Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Die Antwoord (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:36, 6 February 2010 editJamsta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers1,205 edits add Keep← Previous edit Revision as of 12:40, 6 February 2010 edit undoZorblek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users581 edits Added to relevant listsNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
*'''Delete''' Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... ] <sup>]</sup> 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... ] <sup>]</sup> 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -] ] 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -] ] 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] ] 12:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)</small>
:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] ] 12:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Strong Keep''' Die Antwoord has enough Google results that they pass a basic sniff test for notability. Half a million Youtube views (for three videos) in 72 hours makes them no less notable than internet memes that have their own Misplaced Pages entry. ] (]) 10:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep''' Die Antwoord has enough Google results that they pass a basic sniff test for notability. Half a million Youtube views (for three videos) in 72 hours makes them no less notable than internet memes that have their own Misplaced Pages entry. ] (]) 10:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' notable in its country and on the way to be a worldwide hit. ] 10:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' notable in its country and on the way to be a worldwide hit. ] 10:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:40, 6 February 2010

Die Antwoord

AfDs for this article:
Die Antwoord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bandspam. Orange Mike | Talk 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -zorblek (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories: