| Revision as of 07:39, 6 January 2006 editQuarl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators32,378 edits →[]: vote 'Delete'← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 6 January 2006 edit undo71.137.119.209 (talk) →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | * '''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) <small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small> | ||
| * '''Delete''' as ]. {{alexa rank|www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/|2,470,548}}. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>] 07:39]</small></i></span> | * '''Delete''' as ]. {{alexa rank|www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/|2,470,548}}. <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—] <sup>(])</sup> <small>] 07:39]</small></i></span> | ||
| *'''Keep'''. The article fits the category as well as the other articles in the category. To be consistent, you'd need to delete all of them or none. Simple fairness demands basic consistency. ] 22:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:01, 6 January 2006
The Unalienable Right
Blogger self-promotion (the kind of thing Misplaced Pages could use less of); 124k Google hits, with about five that actually relate to aforementioned blog (Google test doesn't work here; the words are kind of in the Constitution Declaration of Independence) Hosterweis 06:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, blogcruft. Incognito 06:58, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Another useless political blog spamvertisement. --Timecop 07:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable blog. -- (aeropagitica) UK 07:12, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as blogcruft. Actually, the reference is to the Declaration of Independence not the Constitution. And all articles are not created equal, and are not endowed by their creator with any unalienable rights... Segv11 07:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry. Got the two confused. Fixed now.Hosterweis 07:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable vanity - Femmina 07:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Vanity --Depakote 11:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. God bless User:Timecop's anti-bloggery page. Proto t c 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable. Tapir User had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete Notable? I think not. Jmax- 19:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC) User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
- Delete nn blogcrap. Eusebeus 19:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, as non-notable vanity. Ajwebb 22:04, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as Hosterweis says, this is precisely the kind of thing Misplaced Pages could do with massively less of. Just zis Guy, you know? /
AfD? 22:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete although I'm sure the US Constitiution never uses unalienable. It's inalienable. This is blatant non-notable advertising. Dan 22:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The US Constitution doesn't use it at all, believe it or not. It's in the Declaration of Independence though, where it really is "unalienable". You're right it ought to be "Inalienable rights", but it isn't. Segv11 01:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Forallah 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC) User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page
- Delete as non-notable weblog. Template:Alexa rank. —Quarl 2006-01-06 07:39Z
- Keep. The article fits the category as well as the other articles in the category. To be consistent, you'd need to delete all of them or none. Simple fairness demands basic consistency. 71.137.119.209 22:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
