Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Die Antwoord (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:40, 6 February 2010 editZorblek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users581 edits Added to relevant lists← Previous edit Revision as of 16:52, 6 February 2010 edit undoAstanhope (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,369 edits SUPER-KEEPNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
*'''Delete''' Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... ] <sup>]</sup> 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... ] <sup>]</sup> 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -] ] 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -] ] 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
*'''Super Keep!'''* - These guys are blowing up all around the internet, live as we speak. The act's constituents are all well known from previous South African entertainment incarnations. As a group, Die Antwoord now has several top-end, television quality music videos under their belts as well as a CD released on a decent label. They are known and beloved throughout much of the Commonwealth Empire and the English-speaking world... P.S. I am annoyed that YESTERDAY'S deletion discussion was invalidated only to have this new one appear immediately thereafter. The consensus on yesterday's deletion was heavy on the keep side. I just spent an hour tuning the article up to higher Misplaced Pages standards. Would somebody with authority please declare the matter closed with a KEEP so that we may move on? Thanks. --] (]) 16:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
: :
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] ] 12:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—] ] 12:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 16:52, 6 February 2010

Die Antwoord

AfDs for this article:
Die Antwoord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bandspam. Orange Mike | Talk 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete Seems like I'm not completely off the wiki-planet after all... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 03:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability was established pretty thoroughly in the last AFD debate. Just because you have not heard of something or do not appreciate its significance does not mean that it is not notable. Does the article need a lot of work? Definitely. But articles that need work should be tagged appropriately (which it has been), not deleted. Misplaced Pages is a work in progress, and if every article that were inadequately sourced were deleted, few quality articles would ever be written. -zorblek (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Super Keep!* - These guys are blowing up all around the internet, live as we speak. The act's constituents are all well known from previous South African entertainment incarnations. As a group, Die Antwoord now has several top-end, television quality music videos under their belts as well as a CD released on a decent label. They are known and beloved throughout much of the Commonwealth Empire and the English-speaking world... P.S. I am annoyed that YESTERDAY'S deletion discussion was invalidated only to have this new one appear immediately thereafter. The consensus on yesterday's deletion was heavy on the keep side. I just spent an hour tuning the article up to higher Misplaced Pages standards. Would somebody with authority please declare the matter closed with a KEEP so that we may move on? Thanks. --AStanhope (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Categories: