now running around sourcing the most obvious facts in BLPs, but leaving the majority of the article - and anything that could actually potentially be made an issue of - unsourced. It's another thing that might have been prevented had people actually thought about this before peeing all over the place. Rebecca (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Always glad to help. Have I mentioned that I am happy to see you back? ;) Ikip 01:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: BLP

Thanks for the comment. I'm not concerned overmuch about the "bullies", & I've been around Misplaced Pages too long to let people push me around. That said, I am honestly disappointed with some of the communications: if those working OTRS have convincing evidence that requires us to treat biographical articles about living people differently from our other articles, they would help themselves if they found a way to share this evidence & not simply imply we should trust them. -- llywrch (talk) 04:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

thanks for your message, I agree so much with what you say, thank you. Ikip 04:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Your post on my talk page.

Thanks for the nice comment. And there I was thinking I was sabotagin my chance for a successful rfa in the forseeabel future. What do you think of this table I'm thinking of developing.--Peter cohen (talk) 14:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

BLP RFC

Thanks for dropping a note... The fact that one of my own articles was an unreferenced BLP is a good illustration: 1) I had completely forgotten about creating that article in the first place (no wonder, three years have passed), 2) talk page notice left by a bot got my attention, 3) in the end, I've added the sources and expanded the article slightly. This is what editing is supposed to be: a cooperative win-win resolution to the problem. I'm afraid that "cleanup at gunpoint" isn't going to help. GregorB (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Chess project

The chess project uses cleanup (WP:WikiProject Chess/Cleanup listing) but the unreferenced lists BLPs only. Can it list all unreferenced articles? Bubba73 , 02:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Muchas Gracias!

I noticed the fine improvements to the reference list. I am glad you did them because I have a phobia to this stuff since I had to study FORTRAN in college. I can't do it! Thus, Muchas Gracias, --Grancafé (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

PS. I am a slow learner, but once I overcome my fears, I can learn. My offer still stands. Whenever you are ready, I am ready. Best,--Grancafé (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the STAR!!! That was awesome! I wish I knew how to do al those cyber tricks. Regarding the 'offer', I thought I had offer you some samples of The Best Coffee in the world! If I did, I am glad. If I did not, I appologize. I will be MORE than happy to send you samples for you to degustate a very unique coffee. Thanks for all your help. Best regards, --Grancafé (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

PS. Why is it that Wanda has not responded to my posting? Also, how do you (I) know who is who (and waht they are) in this laberinth, with all this nicknames going on? It feels like this cyber-game that my son used to play years ago, Ever Quest or like Lord of the Rings, with all the goblins and creatures poping out from nowhere. Best, --Grancafé (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

PS2. What is a Barnstar? Whatever it is, thank you. I used to enyoy my yellow starns in Kindergarten. In appreciation for your effort, patience and commendable work, I bestowe upon you the Grancafe Bambuco award. Please let me know if you would like to receive the actual reaward. Kindest regards, --Grancafé (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Here is your first coffee barbstar

		Civility Award
		message Grancafé (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

That is awesome!

What about a "Coffee Connoisseur" barnstar for merit? Best, --Grancafé (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

{{subst:MeritAward|message Grancafé (talk) 03:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)}} This one did not work. I told you, I am cyber illiterate and I have a phobia to it. Best, --Grancafé (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

I will explain on your talk page. Ikip 00:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Once again, thank you very much for your invaluable, tireless and timely help. The User:Grancafe/test will prove to be of great help and training ground. Most needed for a tenderfoot. Mil gracias, --Grancafé (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 25 January 2010

• BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar

• Births and deaths: Misplaced Pages biographies in the 20th century

• News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more

• In the news: Misplaced Pages the disruptor?

• WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Wikiproject notifications

Your notifications are being posted with a broken link and formatting for the WP:Incubation link. Additionally, there are no links or instructions for what you mean by "install Cleanup_listings". These errors need to be corrected for the notices to serve their helpful purpose. I would like to help implement this for a couple of Wikiprojects. Vassyana (talk) 07:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Involving other language projects

I've posted a message at the Danish project, asking for help. Would be extremely useful with a list of unref BLPs broken down per nationality of subject. Are you aware if such a list exists?. Thx. Power.corrupts (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

user:WolterBot has a maintenance report that projects can sign up to, this includes a list of unreferenced BLPs - but you also have to have put your project's template on the talkpages of those articles. So it might be worth checking categories such as Category:People from Copenhagen to make sure that the individuals have been marked for your project. ϢereSpielChequers 08:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thx Spiel, Ikip already answered me at my talk page, and yes, I was thinking of the possibility that articles do not have the country template on the talk page, but checking that is a breathtaking and overwhelming job. Power.corrupts (talk) 10:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

And I was complaining about having none just the other day. Thanks again and for your improvements to the table.--Peter cohen (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

A shiny barnstar for you

		The BLP Barnstar
		I hereby award you this shiny barnstar for your efforts to alert Wikiprojects about how to locate BLPs for their projects and invite their participation in the discussion that would affect potentially all projects with a mass deletion (50,000 by most estimates) of "unsourced" BLPs. Your notice was such a good idea and sharing those links will help push some of those most familiar with the topics to help the articles at risk. Keep up the great work! -- Banjeboi 12:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, i was wondering what you mean with "Sorry to see your articles up for deletion, I hope you stay :(" No article from me was deleted, or dicussed for deletion GBK2010 (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For all your work in these difficult days: notifying Wikiprojects, discussing on the RfC's, exposing rogue editors/admins behaviour and also for this exceptional comment, which definitely proves what is the real problem of Misplaced Pages these days. We need more brilliant editors like you! Cyclopia 13:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

BLPs and Article Incubator

Hi, thanks for your message on my talk page and for all your good work, especially over the last few days. I'd like to help out a bit, but I should warn you I'm a very slow worker and a technodunce. I can find and add suitable inline citations for some of the unsourced BLPs which have apparently suddenly become an emergency overnight, but I don't want to commit to any specific targets or deadlines in case real life issues get in the way. I could aim to do at least one or two a day: it's not much, but every little helps. If we're sorting them into categories my preferences to work with would be musicians and Scottish people, but I'll have a go at Googling just about anything. If there's anything specific I can do that you think would help, please give me a shout. All the best, Contains Mild Peril (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Pamela Paulshock

Hi, thank you for the message about this article. I left a comment at the AFD page for it earlier today. Like I said there, I had a hard time finding the references for it (that weren't from fansites). I was just helping to cut down the number of unreferenced BLPs. If more references are found, particularly for her wrestling career, then I'll change my vote to keep (if that's allowed?) - JuneGloom07 Talk? 00:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

*chuckles*

I would like to direct you to one of my goals for 2010. See this edit, on my user page? . Would you please help me with the B item on my list? You have it two different ways on the RfC, and neither of them are correct. Just tickled my funny bone, that's all. SirFozzie (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Alex McTaggart

Hi there. Thanks for moving this article to the incubator. I have referenced it and think it's ready to go back to the mainspace. Cheers --Mkativerata (talk) 02:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks heaps for the barnstar. I've been trying to rescue some articles over the last few days but haven't had much time. But when I saw a guy I once voted for in the incubator, I just had to source it right away! --Mkativerata (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Grand Coffee Vizir

		Grand Coffee Vizir Barnstar
		For your tremendous hard work, courage and noble dedication you are conferred this Grand Coffee Vizir award of High Distinction and Accomplishment. Congratulations! Grancafé (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Ever Quest

I thought I had asked you yesterday that how can one determine who all these nicknames are? How can you tell who is an editor, administrator, gendarme, novice, SS, list of titles and positions, etc.? Is there an organization chart, town hall, city hall or court of appeals? How those all this ever quest operate and regulate? Is there a map for this labyrinth? Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 04:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ikip, Thank you very much for all your help, guidance and direction. You have become my "mentor" in this ever quest labyrinth. Thank you very much for all the links and advise. Best regards, Kindest regards, --Grancafé (talk) 23:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Reconstruction Help Needed

Hi Ikip, since I have not hear back from Wanda, may I put these two paragraphs back in the article? What else can I do?

"In December of 1930, the Fourth National Congress of Coffee Growers convened in Bogotá. Due to the vast knowledge and experience acquired by Mariano Ospina Pérez in the coffee industry, as a result of running his own coffee business, he was summoned by the Minister of Industry Francisco J. Chaux and by President Rafael Olaya Herrera to preside over this Congress. Ospina Pérez was elected President of this Fourth Congress. At the adjournment of this Congress, Ospina Pérez was elected, by the unanimous vote of the delegates, as “Gerente de la Federación” (General Director). He served in this position for four years, until 1934.

In 1954, during the election of members of the Board of Directors (of the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia), Mariano Ospina Pérez, who served as President of the Republic from 1946 to 1950, was elected and installed as President of the Board of Directors. His return to the Federation marked the reappearance of one of Colombia's greatest coffee names, in an active role, in the History of Colombia's coffee industry." 42. ^ El Café en la Ecrucijada, Evolución y Perspectivas, Diego Pizano, Editorial Alfaomega, Bogotá, August 2001, Page 31, ISBN 958-682-192-7

Thanks again, --Grancafé (talk) 04:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ikip, Thank you very much for all your help, guidance and direction. You have become my "mentor" in this ever quest labyrinth. Thank you very much for all the links and advise. Best regards, --Grancafé (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Posted in User talk:Flowanda:

Dear Flowanda, please allow me further elaborate here. What I am trying to convey and stress with these two paragraphs is the fact that if the Government, the Federation and the coffee growers of Colombia trusted Mariano Ospina Pérez to run the affairs of the nation’s coffee industry, it was because of his experience, knowhow and successful achievements, proven in the handling of his Ospina coffee business. These two paragraphs are not my words. These are direct quotes from the sources and references. It is essential to explain that his unanimous election to these positions was due to his administrative and entrepreneurial successes in his private coffee business and personal affairs. Thanks for your consideration. Thanks for your consideration. Best, --Grancafé (talk) 00:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Further Help

Hi Ikip, I just saw a response from Flowanda. Please go to my Talk:Ospina Coffee Company and see what she says. There are some issues about Conflict of interest, sourcing and edits since AfD was withdrawn and Clarity concerning family business and company and "According to its history, the company has only been in existence since the early 2000s and is based in the United States. I can find no references to the company name other than the few from product listings and regional articles and none in what little I could see from the article's book references. The family has a long and interesting history and influence in the Colombian coffee industry, but notability can't be inherited or renamed". Please take a look at my response and please let me know if there is anything else I should ad or discuss. Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 02:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

PS. I saw your post on my talk page "I appreciate your persistence, but...". Does this referrer to the two paragraphs that I am trying to bring back to the article or to my response to Flowanda. I am not sure. Please claryfy. Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 03:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

PS. I posted my question again on my talk page. I am clear now on your point of view regarding those two paragraphs. Now I am interested in responding to Flowanda about her new objections. Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grancafe (talk • contribs) 03:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC) --Grancafé (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)--Grancafé (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

my further question

Thank you VERY much for your responses and links. They seem to be most helpful. All I am asking you further is to look at my response to Flowanda and let me know if I have covered her concerns or should I add something else. Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 03:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Collapse boxes

Could you please restore the collapse boxes? They seemed to make the page work much better and improved readability immensely. JoshuaZ (talk) 06:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. JoshuaZ (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom noticeboard

Hi Ikip, I've removed your edit there as "This page is for discussion of formal announcements by the Committee, including clarification of the specifics of notices." Have you seen ? It has a short discussion of what appears to be a forum. If you want to ask ArbCom members a question with no drama, how about emailing their list? Dougweller (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Ian James (broadcaster)

heya, nope had never to do with that article, somehow you ve send the wrong person the message, greets gbk GBK2010 (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

BLP RfC and non-closure

Hi Ikip. I rewrote the tag, wanted to see what you thought. I used your suggested timeline, but I left in the part about asking for a reformat/sorting. I think there's some consensus to do so on the talk page, plus the page is simply becoming unparseable, and is in desperate need of someone to sort the thing by theme/suggestion type, rather than by author.

I'm not sure if you saw, since even the talk page is becoming tl;dr, but there was a proposal to make this 3 phases. Phase I would be the current form, II would be a sorted/organized by theme/topic discussion, and III would try to focus discussion on the most popular / likely to achieve consensus ideas. (All this as opposed to letting the current thing drag on for a month, and trying to get someone to read a consensus out of it). Any opinion on that sort of thing? -- Bfigura 17:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Your new project...

I saw your post on MQS's page about Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject new user welcome, but (in my opinion) the scope of the project is not related to the title of the project. I understand that you are looking for ways to preserve the articles in question, however the title looks like you are looking for ways to ensure the articles are sourced properly in the first place...My opinion is they are both worthy causes, just your nomenclature is confusing. Cheers (and good luck). --kelapstick (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't think it really needs a new name, because I think that the outcome from the project will be a proposal for how to change the way things are handled in the future. Most important is clearly stating what the desired outcome is on the project page, and stating that it will be used as an opinion on the BLP discussion. So maybe just some clarification on the project page is in order. Personally in the invitation I would have probably written the message as:

We are currently asking for concrete, constructive proposals on how to avoid the deletion of 48,000 articles created by 17,500 editors through sourcing.

These constructive proposals will then be considered by the community as a whole at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people.

as

Currently there are 48,000 articles about living people, created by 17,500 editors that can be rescued through sourcing. Our goal is to help ensure new editors properly source their articles so this will not happen again.

Further, our proposals will be considered by the community as a whole at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people as options for how to proceed with the above 48,000 articles.

Or something similar (I am not really good at explaining what I am really trying to say, but you get the idea), just to explain that you are looking for an immediate solution to an existing problem, and a future solution to a major problem within the Misplaced Pages community. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

The easiest way to tell me from Adam is how we dress. I typically wear a plaid shirt, Carhartt pants and black CSA approved class 1 steel toed shoes. Adam typically wore a fig leaf, and not much else. Now that we have that straightened out, I will try to contribute something to the project if I am able, however I am quite busy these days (outside of Misplaced Pages), so I might not have the time to contribute to anything that requires much more brain power than pressing the "revert vandalism" button. Either way, I appreciate the invitation and will try to help out where I can. Cheers. --kelapstick (talk) 21:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I drafted a revised project page at User:Ikip/Wikipedia:Wikiproject new user welcome/Temp, you can use it, integrate it into the existing page or just request it's deletion if you don't like it, but I think it summarizes things fairly well.--kelapstick (talk) 21:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Phobia to Cyberspace

Hello Ikip, whenever you have a chance, I am going to solicit your help again. I think we could integrate references #s 20 and 30 into one. But I have no clue on how to do this, and believe me, I have tried. But my phobia to cyberspace is greater than my desire to do so. Thus, I need your expertise. Just like the barnstars, I can learn, but I need detailed instructions. Thanks, --Grancafé (talk) 00:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Sofixit.org

Although I disagree with its relevance at the BLP RFC, I'm glad you are giving this matter more attention. Incidentally, your last quote is from me, although you attribute it to Casliber. MZMcBride was indeed the admin of that site, and he did his normal evasive shtick in response to straightforward questions.

I found it troubling that Casliber's concerned were brushed off and buried by MZMcBride, who then claimed that Casliber was guided by unclean motives and burnout. Cool Hand Luke 00:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I have been trying to follow this discussion, CHL, and my lack of total understanding of the situation is likely the reason for the following question. I just wanted to know if there was any evidence, either public or private, that clearly proved that MZMcBride was sofixit.org's site admin. NW (Talk) 00:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much cool hand luke. Sorry to mis-attribute, I am glad you were involved in this too. Can the arbcom on your private page decide something to say about this? They were asked to investigate this over three months ago.

Thanks for stopping by nuclearwarfare :) I am really confused too. Ikip 01:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Absent hard evidence of actual on-wiki meat-puppetry or similar, there is nothing for ArbCom to investigate. Most (all?) editors are members of other sites (some open, some closed) and we have neither the resources nor mandate to check up on what they're doing.  Roger Davies 02:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you sir, that is a good enough answer to me, can I quote you Mr. Davies? And close my question? Ikip 02:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

That depends on how you quote me :) (And pleae call me Roger. Everyone else does.)  Roger Davies 02:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

There is evidence on that point, yes. There is no evidence about anything else (let alone evidence of any wrongdoing), as Roger says above. Cool Hand Luke 03:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Of course Roger Davies, you are intelligent not to give anyone a blank check.

The two places where I posted this, on the BLP talk page and the MZM arbitration page, I will type:

{{Resolved}} Arbitration member Roger Davies stated: "Absent hard evidence of actual on-wiki meat-puppetry or similar, there is nothing for ArbCom to investigate. Most (all?) editors are members of other sites (some open, some closed) and we have neither the resources nor mandate to check up on what they're doing."

I will write nothing more in the resolved edit/header. Ikip 03:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation

Hello Ikip. I already started searching sources for the oldest unreferenced BLP's. In my opinion, it is the only constructive solution. This project pays for the carelessness from the past, and people enjoy more the endless discussions than complicated and thankless searching. Now you are blocked for posting me your message. This is bad, since anyone can notify me and invite me this way. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

"Be Bold! Ignore All Rules!"

But make sure you have the "right" people with you first, and then do it on a disruptive, project-wide scale... Or is anyone surprised by hypocrisy anymore?... Chin up. This too shall pass, Ikip. Dekkappai (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I don't think this is Ikip's view. Dougweller (talk) 14:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

No. It's mine. Hence the signature. Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed that, my point is still that I don't think Ikip supports that view, so why are posting it here? Dougweller (talk) 15:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps its to encourage such behavior? It may get praised by those arbcom people, you never know.--Milowent (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

"By invitation only"? Shame on you!

Misplaced Pages doesn't need this sort of activity. BillWvbailey (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Some editors seem offended by the "invitation only" parameter (see my talk page. I had a bit of fun with it). Perhaps opening it up or clarifying why a narrowed grouping was solicited would be helpful. I suspectyour reasoning had to do with getting cooperative brainstorming on approaches to preserving article content needing improvement and that you weren't trying to exlude anyone. But this particular wording, related to attempt to limit debate at first?, seems to have rubbed some people the wrong way. Wikipedians are a very sensitive lot. Inviting anyone who felt excluded and including a short explanation might be a good start. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:18, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Good faith is sometimes in short supply here, but I wouldn't sweat it too much. I know you weren't trying to offend anyone, and I think it's a good sign that people have expressed an interest or at least a desire not to be excluded from discussions. At least people aren't indifferent! ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I tweaked your template with wording that I think communicates your interests. Feel free to revert or revise. :) And most importantly, have fun. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

IMHO

The block was clearly designed as "cool-down" Collect (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Looks preventative and educational to me. Verbal chat 17:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above, in particular Xeno's triumphant "but in 69 minutes the block will lapse, Ikip will not have been unblocked" clearly suggest otherwise, that it is a plot to tarnish Ikip's block record. Also, why else block him when he is asleep. Power.corrupts (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

He was asleep when he replied to the block? Clever. Xeno was replying to my post - his point that a hunger strike until Ikip was unblocked technically wouldn't end when the block expired in 69 minutes because that would not be an unblock but the expiry of a block. Making personal attacks and distorting what people have written is not going to help Ikip. Dougweller (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

An idea I haven't heard anyone suggest yet?

You know I'm more deletionist than inclusionist, but once in a while I end up fighting to include things too. Anyway, something just hit me that I haven't seen anyone suggest yet. What about moving unreferenced BLP's (aside from the obvious hoaxes) to the authors page with a note to reference it properly before returning it to live space? Yes, it would be labor intensive for a little while, but it would also remove it from searches (I think), which is part of the BLP concern. Do you think it's an idea worth even trying to polish the rough edges from? Niteshift36 (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Nice. You and I do not always agree... but userfication of problematic BLPs makes great sense for many good reasons. Nice. Very nice. Schmidt, 18:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Nice idea nite. I will open a new section on the page. I would like your input on this.Ikip 18:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

• I just figure it might kind of appease both sides a little. The info is removed from searches (and google), but the info isn't completely lost. Then, if the author really wants to work on it, he still has a good starting point. It would essentially be a sandbox article and, as long as they didn't write anything really outrageous, it could probably stay there indefinately (I think). Niteshift36 (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree 100%, but will the larger community? Unfortunatly the best ideas are often torpedoed, repeatedly. Here is the section I created more on the page....Ikip 19:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

It's a great idea, and even better if articles, or redirects to them, are placed at a central clearing house, fine with a NOINDEX and all sorts of disclaimers, so article improvementn can take place orderly, and not at gunpoint. Power.corrupts (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

That's the incubator idea. I just worry that if a lot of articles get put there, no one in particular is going to make sure they get done. But incubators might work too. ++Lar: t/c 22:06, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

As a note I have a standing offer to userify articles and userified quite a few of the articles that were deleted a few days back. I think it's a good approach, as asking for userification means someone is taking the task on, and that the community has someone to ask how is it going, or to assist if they seem stuck, or whatever. ++Lar: t/c 22:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Incubator banner

Just wanted to inform you that {{WPAI}} has been created and is now ready to be used on talk pages. Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 00:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much pal! Arteyu ? _{Blame it on me !} 03:07, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Please take me off the invite list

RE: User:Ikip/new user (refactored)

Hi Ikip. Thank you for thinking of me for your various projects, but please take me off of your invite list. I have lots of WP responsibilities right now and have no plans to take on more. In addition, I tend to disagree with the tone that you take in many discussions - as well as in your pointedly-worded invitations- and would prefer not to have those on my talk page. Thank you. Karanacs (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I respect your decision. I apologize for my emotional tone at times, I know the most respected admins on wikipedia hold in their emotions, that is why I will never be one. :) I was naive to send the invitation the way I did, and I have changed the invitation to try to remedy that.

I would love for you to be one of the editors who share your opinion. Thanks. Ikip 15:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Bodmin Community Radio

Hi mate can you help me? The article i created Bodmin Community Radio is nominated for speedy deletion and i cant see why. --Sotonfc4life (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have userfied to User:Sotonfc4life/Bodmin Community Radio; the radio station has not launched yet!   pablo_hablo. 13:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

thank you Pablo. :) Ikip 15:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

BLP discussion

I'll try to post a comment or two this weekend, but can't make any promises. Between FAC/FLC reviewing, trying to cite unreferenced BLPs, and other article work, it's a busy time for me here. Hopefully I can find time to give thoughts on at least a couple of the proposals on the page now. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 19:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

My confusion

Yes, I had made several comments on the project page. Then when I started reading the talk page, everyone was talking about it invitation only. That's why I put it in the form of a question. It didn't make sense to me. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Interested?

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Apache HTTP Server#Making improvements. andyzweb (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

"If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles..."

Curious what you meant by the instruction to contact you in case this condition were true. I probably am already watchlisting all of them in the project I care most about, but if you know some easy way to watchlist an entire category full of articles without having to manually add each to my watchlist, that would be Good News to me. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(ل)ˀ Contribs. 06:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I think you could use Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:Unreferenced BLPs (with added advantage of not polluting your watchlist directly) --Cyclopia 14:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

First of all, do you have User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings in your wikiproject? If you do, I will make a list of links which includes all of those unreferenced BLPs on the list. Ikip 15:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

New Users and BLPs

Thank you for the notice about the new WikiProject. I'll continue to welcome new users when they cross my path (usually by editing something on my watchlist). However, I've stopped improving BLPs for a couple of reasons. Firstly, there's now a significant risk that my contributions will simply be deleted, and I'd rather spend my time doing something more lasting on Misplaced Pages or in the world beyond. Secondly, I see a small cabal of arrogant admins threatening to delete our articles unless we drop everything to work on their pet WikiProject immediately. My natural reaction to such bullying is to do the opposite of what they want, in the hope that their actions will lead to the block they deserve. I realise that you are with the forces of good and I do wish you well, but for these reasons I'll decline the kind invitation to become a formal member of the project. Certes (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)