Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sulmues: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:13, 12 February 2010 editSulmues (talk | contribs)22,787 edits February 2010← Previous edit Revision as of 23:37, 12 February 2010 edit undoGaius Claudius Nero (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,034 edits Thanks: new sectionNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
::If the article's bad enough to need deletion, then I'm sure someone else will list it in the fullness of time. There's no need for you to push the boundaries of your ban just to get it done now rather than waiting for someone else! ] | ] | 22:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC) ::If the article's bad enough to need deletion, then I'm sure someone else will list it in the fullness of time. There's no need for you to push the boundaries of your ban just to get it done now rather than waiting for someone else! ] | ] | 22:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
:::Cancelled! Since you feel like there is a conflict of interest... ] (])--Sulmues 22:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC) :::Cancelled! Since you feel like there is a conflict of interest... ] (])--Sulmues 22:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for the recognition. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to make further edits recently, but I have plans for many more.--] (]) 23:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:37, 12 February 2010

Awards stuff

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I have looked at your contributions and you have made many edits recently therefore you deserve the Tireless Contributor Barsntar. Well done and keep up the good work. Regards IJA (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
The Content Creativity Barnstar
On your contribution, creating tons of articles of quality in wikipedia. Because an encyclopedia needs real contributors with scientific knowledge. Keep up the excellent work!--74.59.88.57 (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
You deserve this barnstar because you got the patience I don't.74.59.88.57 (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I have to remind you that your topic ban in Kosovo related articles and discussions is still active and I kindly ask you to close your recently filled afd case.Alexikoua (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your gently reminder. I take the ban very seriously and I am respecting it. However, as explained in the AfD, I nominated the article because according to this version () Serbs were also persecuted by Albania and Croatia, other than Kosovo. Kosovo may be present in the article, but as an active member of the Albania task force I have to take care of the Albania project. However if any admin deems that my nomination is a break of the Kosovo topic ban, then I will cancel the nomination. sulmues (talk) --Sulmues 22:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sulumes. As an uninvolved admin, I hope you won't mind me dropping in on this.
As you say, Kosovo isn't the specific focus of the article, but it's still involved even if other topics are as well. I think this is enough to count as "Kosovo-related", and deletion is certainly getting involved with the article. As such, I think it's best for you to withdraw the nomination and let it be for now.
If the article's bad enough to need deletion, then I'm sure someone else will list it in the fullness of time. There's no need for you to push the boundaries of your ban just to get it done now rather than waiting for someone else! Shimgray | talk | 22:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Cancelled! Since you feel like there is a conflict of interest... sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 22:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the recognition. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to make further edits recently, but I have plans for many more.--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)