| Revision as of 17:07, 9 February 2010 editPolargeo (talk | contribs)9,903 edits →Your edits to List of Scientists: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 9 February 2010 edit undoPolargeo (talk | contribs)9,903 editsm →Your edits to List of Scientists: clarifyNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| == Your edits to List of Scientists == | == Your edits to List of Scientists == | ||
| Your request for citations could have been avoided with further reading of list lede section and inclusion criteria. ] (]) 17:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | Your request for citations/clarification could have been avoided with further reading of list lede section and inclusion criteria. ] (]) 17:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 9 February 2010
minor edits
Hi Glover. I notice you mark all your edits "minor"—at least for the last year. I don't remember where I read it, but somewhere it says the definition of a minor edit is small changes which do not affect the meaning of the text. Adding or subtracting text, or significantly changing a numerical value are not considered minor. Your default option in your preferences is probably set. Cheers. —EncMstr 08:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Page formatting
{{helpme}} Hi, I am looking for help with what must be a simple formatting issue. I have checked various help guides and FAQ and cant find the help there.
It seems whenever I use a template box, such as
{{User Australia}}the next section break does not start on a new line, or paragraph.
This link should show what I mean: http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Glover#About_me_2 . Is there a simple, elegant solution to fix this. I found using tables to enclose stuff kinda works but it seems like a 'bad' way to do it.
Thanks for any suggestions.
- {{clear}} will clear out floating sections and start new things on a new line. DoubleBlue (talk) 01:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Category:Web development
Your user page is showing up in this category - user pages should not be categorized in the main pagespace, could you fix it please. Thanks 69.106.242.20 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Your edits to List of Scientists
Your request for citations/clarification could have been avoided with further reading of list lede section and inclusion criteria. Polargeo (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)