Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:48, 3 February 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: Add suspicious IPs← Previous edit Revision as of 17:50, 3 February 2010 edit undoStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits Added IPsNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --] (]) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC) This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --] (]) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->

Added 3 IPs using typical POV and language at E&E. Two look like the same user even without much digging into network allocations, the third is different but the same. --] (]) 17:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======

Revision as of 17:50, 3 February 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.


Report date February 3 2010, 06:51 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by KimDabelsteinPetersen

This mornings find.... So far *sigh* --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Added 3 IPs using typical POV and language at E&E. Two look like the same user even without much digging into network allocations, the third is different but the same. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Kim D. Petersen (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed Spitfire 09:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Categories: