Misplaced Pages

User talk:Meidosemme: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:17, 27 December 2005 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits Reich← Previous edit Revision as of 22:26, 7 January 2006 edit undoFrankZappo (talk | contribs)93 edits ReichNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
==Reich== ==Reich==
Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC) Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

==Re: Falsifiability and Validity==
Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comment on my Talk page. I just responded - also on my Talk page, for continuity. ] 22:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:26, 7 January 2006

Well put!

"I believe that controversial topics should be treated from every point of view, instead of looking for an unattainable consensus."

I agree completely, and I will have the remember this quote for the future since it IS so well put. However, I can't agree with you comment on changing cat. "Pseudoscience" to something else.  :) -- Sjschen 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Reich

Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. SlimVirgin 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: Falsifiability and Validity

Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comment on my Talk page. I just responded - also on my Talk page, for continuity. FrankZappo 22:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)