| Revision as of 00:52, 2 February 2010 editRasputinAXP (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,921 edits →ANI?: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:00, 2 February 2010 edit undoVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Rowan University. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| You are quite welcome to report to the ANI. I believe my point is well made. Wiki should not crimes committed on campuses unless there is something special about the university that made the crime happen. It may be more fruitful to seek another editor's opinion as currently I see that its just one editors opinion against another's. ] (]) 00:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | You are quite welcome to report to the ANI. I believe my point is well made. Wiki should not crimes committed on campuses unless there is something special about the university that made the crime happen. It may be more fruitful to seek another editor's opinion as currently I see that its just one editors opinion against another's. ] (]) 00:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :See my comments on the article's Talk page. ] 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | :See my comments on the article's Talk page. ] 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2010 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 14:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:00, 2 February 2010
You appear to have deleted a page entitled "consistency analysis" referenced from this page:http://en.wikipedia.org/Input-output_analysis.
Perhaps I've misunderstood your action in this matter, but I'm currently thinking that there is no reasonable explanation given for this, unless you really think your 'bordom" is reasonable justification for censoring a challenging theory of money by an educated expositor on same.
I, and perhaps others, would like to read an exposition of this author's theory, and decide for myself if it's boring or not.
What say you?
- I say you're an idiot and a moron. But hey, I have a little leeway being a former Administrator. I deleted that in 2006 and you're harassing me about it now? Clearly the boredom's somewhere on your side of the fence. RasputinAXP 16:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Rowan Uni
Great edits on the Rowan page but the Hollybush article really shouldn't exist. That information needs to be incorporated into both the Rowan University page and the Glassboro Summit Conference. The Hollybush article was going to get deleted and so the user just rehashed a lot of information from both of those articles. Only one reference as well. --Peppage 04:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I moved it so I knew where it was (I only found it because I googled "Hollybush" and saw the orphan) and I'm going to do my best to incorporate what's usable from that article into the main Rowan University page. That was just the max I could do last night. RasputinAXP 15:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Roger Holloway
I have nominated Roger Holloway, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Roger Holloway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — MusicMaker5376 03:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
ANI?
You are quite welcome to report to the ANI. I believe my point is well made. Wiki should not crimes committed on campuses unless there is something special about the university that made the crime happen. It may be more fruitful to seek another editor's opinion as currently I see that its just one editors opinion against another's. Steel2009 (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- See my comments on the article's Talk page. RasputinAXP 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rowan University. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Verbal chat 14:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)