| Revision as of 18:34, 28 January 2010 editKim Bruning (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,995 edits Maybe we can move towards consensus?← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:12, 2 February 2010 edit undoCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,007 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| --] (]) 18:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | --] (]) 18:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, Multixfer. ], a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to ]. ] has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:12, 2 February 2010
 | This user has asked for Wikipedians to give her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on her edits at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Multixfer. |
I regularly clear old discussions from this talkpage. It's allowed under policy.
| This is Multixfer's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Misplaced Pages's birthday and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Misplaced Pages biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Maybe we can move towards consensus?
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/JWASM#Can_we_tackle_this_by_widening_the_article
I noticed you were adding some comments to the top of the conversation, assuming that no reliable sources could be found.
However, near the bottom we found that we could probably get enough notability if we expanded the scope of the article to also include WASM. Would you be willing to take a careful look and comment on whether that approach would work?
--Kim Bruning (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler
Hi, Multixfer. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/JWASM, a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to Open Watcom Assembler. Open Watcom Assembler has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)