Misplaced Pages

User talk:Boromir123: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:54, 12 February 2010 editAzumanga1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers98,356 edits Warning for removal of content.← Previous edit Revision as of 05:02, 12 February 2010 edit undoBoromir123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,016 edits Undid revision 343491031 by Azumanga1 (talk)I deleted one unsourced sentence and was planning to read after citationNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


:You're welcome. And, with apologies for bringing up something else - when you post a comment on a user talk page that is not part of a continuing conversation, please use the "new section" tab, rather than adding the comment to an existing section. And when you do add a comment within an existing section, you should indent it using one or more colons, depending on how indented the prior comment is. (More on talk page norms can be found ].) -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] </font> ] 15:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC) :You're welcome. And, with apologies for bringing up something else - when you post a comment on a user talk page that is not part of a continuing conversation, please use the "new section" tab, rather than adding the comment to an existing section. And when you do add a comment within an existing section, you should indent it using one or more colons, depending on how indented the prior comment is. (More on talk page norms can be found ].) -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] </font> ] 15:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

==]==
] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages{{#if:Focus on the Family|, as you did to ],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> -- ] (]) 04:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:02, 12 February 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Boromir123, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  ElinorD (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, I was just looking at the page for Gov. Jindal and it looks like you've been doing a great job over there. Keep up the good work! - Schrandit (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Did you see this discussion - http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Sathya_Sai_Baba&diff=337689481&oldid=337130963? - When you get a chance please add your comments. Radiantenergy (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Boromir123! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Marnix Van Holsbeeck - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

addition

saw the edit on the voting record. I was going to check on that myself later because it seemed POV. Thanks for the clarification.Malke2010 02:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Summary: A couple of users have given me some advice that I should explain the reasons for deletion/changes either on an article discussion page or on the edit summary. I promise to be more diligent in this regard in the future.Boromir123 (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Blogs

Just a quick note - there is a significant difference between a blog by a newspaper reporter done on a newspaper website, and a personal blog. The first is a reliable source; the second is (almost always) not. To quote the guideline:

Some newspapers host interactive columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are professionals in the field on which they write and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control.

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. And, with apologies for bringing up something else - when you post a comment on a user talk page that is not part of a continuing conversation, please use the "new section" tab, rather than adding the comment to an existing section. And when you do add a comment within an existing section, you should indent it using one or more colons, depending on how indented the prior comment is. (More on talk page norms can be found here.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)